General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Short-Fingered Vulgarian
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Short-Fingered Vulgarian" (@TrumpCantRead) on "'You Create A Safe Haven For This Type Of Antisemitic Behavior': Jim Banks Blasts UPenn's Presiden" video.

@nigel.w this is false: “if i claim a fact its a fact” You do not get to decide what is a fact or not a fact
4
What are some specific examples of her “cancelling everyone” ?
4
Maybe they have no knowledge of international affairs
3
@nigel.w btw - ive no interest in your opinions, but i DID enjoy you espousing for moral relativity while saying you were not. That was great
3
Why? Can you explain what impressed you? Sidebar : Are you impressed by bullies?
3
Unfortunately for you, it does not matter what you believe or what you do not believe. Only facts matter.
3
@Mario-eo3yt the problem is RELIGION - death struggles over “sacred land” is insanity
2
⁠ @chadmeidl1140 Not going to college and not getting a degree does not make you intelligent. And Downs Syndrome people have nothing to do with this.
2
Well religion helps. Have you given it your best shot? What have you tried in the past?
2
Cool but do you have any facts? I ask because you have only typed your feelz.
2
@cottonswan Do you have any examples? I suspect you do not
2
@hanke2456 are you saying universities are required to meet quotas? Who are the BYU profs that are atheists?
2
@hanke2456 what does Roger Waters have to do with “shutting down the right”?
2
@hanke2456 Do you have proof anything claimed in that movie is true?
2
⁠ @eirenmist12 “She” never made any such statements
2
@trouts4444 I always do my homework at a desk, so can’t do both. You will have to choose between the two - I await further instructions
2
@hanke2456 but what YOU claim YOU can “do” or “not do” is irrelevant to the merits of their claims
2
What “facts”? And what does “right side of humanity” mean?
2
But your opinions are irrelevant. Do you have any facts?
2
Why? Please be specific
2
@smhollanshead who is “we”? Do you do hiring for Penn?
2
@privacyfig how so? What are the names of the board members who are similar to her, and how are they similar?
2
@sicsicdeborah6866 How do you know what they are “like”?
2
Who are these alleged “leftists” and when have they said what you claim they have said?
2
@oahuhawaii2141 Do you know the names of these “leftists” he is talking about, or what he claims said leftists have “declared”? Apparently he does not.
2
Examples?
2
@paulharrold hilarious how you claim to know what’s being taught in every classroom, everywhere. Sweeping vague declarations about “Marxism” are not “better replies”.
2
@myphilippineamericanjourne4731 do you have “a right to know” what the FBI, the CIA, the DOD and the DOJ are doing?
2
@charp150 Why? Please be specific
2
Why are you asking rhetorical questions and stating opinions? Do you have a point to make or assert?
2
When were they arrested and for what? I dunno how they do it in your country but in USA we dont “lock her up” because some blowbag demands it be done.
2
Are you saying teaching kids about anti-semitism is wrong, or are you saying teaching kids about anti-semitism should be taught somewhere other than university? It’s confusing because Christains make lots of demands regarding what others must do, and im curious if this is included under that umbrella
2
@mr.brightside6576 i never owned that record so how could i have lost it? Im familiar with the band, though so will check it out thanks! Now regarding your opinions…. Im not really interested in them as i do not see any point in subjective thoughts without some facts to use for an argument regarding “how it should be”. And frankly i do not see much, if any, facts being typed in these threads. Lots of opinions, judgement, assumptions, lies….
2
Why? Please be specific using facts
2
@nigel.w Hillsdale’s “academic reputation” is christain nationalism, and the promotion of childish myths as the “gospel truth”
1
“presumably” you are unaware of extremely low unemployment rates which requires corporations to lower their standards in order to put butts in seats at the existing pay rates below the wages paid to college graduates. Now please provide your description of this alleged “woke agenda”. And be specific
1
@nigel.w both morals and ethics are subjective. For example, I think you are not being moral in your post, because you are not typing facts. Presumably, you believe it’s perfectly moral and ethical to do so.
1
@chadmeidl1140 ”1828 dictionary” - look up quantum computing in that bad boy and use your intelligence to explain what it says.
1
@ronb8965 your claim is factually incorrect.
1
@nigel.w wrong poster, as i did not state any opinions. And can you please complete this sentence: “i did enjoy you espousing for moral relativity while sating you were not…….” “Not” what? Dont leave me hangin’ ! oh one quibble: “espousing” means “advocating for, supporting”. With morality I’m stating a fact, morality IS relative
1
@ronb8965 “no one” is an absolute, rendering your claim ludicrous. And your claim is irrelevant, as i posted facts, not opinion
1
@ronb8965 wrong poster, as I never typed about my feelz. Now how would I have “sources” about these alleged posting of “feelz”? Please explain, as your sentences each contradict the other
1
You should tell them yourself! No question that they will look to you for advice on what they “should do” or “shouldn’t do”
1
@egosumhomovespertilionem lets see the data that supports your claim
1
@nigel.w bold claim! Git proof? I suspect you do not
1
@nigel.w Who is guilty of Contempt of Congress?
