Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Is Jesus Historical? What Do The Romans Say About Him?" video.

@johnswanger8474 He's the liberal extremist who is very respectful towards everyone as far as I know but is against feminism to an extent which is why he seems to be an intellectual, since anyone fighting feminazis can look smart. He also talks about the Bible positively while not believing it for real, so he tries to appease both sides.
4
I did a series proving atheism wrong covering a bunch of its history. I cover atheist myths like dinosaurs, the big bang, macro-evolution, abiogenesis, ice ages, millions of years claims, quantum so-called physics and other magical fables. Freethinkers don't mind questioning the establishment. Gullible people mock anyone who does.
4
It's HalleluYAH, not HalleluYEH though.
1
You're all frauds. I excommunicated my entire Protestant and in some cases Catholic family in América because they're hypocrites. The Synagogue of Satan counterfeited Christianity by using Rome and that is how the Roman Catholic church was born, where they have the gullible masses honouring Mary as if she were a goddess (queen of heaven, they call her: a goddess title -no way around it!). Is it idolatry to bow to a robot Jesus? Jesus ignored Mary when he was teaching, and then said that anyone who does God's will is his mother. He referred to her merely as "woman." Catholics don't follow Jesus' example. Jesus said most people go to hell. Catholics say entire countries go to heaven, contradicting Jesus. Jesus said to sell all of your unnecessary stuff to give to the poor, but look how rich the Catholic church is. They worship gold, not really God. Just ask the Catholic Francisco Pizarro. Oh wait. He can't hear you. He's burning in hell right now next to the Incas who sacrificed humans to devils. The true, original Christians in Acts never did anything Catholic like bowing to statue and other pagan shit. Jesus said not to call anyone on earth father. Pope means father for crying out loud. Satan counterfeited the truth to misrepresent Jesus' name. How many atheists and Hindus and Muslims cite the Crusade crimes and such, as reasons to reject the Bible even though the Bible doesn't justify Christians slaying enemies to politically control a city God never told Christians to control?
1
They looked down on his followers for refusing to bow to the emperor as a god. Some Romans must have admired the courage it takes to defy the empire.
1
@dr.zoidberg5096 I met an atheist fanatic who worships Peterson. I once made the mistake of referring to Peterson as "that guy."
1
Nietzschit ist tot. Gott ist gut.
1
@michaeljohnangel6359 Nietzsche was a pseudo-intellectual as my series on atheist myths proves. He is dead. God is still alive.
1
@michaeljohnangel6359 May be? IS dead. And in hell for ingratitude, lying and pride. Your other point was that one should be an atheist because you quoted positively "God is dead." My series proving atheism wrong and atheist myths wrong also proves the only living real God is YHWH of the Bible. Would it be rational to conclude that a cat walked n a keyboard to type your comment?
1
@michaeljohnangel6359 Unsurprisingly, the atheist fanatic runs away from my question. Checkmate. They pretend to be smarter but they're so easy to trap. Your use of "may" in this context means you're trying to soften the blow of reality that your idol is DEAD meaning he is a loser with zero power. Your euphemistic use of it being pointed out does not make me bad at English. NON SEQVITVR. "invisible friends" Very hypocritical from an atheist fanatic who blindly believes in something more magical than ANY God: that logic came from illogic, alchemy on steroids... and the other alchemy on steroids: slime into Frankenslime. Reason is also invisible which explains why you don't use it. Chance your name from the religious "Michael John Angel" to something suitable like "Kimg Jong Illness Fallen Angel Pawn." LOL!
1
@michaeljohnangel6359 Keep running away from my question, atheist fanatic. Too bad you're one of the atheists no one will remember. Maybe if you grow a ridiculous moustache.
1
@ernestjamesmusic995 Peer review is a bandwagon fallacy and AD VERECVNDIAM fallacy. You also commit a malicious AD HOMINEM fallacy. Can you answer the question your comrade ran away from? "grown ups" don't believe in alchemy like you do (slime into Frankenslime) which makes you a hypocrite. You pretend I'm a kid to feel superior when you haven't proven you're superior but rather that you're irrational at every turn, narcissist.
