Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "The Last Duel: HALF HELMET? What On Earth!?" video.

They'll use Joan of Arc to promote lying about your gender like Pissney did with Mulan.
51
@omarabe26 Disney teaches kids to rebel against parents. This is why my daughter won't be watching that shit which promotes devil worship like when Cinderella called Lucifer "your highness" or "majesty." There's a motif of apple-biting by the protagonists, celebrating rebellion. Disney was an elite mason who worshipped Satan. His Club 33 matches the number of degrees in masonry.
20
"Thine spawn origin featureth plentious girth to the point of casting her rotund shadow upon the sunne in an eclipse of artifice craft." Glad there was no rap crap jargon to make things uncool back then.
13
Hellywood corrupts all it touches.
7
@jordinagel1184 I never said that, liar. I said THIS, with proof you chose to omit for your underhanded deceitful tactic: [[[ promotes devil worship like when Cinderella called Lucifer "your highness" or "majesty." ]]] So you committed these fallacies: 1. Strawman, distorting my position. 2. Argument from incredulity fallacy, saying only someone on drugs would say as I said. 3. AD HOMINEM fallacy attempting to discredit me, yet you are impotent to do so.
3
@jordinagel1184 I did not deny that I said Pissney promotes devil worship, liar. Of course I said that! I said you OMITTED my proof when you put words in my mouth to replace the proof since I NEVER said this sentence: "Disney promotes devil worship among youngsters” You edited my sentence, taking out the proof, and put words in my mouth I never uttered nor typed: "among youngsters." You are a liar, and you got caught. You an atheist? Agnostic? What did I say that got you so upset you had to lie about what I said?
3
@blitcut9712 You keep running from my questions. I'll wait for you to answer them if you want me to answer your new round of fallacies. Don't act dumb. You know where they are, but you are just stalling. You're already checkmatd and lost. I shouldnn't waste my time addressing endless assertions from you when you keep running away. Stop stalling.
3
@blitcut9712 PS You're a hypocrite because you told me: "I see no point in answering your arguments if you refuse to address mine." I know why you're scared, and I know you can't do anything about it because I won't let you get away with running away. Atheists always melt when challenged.
3
@rayzhang7591 You're expecting me to believe that the deity the Chinese Emperor worshipped did not have to be honoured (AKA worshipped) by his subjects? Makes zero sense. You're just an atheist trying to hide the religious history of your nation, lying about it like if modern Egyptians claimed it was only the Pharaohs who worshipped Ra. The Temple of Heaven is a testament to how wrong you are.
2
@jordinagel1184 Would you let a child under your authority watch child porn? Would it be rational to conclude that a cat walked on a keyboard to type your posts? You're afraid to say if you're an atheist, but this can pry out your identity. Disney influenced me to be a brat when I was kid. So my younger past is proof that watching selfish behaviour often in a positive or tolerant light, is detrimental to morality. You pretend you did not omit my proof that Satan worship is promoted by Pissney. Your false "quote" of me is soemthing I did not say, and even if it were just a paraphrase (with misleading quotation marks), that is still a distortion of my position because you dishonestly chose to OMIT the proof for my claim, making a scarecrow version of me so you can take it down to beat your chest like you accomplished something. "Lion King is absolutely going to turn children satanic." More selfish sense of satanic? Yes. Devil worshippers? Not necessarily. You're LYING again if you meant the latter which is probably what you meant.
2
@robsanchez2038 The pope uses the Templar cross. A French Catholic king once persecuted the Templars, but they got revenge as commemorated on the Tarot card called "Death." You see the pope begging for mercy before the Templar's dead knight. You see the dead king on the ground. So they took over Catholicism. The Templar cross has 8 points, and it refers to the Star of Ishtar of 8 rays, and that points to Babylon, the land of the Tower of Babel where mankind united against God to try to conquer heaven (a motif in role-playing games). Templars became masons, and they are building the pyramid you see on the masonic dolar bill with 1 eye on top. It is a refernece to the new Tower of Babel, the one world government to be led by the Anti-Christ. Catholics work for him. The Bible says the Anti-Christ shall lose an eye which is why there is one eye on the pyramid in the dollar and in myriad media situations and logos. All corporations are controlled by the modern Templars (elite masons). All countries too. This plandemic is their doing under the direction of the Elders of Zion. Read the Protocols. They predict and explain reality perfectly. They are said to be a hoax, but never proved to be a hoax.
2
@blooperman1997 I know ignorance outnumbers knowledge, "champ." You didn't give me any logical argument, just your opinion that I'm wrong. You really are "Sad Boy Gerald." :-)
2
@blitcut9712 "The galaxy is held together through gravity" Then why did gravity not keep the particles together in the first place preventing an explosion? Yet you accuse me of not applying my standards across the board. Gravity won't change power levels to suit your narrative. Also, gravity would bring the moon into the earth and both into the sun, but that doesn't happen, and you take these orderly systems for granted. You're like someone saying "My car engine exploded into existence. I just threw the materials in, and they arranged themselves by gravity." You're crazy, atheist bully who called me crazy. You hypocrite. "What exactly causes the diffractions that would explain red light?" Redshift isn't synonymous with red light. You don't even know what redshift is. Don't argue about what you don't understand. The farther stars redshift because there is more space debris like dust particles in the way of their light, between them and us. "an assumption based on observation." Just like astrology is an assumption based on observing stars. :-) "I can't really adress any arguments because you're basically not making any." Liar, liar, to be on fire. "You asume that just because an explanation would work that it must be true." Strawman fallacy. It's not just that it workds, but that it's the ONLY key that works to open the door of reality. I explained already. You have no answers, atheist. You can't bash the only answers that work. You just lie saying they don't without refuting anything I say, and while running from my questions.