1
Go ahead and investigate away! Its a free country. But why are you typing your emotions for strangers to read? Very odd
1
@pritamroy9833 define “that’s”
1
@allysondoerfler2435 ”free speech” only means government can’t pass laws limiting speech based on content
1
@MotiMota15 ah no, he is a British musician. Google “Pink Floyd”.
1
@hanke2456 What if you were to say it in any empty room?
1
Ronald Reagan committed treason
1
If its “obvious” can you provide five examples? Also, why do you claim people are guilty based only on an accusation? Thats the opposite of American ideals. Perhaps you are not an American, and unaware of our freedoms.
1
What “damage”? Please be specific so that we can evaluate your abilities to predict the future. And whats the timeline? Gonna need you to commit on that
1
@oahuhawaii2141 Where did she say “promises to stop donations” is why she resigned? And why should the board resign ?
1
Who are you talking about?
1
@moniquebode1655 So you have an opinion,, and claim to be a mind reader. Got it
1
Why are you sharing your hopes and dreams with strangers on a message board about a Congressional hearing? Serious question
1
@oahuhawaii2141 and what’s your point?
1
@Meg-ts3kx I do not know what “earing ability” means, so I can’t answer your question. btw - you have contradicted yourself, seemingly without knowing. 1st claim : “she repeats the same scripted answers” 2nd claim : “without actually answering a single question” 1 contradicts 2
1
@Meg-ts3kx by “repeating a scripted prepared-in-advance answer” to the question…. she ANSWERED the question. You even SAY so in your post! Right there after “prepared-in-advanced”. For instance : You said he asked “why were clearly antisemetic speakers invited to speak despite the fact it obviously creates an environment where it’s legitimate to be antisemetic, did you get a reply on that? “ If she says “yes”, does that mean she “got a reply”? And if she got a reply, shouldn’t she answer “yes”? And if she didn’t, shouldn’t she answer “no”? What’s the point here?
1
@Meg-ts3kx AND his long, winding convoluted actually asked TWO questions. Starts with : “why were…. ” and ends with “on that?” And in between he makes unsubstantiated claim, AND calls his personal opinion a “fact”. example : “the fact it obviously creates an environment” is NOT, in fact, a fact! It’s an assumption, and misleading, because it should be written as “despite the potential for” or “despite the possibility of”.. Furthermore “obviously” is a subjective term. Then he lies again by claiming “where it is legitimate to be antisemitic”. How is it “legitimate”? Is he claiming it’s legal? Is he claiming that inviting someone to speak “legitimizes” the speaker? And by extension, antisemitic speech? That’s ludicrous
1
@kulasirisiri1155 “judge not lest ye be judged!” “He that lives in glass houses should not through stones” “Thou shall not bare false witness”!
1
but your opinions are irrelevant
1
@andrewb8235 what does “can’t account for” mean? Are you saying she has authority to stop people from speaking?
1
@rachelgarber1423 …. and its a monday. Whats your point?
1
@rachelgarber1423 your sentence fragment, devoid of context, is vague. Can you explain what you are referencing?
1
@rachelgarber1423 !!!!
1
@rachelgarber1423 please define what you mean by “called out”?
1
@oldsalt8011 who is this “multi-millionaire”?
1
@rachelgarber1423 OH I can answer that question : depends what YOU mean by “censor”. Does “censor” mean : Decide who can, and who cannot, speak on campus? Or does it mean something else?
1
@oldsalt8011 ahhhhh… so you have no proof! shocked
1
Crazy that you think all questions can only be answered with a yes/no, or that a Congressman can demand a respondent meet the terms of the demand. Mind boggling!!
1
@wileuler5461 Why? I’m interested in your reasoning here.
1
What “truth”? Please provide examples
1
Thanks for sharing your feelz and predictions! Not sure why you did so but its probably wise to let out all that emotion! Now what “hate speech” are you saying was “covered up”? And how is “hate speech” supported? And who are the “others” lacking tolerance? Sorry for all the questions but your claims are very vague
1
Why is it a “disgrace”?
1
Ive never sent money to any of these “colleges”, have you? btw - Universities are not a “college”. Keep that in mind for your next brainbelch of opinion
1
whats an example of a “right question” or a “left question”? And why should the University folks be “shamed”?
1
Its funny that you equate your personal experiences with universal facts
1
@nigel.w what are some examples? I noticed you didnt name any
1
@dharialurie2195 point?
