Comments by "EasyGameEh" (@EasyGameEh) on "Lex Clips" channel.

  1. this is actually brilliant. instead of optimising under high uncertainty - basically monkey business - design your workflow in such a way it is flexible and ready for future opportunities for much more effective change.
    42
  2. terrorists win
    4
  3. the shampoo argument is pretty lame - i don't buy shampoo because i see ads for it and can't counteract them. in fact i haven't seen ads for pretty much anything in many years. still i buy alot of stuff. and things you could call ads - like flagship phones reviews on youtube - do not affect me, i still don't buy them.
    3
  4. give him credit - he's literally showing the tree emerging while peterson usually shows every abstraction with these hand wavings.
    3
  5. just bear in mind, when the person you're speaking with is lying to your face, for example, to eat this shit is not equal to be open to other people's ideas and to confront it with logic and facts is not equal to not be open. the truth is not in the middle between a lie and the truth. the truth is truth and it's ok to take a stance there.
    3
  6. well implemented mass transportation system not only transport alot of people fast and cheap, but also makes room on the streets for people with anxieties and all sorts of other demanding mental conditions like yourself to take the pleasure of driving in your private box and to not just waste hours jammed in traffic.
    3
  7. the dude can't put an idea into a comprehensive form.
    3
  8. i love it when lex's guests speak russian even if it doesn't make much sense
    3
  9. what he's saying isn't "a middle ground" and "a bit of both", it is literally bret's position - consider what information you have and calculate risk-reward however you can and make your decision.
    2
  10. corporate censorship is out of hand. and combined with its unlimited power and clear selfinterest/antihumanistic incentive it is a very sad future in the making.
    2
  11.  @wellsmitchell49  you should use pure logic and reason exclusively to maximize your goal function, but you can't formulate it - the funtion itself - properly without emotions, morals and so on. the logic executed with absolute precision leads to disaster if set up with flawed goals in mind. you know, there's this concept in science fiction and/or philosophy where the creation of an AI to build a better world and future for humanity leads to its elimination instead. the function's extremum is often lies on the border of parameters' range. so a free of amotions ai with perfect logic just finds a sulution in extermination of humanity. basically kind of like marxism of fascism - like yeah, yeah, we're killing you for your own good, here's the receipt.
    2
  12. i can't decide - is this guy clueless or delusional? i'm guessing all those "intelligence" jokes from george carlin are still on point.
    1
  13. stone isn't an expert by any measure - he's just a lying putin's shill or a useful idiot at best (though much less likely).
    1
  14. lex, if you're a frog, blink once
    1
  15. 3:01 "love special" on tegridy farms
    1
  16. as a kid i thought this supplement is made of bear's blood for some reason.
    1
  17.  @tipoomaster  this is fine. malice brought some authentic russian sweets one of which turned up to be a blood based supplement instead of a chocolate bar.
    1
  18. 1:09 zalupa different
    1
  19. fucking disgrace. though he's on putin's payroll for ages, so no surprise there.
    1
  20. 2:29 tfw you got your robot's attention
    1
  21. he and the kagan guy from the institute of war (he had a couple of great interviews with jordan peterson actually), gets most of the things right about russia.
    1
  22.  @there_was_a_2453  right means factually correct.
    1