Comments by "" (@snowcat9308) on "CNN"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jim6186 Unprotected sex, in general, can spread STIs. Gay people often have sex unprotected because there's no risk of accidentally making a child. Of course, you should never have unprotected sex unless you really trust the person, no matter who your partner is or what's between their legs. That's not a gay problem.
Just because sex is intended for reproduction, doesn't mean that it isn't or shouldn't be done as an expression of intimacy and love between two people. It's perfectly natural to have non-reproductive sex, and no one is asking for everyone else to start being gay. So, that's not a gay problem.
I'm not sure what you're talking about with the school thing, because I've never heard anything beyond a cold, detached, and anitomical tone is used to describe reproduction and sexual health--Which, by the way, is only taught to highschoolers. And Sex Ed is how we properly teach kids to ALWAYS use protrection, so we can midigate the spread of STIs discussed in your first point.
I do agree with you that SOME people act in unbecoming ways during Pride Parades. That's in public, there are kids around, and no one wants to see that. However, that is a problem with INDIVIDUALS within the gay community, not a problem because they are gay, nor is it representative of gay people as a whole. Some people are just maniacs.
Yes, generally gay people have a very libertarian "do what you want, as long as no one gets hurt," way of operating. That is, of course, because that very ideology is what allows us to live our lives in peace and without judgement or persecution from others. I fail to see how "live and let live" is a bad way of living, especially when my romantic and sexual life has absolutely zero effect on your or anyone else's well-being.
I don't even want to touch your comment about trans people, mostly because I'm not trans and I can't properly, personally convey how wrong what you just said was. I would, however, love to see an example of schools "grooming" children into undergoing gender transitioning. And, gee, I can't imagine why one of the most marginalized groups in the West would be so prone to committing suicide. I'm sure it has absolutely nothing to do with sometimes being rejected by their family and friends, being ridiculed constantly by strangers who describe their experience as "chopping off their ding-dong", or otherwise make their mental state feel illegetimate.
Hate to burst your bubble, but being gay is very normal. It's been observed in many animal species besides humans, the most notable of which is the giraffe, mentioned previously.
Your opinion is obviously not "educated" because you clearly don't understand the legal and social persecution LGBT people suffer all over the world. When we are forced from our homes or thrown from the tops of buildings, we feel pretty compelled to come together and defend ourselves in numbers. It's hard to quietly remain in our bedrooms when we face social ostricism for something as braindead simple as loving another of the same sex. THAT isn't cool and we won't chill out until you do. Gay people are going to be a part of OUR culture because we EXIST. If you can't get over that, that's a you problem.
For three paragraphs you just sit there flatly asserting nonsense about the "Sexual Revolution!!!" and cultural degradation, but I only see the proliferation of libertarianism and liberal thought. We live in an age where our society is more tolerant of racial, sexual, or sexuality differences than it has ever been. I fail to see how improving the wellness and confidence of your peers by not bothering them about the most inconsequential things is going to lead to the destruction of our society.
And so we come to the pedophilia stuff. You are woefully misinformed, mister "educated opinion", if you think for a moment that anyone in the LGBT community (who isn't a pedophile themselves) thinks for a moment that we should be associated with pedophiles. The largest anti-gay propaganda tool in the past has been to accuse gay people of liking children. It disgusts me that you are so deeply lost that you would read some article from NewsMax and genuinely believe that actual maniacs on Twitter calling themselves "MAPs" would be even vaguely representative of where the LGBT community stands, or where it's going.
Remember when I said "Do what you want, as long as no one gets hurt."? Yeah, PEDOPHILIA HURTS CHILDREN. We know this. You know this. Most people know this! And as long as everyone knows this, MAPs will NEVER be accepted by the LGBT community or society more broadly.
And don't give me the "with love" bullshit. You lost my respect when you doubled down on the pedophilia comparison. Take your meds and stop watching Fox News, old man.
~✨With contempt✨
SnowCat
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrispredsfan I find your anecdote exceptionally hard to believe. Even if it's true, she isn't a cat. Humans are born as humans. Cats are born as cats. There is no biological or scientific precedent for justifying "trans-species" identification. Let's not let that obscure (and possibly plagiarised) anecdote distract us from addressing your internalised homophobia, though.
I'm not being hateful towards you--and certainly not because you "said a preacher or a person can believe what they want". I am trying to make you understand that you are homophobic, even if you don't outwardly condemn homosexual people. You harbor a belief (or at least agree with the belief) that gay people deserve to suffer eternally because of who they love. That is 'hate', so-called.
I do find it exceptionally interesting to hear an argument for subjective morality coming from a fundamentalist who swears by the Bible's infallibility, though. Yes, a person can believe whatever they like! I can, for example, believe that white people are physically and mentally superior to black people based on our biology. That doesn't make it true, nor does that make it morally acceptable by our society's standards. Would it be fair for me to call someone "hateful" if they were to admonish me for my "race realism"? Or am I being the hateful one by being racist? Just because morals are subjective, doesn't mean that you can go around treating people however you please.
You can't just whine and cry "waaah you're being so hateful to me!!!" when someone calls you out for being homophobic. Your right to swing your fists ends at the tip of my nose.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Methyl If we are to prove something, then we need to look at it from an outside perspective. If we approach the question of God's existence with the presumption that he is already real, then we aren't going to be fair to ourselves with our research. By responding to my question "How do you know that the universe was created?" with "Duh... everything we know has been created," proves to me that you aren't interested entertaining the point through any other worldview than "God is real!". That is, quite literally, the same as saying, "How do I know the universe was created? Duh! It was created!"
And no, not everything we know was created. The Earth, for example, was not "created". It formed as a result of gasses (and later meteors, planetoids, and other space rocks) coalescing into a very hot piece of rock nearly 4.5 billion years ago. Ask any geologist or physicist astronomer--who as dedicated their lives to studying these things--and they will agree. Of course, we can trace all matter (because it cannot be created or destroyed) back to the Big Bang, before our models break down and we can't accurately predict what happened prior to it.
And no (part 2), science hasn't "confirmed and affirmed" that the universe had a beginning. To our understanding, we cannot comprehend the universe prior to the Big Bang because our concept of "time" isn't applicable and our scientific models break down and don't make sense. That doesn't mean that nothing existed prior to the Big Bang, nor does it mean that God is real.
All of this information has been determined through using the scientific method, which uses repeatable, verifiable, and falsifiable tests and hypotheses to determine things about the universe to the best of our ability. This method has brought our technology and understanding of the universe to where it is today; much, much further than where it was thousands of years ago when the Abrahamic religions began.
I suppose I was being a little catty (get it? catty?) when I directly asserted that God isn't real. There is no way to know for certain, because God is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. That said, I have yet to see enough evidence that suggests that he is, so I continue to live my life like he isn't. As in, not hating myself for loving other men, which was what this comment was about in the first place, in case you forgot the hateful subject matter of the video.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1