1
Why shouldnt they “remain at these schools?” And why do you believe your opinions are relevant to the hiring practices of said schools? It’s absolutely mind-boggling that you presumably believe your opinions are somehow relevant
1
Why do you claim they are “hateful people”? And why do you claim taxpayers money is used to pay their salaries? Unless of course you are referring to the Republicans. If so, agreed!
1
@Mario-eo3yt the thing is he/she had no facts, just feelz.
1
Your opinion is noted, and filed as irrelevant
1
Who, the angry Republicans? They cant be “sacked”, but they can be defeated in their next election
1
@paulharrold you’ve never been in a classroom
1
@AF53501define “that”
1
@privacyfig What are they “using the money for” that you find objectionable ?
1
@kborak giving government money to religions is unconstitutional, yet Republicans refuse to stop.
1
@kborak ”both sides”? How are democrats “acting like children”? This entire “investigation” is REPUBLICAN, desperately trying to distract from Trump’s ninety one count indictments
1
@javierrusso375 unsubstantiated claims - meaningless declarations
1
@paulharrold you didn’t make a “point”, you made an unsubstantiated claim
1
@AF53501 Wrong poster, as I can read AND write, as evidenced by our exchange Or was your question rhetorical?
1
@privacyfig your statement advocates government intervention and oversight into every phase of a citizen’s life. Are you Russian by chance?
1
@ValkyrieVerus by “terrorists”, are you referring to foreign agents of hostile foreign regimes? Or are you referring to white christain nationalists, like the Trump supporters who attacked the Capitol Building on Jan 6th? Or perhaps some other group?
1
@tompeterson4628 “an example” of what?
1
@AF53501 bro, i dont care what you think
1
@privacyfig I did not quote you, so you remember correctly. I was replying to YOUR desire to grant government investigative power over anything/anything that receives federal funding.
1
@privacyfig and your rhetorical question concerning ad hominem is confusing, can you explain?
1
@privacyfig How was your money taken from you for Penn ?
1
@privacyfig now what were you claiming about ad hominems?
1
@privacyfig false! Its a fact that Russia is authoritarian, which you seem to want for USA. And i was not ignoring any argument you made by asking you a question that turned out to be true!
1
@privacyfig why? Did you sign up for that?
1
@jackstiles458 you should post facts instead of opinions
1
@AF53501 what does “that” refer to?
1
@JustaDudePal kinda vague, got examples?
1
@Valhalla-vk7hf whats the charge?
1
@Valhalla-vk7hf You’ve not provided any proof fir anything you have claimed
1
@kborak your personal opinions are irrelevant, and your claims regarding “what to think” are laughable.
1
@stevensenator4804 You refrence “actual facts” but dont identify them. suspicious
1
@tompeterson4628 why not? Its a free country
1
@Kurtlane Good news! Its not acceptable, in fact all those actions (except insults) are criminal.
1
@Kurtlane now where is your proof of this alleged “zero action”? How can you claim to know everything that every university has done? Its ludicrous
1
@avacigar5502 what are some examples of these “illegal opinions”?
1
@kborak why do you claim “schools dont teach free markets anymore” (paraphrasing
1
@tompeterson4628 “free speech” means one thing : government cannot pass laws that limit expression based solely on the content of said expression What laws are you referring to?
1
@AF53501 examples? I noticed your claim is unsupported
1
@AF53501 Why do you ask?
1
@Valhalla-vk7hf not my problem
1
@AF53501 what do you suggest i “check again”? What are you saying i checked before?
1
@AF53501 who is “we” and what is a “live one”?
1
@kborak keep barking little doggie ! yap yap yap
1
@theastronomer5800 “Palestine (equals) Hamas” ? false equivalence = logical fallacy
1
@newnoggin2 Don’t be swayed by TV soundbites
1
@AF53501 Ive no interest in what you want, nor an I obligated to do so. I am prepared to back any claim i’ve made.
1
@kborak false choice = logical fallacy
1
@trouts4444 wait … “laws against anti-semiticsm ” ? What are some examples?
1
@AF53501 dude i dont care dude
1
@theastronomer5800 yes you did. You grouped them together, making no distinction between them. As for “electing them”, what year was Hamas first elected, and how many times have they been re-elected since? “The answers might surprise you!”
1
Why do you think Governors have the authority to do so?
1
@egosumhomovespertilionem what does “outsized influence” mean, and what metric do you use to measure it?
1
@egosumhomovespertilionem and why must YOU be given the authority to change things to the way YOU want them to be?
1
@grega2362 They have always had that freedom, so whats your point?
1
@KB-ke3fi who is “they” and how are endowments reduced by appearing before Republicans?
1
@nigel.w but none of that is “true”. Opinions can not be true.
1
@shams8327 what are ya waiting for? Stop talking and do it
1
@Gordan19758 who is “they”?
1
@yvonneplant9434 well to be fair, MAGA knows where the football stadium is, and the souvenir shop.
1
@yvonneplant9434 Why?
