Comments by "Quizmaster China" (@QuizmasterLaw) on "Why did Synthetic OIL not solve the AXIS OIL Crisis?" video.

  1. Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, these days known as DAAD. <3
    3
  2. TIK even if Baku and Stalingrad fell Murmansk and Arkhangelsk are there and sending ALL the goods and maybe soldiers too is an obvious Anglo-American go to move EVEN if the USSR just decides that starving to death and being shot and hung by the fascists means they should surrender to that the USSR had NO surrenderr option and so EVEN if Hitler reached ALL the NS goals there would have been -- as he intended! -- a constant guerilla war which the Anglo-Americans would have been only too happy to fund and encourage. All the economic scarcity of the two dictatorships (NS Germany and USSR) was not the case of the Americans or even Canadians. Would Baku and Stalingrad have ended lend lease? No! Just the opposite! Would Baku and Stalingrad have changed the nuclear equations? No! The USA would still get the atomic bomb before NS Germany and would absolutely have used it as the firestorm bombings of Hamburg Dresden Stuttgart Bremen show. Nukes+Lend Lease = NO NS Victory even if Stalingrad falls even if Baku falls even if BOTH fell AND NEITHER DID.
    3
  3.  @herrrobert5340  One or both of Murmansk and Arkhangelsk are in fact ice free year round thanks to the warm N. Atlantic current. The Kola peninsula was and is a huge maritime region for the USSR and Russia. While I might agree that mos lend lease went via Persia that was only after the USA got in the war, Plenty went via Murmansk. Yes, the Murmansk run was riskier but this was due to submarines and air attack, both of which substantially diminished with the appearance of CVEs and CVs when the US entered the war. And the USA still gets nukes and still wins the war, just at a greater cost. Just as the British supplied China via Burma so also could lend lease have reached Russia that way or via Tibet. These are difficult but not insurmountable problems. So I don't believe I am "way off".
    1
  4. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/gas-powered-fahrschulwanne-tanks.php Panzer VIIc "Coyote" (also known as "Wile ”）
    1
  5. the German term is "wood gas" but I don' t honestly know the English for this word.
    1
  6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LEI8DPlcoM AND THESE ARE THEIR *GIRLS*.
    1
  7. You can power tanks with coal and moreover Germany did. Those tanks were only used in training. Basically the wood burns to charcoal the charcoal gives gas and then you go. I'm not sure what the English word for this is.
    1