Comments by "Quizmaster China" (@QuizmasterLaw) on "Could Libyan OIL have solved the Axis oil crisis of WW2?" video.
-
23
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickden8362 From what I read the oil produced in the middle east was of lower quality and would not be so suitable.
You imagine Rommel is able to get all kinds of resupply; he can't, because he didn't. He didn't because of the royal air force and the royal navy. Shipping more tanks, if they even reach Africa (many went to the bottom of the sea, thanks ULTRA!) still need fuel and oil. You're also imagining the British would not have stripped Asia of soldiers further, but they would simply have removed even more troops from Asia. So Rommels grand and glorious unsupplied wehraboo advance o to far, very far distant oil fields (where are the refineries? oh, even if there were refineries on site the British would have destroyed them)... well, like most fantasies about the nazis winning yours too ignores facts. Where are all those Germans going to get water, fuel, ammunition hm? How are they going to evacuate their wounded? And when is Stalin going to see that and decide to attack the much reduced number of nazis in Poland? At best, your unrealistic views result in a quicker loss of East Asia. The axis had plenty of oil. In Indonesia and Vietnam. Yet even there it was unable to be used, thanks to the U.S. Navy.
1