1
@ernestjamesmusic995 I was an atheist as a baby. I grew up. :-) Look who's the child. But children are innocent, so you are not really child-like in every way.
1
@ernestjamesmusic995 " tantrums" Easily checkmating atheist preachers isn't a tantrum. It's using you for entertainment and to educate people about your ilk and how dishonest and self-righteous and weak you are.
1
@ernestjamesmusic995 "don't respond." Because you can't answer my question either. So easy to checkmate the atheist zealots. :-)
1
@ekosulis5772 Isaiah prophesied Jesus before he appeared as a baby in Judea. He wasn't made a God. He always was God.
1
@emmanuelucrosacosta1845 Why do you attack what I say without refuting anything? The argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't even scratch my series.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 You didn't prove that the alleged dinosaur fossils are real. Fake fossils are a big business. You are just gullibly trusting the establishment like I used to do when I was a boy and was mislead by Barney which is also homosexual propaganda.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 When was your self-coronation, dictator of youtube? There's nothing wrong with people helping them see that atheism is insanity akin to believing that a tornado could make a house.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 Mythmatics are just numbers that don't necessarily exist in reality. The big bang is not proven but easily proven wrong by constellations that have not changed in THOUSANDS of years! So the universe never violently expanded as claimed. Diffraction explains redshift. Your time "exploded myth" is of no worth. The FSM monster is as good an explanation for CMB radiation as the big bang myth, or actually, better since less irrational elements are involved. The big bang says gravity was too weak to keep gases together but then later on magically acquired super-steroids to bring them together to form stars. Nonsense. No consistency in your atheist creation myth.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "all of the mechanisms of abiogenesis barring one are well-understood and more than plausible," This mere talk is not evidence for abiogenesis. Not proof. Not a plausible falsification scenario to prove it is even a scientific explanation. This is just empty rhetoric trying to over up your TOTAL LACK OF EVIDENCE since amino acids don't count or else so do FARTS since both are found in living things, and both are TOTALLY NON-LIVING! You're like someone saying "We have seen gingers and midges so leprechauns are more than plausible." You believe in alchemy more magical than lead into gold, magic boy. You don't have the right to ridicule others' beliefs.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "the ice ages show up in our fucking rocks," No, that's a lie. The establishment wants you to interpret scratches on rock walls as due to imagined glaciers that supposedly existed aeons ago, but there are other ways of interpreting the evidence, such as a Great Flood moving boulders across the walls. But you never think outside the box. You believe only whatever the establishment tells you to believe. Atheist fanatics are gullible non-free-thinkers.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 Guy. All I said is he should consider questioning atheist propaganda. It's not a fornicating invitation for you to preach your atheist shit. Kindly use logic next time. :-)
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "and quantum physics literally powers quantum computers" So putting a sticker saying "quantum" on a computer that functions according to Newtonian physics proves quantum physics is real physics? NON SEQVITVR fallacy by the gullible atheist preaching for others to be as credulous as him. Quandumb is pseudo-science because it is based on a misinterpretation of the double-slit experiment where they see different patterns based on observation versus none, and conclude that conscious observation makes the difference when it is actually just that to detect radiation, you have to send radiation to hit the radiation, which is what alters its course ACCORDING TO NEWTONINAN PHYSICS, such that the experiment meant to prove your spooky pseudo-science, actually supports the creationist Isaac Newton's real science. :-) LOL! But of course an atheist fanatic like you would NEVER think for himself and see evidence from a different point of view than the one the establishment says he should believe., a racist establishment that tells you to believe subhuman blacks were a thing... PAH! And quandumb is so dumb it contradicts itself, since it says that everything is dead and alive at the same time, real and not real, true and false, at the same time. So quandumb says that quandumb is false ! LOL! And are you a rapist? No? Well, quandumb says you are.... because you're not! LOL! You buy into such nonsense.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE PART OF ATHEISM," Strawman fallacy. I never said they were parts of atheism. I say they are atheist myths meaning ways to explain things without God and which contradict the Bible such as your alchemy fable about slime becoming Frankenslime which you blindly believe with no evidence because you don't care about evidence. " atheism is simply a lack of belief in god or gods." A God is a Mind, so to doubt Mind is the Origin is to embrace the only alternative: mindlessness. There's a reason mindless erosion never makes a sandcastle. Science says mind is necessary, let alone for higher order, so science shits on atheism. :-) And why do you not bow to Mecca? It's because you're an atheist. Atheism has many implications, but atheist fanatics lie in denial because they are indefensible, such as "nature made me do it" justifying all evil.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 Mr. "Slime became Frankenslime but don't ask me for proof" is calling me delusional. LOL! Where's your proof, atheist fanatic? Do you even have a shred of evidence? :-) Hahaha!