1
@alansommer who is “they” and when were they arrested?
1
@jmcc2275 No i dont. Youre not my wife
1
@tomw.6757 What does “that” refer to in your sentence fragment?
1
@myphilippineamericanjourne4731 uh oh… ad hominems coming out..
1
@cotedebeaune2012 when was there any “lack of attention to facts”?
1
@joro63 Who are you talking about?
1
@alankwellsmsmba why? Are you claiming men are somehow superior to women? And why would it be hard to “find any” men for the position?
1
@Gordan19758 Why? Please be specific. Tell me what you claim it proves, and how.
1
Funny.. i heard from TWO Bard employees the exact opposite
1
@@DouglasMurrayforPM “yes” to what?
1
@UteHeggenTranswidowHeals OMG my two friends do as well!!! Does “G.R” match your friends initials?
1
@UteHeggenTranswidowHeals so i just looked em up on charityExplorer and they are good! Made $72 million last year, solid endowments close to a billion.
1
Wrong country. Thats not a thing we do in the USA. Google “freedom” for further information
1
Interesting opinions you have but facts would be more appropriate
1
Whats preventing YOU from asking? Why are you asking others to do you a favor? Get off your butt and do it!
1
How is UPenn “dishonest”?
1
@yuckyool When did they “permit hate speech”? And who is Lia Thomas ? What “swim team”? What does BLM have to do with UPenn?
1
@Halo3Matalix Biden does not “give raises” to private citizens or congressmen
1
What are the names of the anti-semites that she asked to speak at Penn?
1
@Timmy1979 this is false : “Federal dollars dictate what is allowed or not allowed to speak”
1
@papayonz the Constitution says government cannot pass any laws that limit expression based solely on the content of said expression. Constitution has nothing to do with Universities or businesses or churches or Nazis deciding what they can say or not say, or who they can invite or not invite to speak.
1
@KH_FYM What exactly are you claiming “there aren’t any” of? I ask because you left out the context
1
You thought wrong! And there is no judge, or jury. Any other incorrect assumptions you wish to share?
1
That opinion of yours is very vague, do you have specific examples?
1
@BearPawSwipe what does “performance” mean in this context?
1
@Musiclover-bg2nn whats their name? Im interested in exploring their influence
1
@cotedebeaune2012 Making vague and unsubstantiated claims do not count as argument. Have you got any specific examples?
1
@RUHappyATM who are you referring to?
1
If you pray on that, non-stop, for a few months im sure you can make your dreams cime true! Seriously, DO NOT WAVER!!
1
@spiritseeker2831 Google “public education”, its this thing we do in America Do you have education in your country? If so, is it all private schools where the students or their parents have to pay tuition?
1
Zero. That has never happened. No one has ever been denied a job at any of “these places” for not being “evil enough”. Or was your question rhetorical?
1
Except that is not, in fact, a fact. That is, in fact, an opinion. And “freedom of speech” per 1st amendment only applies to laws passed by government- nothing to do with anything else, including church cults, militias, white Christain nationalists, Donny Dumper, or university
1
@KH_FYM Based on what?
1
He’s a liar, not a leader.
1
Whats wrong with our collage’s ? Not enough jesso ? Or is it an issue with the scraps/ photos that have been chosen ? Perhaps we need to include more mixed media in them - really up our national efforts in the Collage Olympics coming up!
1
But those are not your decisions to make.
1
@nigel.w define “better” please. And can you explain why you are making baseless claims and typing opinions?
1
@JonathanBotach isnt “woke” bad?
1
@Brick_Tamlin define “it”
1
@JonathanBotach mine? Oh no, its not rhetorical btw - whatever the Trump Party is complaining about is very vague. But they apparently need a catchphrase to rally around, being devoid of any platform or principles (other than god and guns, misogyny, homophobia, hate, fear, bigotry and lying)
1
@Brick_Tamlin You do? Can you take a photo of it for me thanks!
1
@Brick_Tamlin brilliant retort!
1
lotta opinions! But no facts.
1
Morality is subjective, and there is no one in this video that is supporting anti-semitism
1
Very very vague, but your emotions come through very strongly! What are you upset about?
1
For what?
1
Who are you claiming invited Roger Waters to speak? Are you claiming that its illegal to do so?
1
When did that happen? Please provide some examples
1
@kjuarez29 i have, and it does not support you
1
Why do you call them bigots? And why do you object to lawyers? (other than your irrelevant feelz of course)
1
Are you saying you dont like her answers? If so, which ones and why? As long as we are sharing our feelz, i love how angry she makes you, and really enjoy the petulant display of the Republican doofus, screaming at some academic from his high horse. But hey, thats just me. Thanks for listening. Anyone else wanna share your emotions?
1
“Obvious” … to you. But your opinion is not relevant to the views of others who might disagree with your claim
1