1
@Eirik_Bloodaxe "Odin shall guide them" Vikings were creationists who would look down on the atheist feminazis who don't know how many genders there are, defiling their Scandinavia today, so insane as to import Islam to rape their countries. LOL! Scandinavian religion is false because their gods are selfish but you know the real Creator isn't since he cares for us as proven by the gifts given us such as your hands you use to hypocritically type a defense for an atheist who began being rude in this thread, yet you bash me for defending myself. Double standards prove you're evil.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 Mr. Sense comes from nonsense accuses me of having "nonsense." Such hypocrisy and delusion. After saying he won't argue, he argues. More hypocrisy. [[[ "Constellations that have not changed in thousands of years" is enough to prove that you have no fucking clue. ]]] You talk a lot of shit but you haven't proven ANYTHING. Prove constellations changed. The ancients pointed to Orion. Is Orion here today? Lo and behold, it is, proving the universe did not explode as you BLINDLY and GULLIBLY believe, magic boy! :-) A scientific theory has to be falsifiable. Give a plausible falsification scenario for your time-exploded fiction, to prove it is even a scientific guess.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "you belong in an institution" Spoken like a North Korean atheist fanatic. You and them are the same except they have the power to murder me and you don't. You blindly believe the origin of genius is mindlessness. That's the (EDIT:a)theist position: that MAYBE that is the origin of origins, instead of a Supreme Mind. You're the crazy one. :-) Atheists like you are just bullies who insult as "crazy" yet run away when their atheist myths are exposed for the nonsense that they are. Atheism spread by the bloody French Revolution and communist holocausts, never by reason. "no time for lunatics." Look at these ad hominems your atheist comrade turns a blind eye to, yet he accused me of ad homineming. Atheist preachers have no honour. You believe you are just animals which explains why you act accordingly.
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "how in the hell does the scientific understanding of the world around us have ANYTHING to do with the validity of atheism." I never said your side is scientific. That's YOUR circular reasoning. I proved your side is NOT scientific. For example, you claim the universe exploded. You have no proof. Diffraction explains redshift, so the big bang is unnecessary garbage. And you still haven't provided a plausible falsification scenario for it to prove it is even a scientific explanation. Constellations in antiquity are the same today. You are proven wrong just by one second looking at the night sky! LOL!
1
@mateuszjokiel2813 "I'm not even gonna argue your nonsense." Impotent paper tiger. Barks a lot. Can't bite to save his inflated ego. :-)
1
@emmanuelucrosacosta1845 Thanks for fulfilling my prediction: "Freethinkers don't mind questioning the establishment. Gullible people mock anyone who does."
1
@Eirik_Bloodaxe Atheist tube? What cancerous page of the internet is that? I see atheist tube all the time. Atheists always make the comments section atheist tube by preaching that belief in Intelligence is stupid, which is just them saying how unintelligent they are, and that they wish to get away with evil when they die which is the real reason they're atheist preachers.
1
@dennist8290 They were invented to try to discredit the history of Noah's Ark by there being too many creatures to fit, and some as big as the ark itself....
1