2
@blitcut9712 YT doesn't let me post long comments most of the time; deletes them automatically 'cause the people who run this website are irrational. "intermediary steps does give a good indication that there is something to it." Bullshit. Your imagination isn't science. You're no different than soeone saying "We found a ginger hair near a rainbow, and this proves leprechauns can come from rainbows. That ginger hair is a good indication that there is something to it...." "not fully proven." It's not proven at all, liar. Or is a gigner hair near a rainbow semi-proof that leprechauns are real? LOL! HYPOCRITE. "Explaining death is easy. When things happen to life forms that prevent a lot of the chemical stuff that keeps the body running the system collapses and the lifeform dies." You didn't explain why death exists. You just described what death is. Moving the goalposts. Now answer my questions or I'm done reading your shit, bully atheist who found out too late that I make prey out of predators: "Would it be rational to beleive a cat walked on a keyboard to type your atheist propaganda?" You still run away. Atheist are so WEAK in debate. They're all just bullies but have no substance, no logic, no facts, ever. "Is it an absolute truth that there are no absolute truths?"
2
@markusblake7936 Thank you although I don't feel worthy since I know the mistakes I have made.
2
@rayzhang7591 You're right that the ancient Chinese were polytheists, not atheists. That still makes them creationists. I never meant that Shang Di was synonymous with YHWH despite similarities. Communist China tried to hide or erase many creationist elements in Chinese language which is the real reason for their simplified script which ironically complicates things since now anyone wanting to learn Chinese such as me, has to learn more systems: the beautiful traditional script, and the watered-down form. "he is at best, a personified aspect" Historical revisionism. That's like saying the hieroglyphs were all symbolic, and no ancinet Egyptians actually worshipped gods, but rather promoted IDEAS with personifications.
1
@robsanchez2038 Again...China would have no problem with the Hunchback depicting the bad guy as religious. And notice that Jordi Nagel ran away from my last round of arguments. Liberals can't defend their evil positions.
1
@rayzhang7591 Mao Zedong said the Chinese are expendable. Atheism is the worst thing that ever happened to China. Communists murdered millions in a holocaust to dwarf the Holocaust. See serpentza and laowhy86 channels covering more of how degraded China became thanks to communism which they never say is atheistic to not offend many of their viewers with the truth. My series on the history of atheism covers some quotes from Mao Zedong, and refutes atheist myths like the big bang.
1
@robsanchez2038 Catholics aren't Christians since they reject the Bible when it says not to make graven images, and when it says not to do prayer mantras, and when it says there is 1 Mediator between God and man, which they refuse to accept since they believe Mary is another one, since they idolize her.
1
@robsanchez2038 If they believed in him, they would obey him. They NEVER do. Statue of Jesus or the Anti-Christ disguised as "Jesus"? Jesus didn't have long hair. That's a reference to Baphomet (androgynous male with female hence long hair being the female aspect). Yes, they reject the Bible but unwittingly. Jesus said not to do prayer mantras. Catholics do them anyway. Jesus said not to call anyone on earth father (in the sense of with spiritual authority), but Cahtolics have a pope which means father whom they claim has spiritual authority. Jesus said he did not come to abolish the Law that ofrbids making images of anything in heaven or on earth to bow to as if they were divine, but Mary-worshipping heretics don't care what Jesus says. They put man-made traditions above God's word just like the Pharisees Jesus criticized so vehemently.
1
@robsanchez2038 Disney owns Narnia I think, and that's a red flag. I saw the movie with the girl Lucy(fer) going to a light post bearing light (LVCIFER means light bearer) and found by a goatman (Baphomet) who takes the girl into his home where he uses a flute resembling a forked tongue (devil's the Serpent) to lull her to sleep, and a lion roars from the fire (both of which are symbols of Satan too).
1
@vitorhenrique5229 You think it's all right to indoctrinate children to rebel against parents which Disney always does. You're against yourself. That's called insanity. Beauty and the Beast is about loving Satan. It's right there in your face that it's a BEAST. :-) Gaston is also a beast by the way. Disney says to not care about appearances but then hypocritically says that Esmeralda marries the handsome guy and rejects the ugly one! LOL! You hate that someone says the truth about Disney 'cause you have an emotional attachment to it. You like the PG Disney version of reality rather than the grim one. And I can let my daughter enjoy some Disney music without lyrics, since some of the music is great and not satanic. But you don't discriminate. If they say it's for children, you say "sure thing!" If a babysitter claims toj bee honest, you say "sure thing!" Then she teaches them to rebel against you, and you dont' ind? You PAY them to sow seeds of rebellion? Don't pity my daughter for my plan to protect her. Pity yourself that you are against yourself.
1
@blitcut9712 "crazy" doesn't prove me wrong. it proves you're evil because you insult someone who did you no wrong, and that you are illogical beause an AD HOMINEM fallacy is the best you an do. LOL! Paper tigers. "hail Satan" You'll regret that when you're in the lake of fire.
1
@blitcut9712 Well, I believe you when you say you're not here to be logical (debate) in disagreement. I already provved the Bible right in mys eries crushing atheism and atheist myths. :-) Your argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't cut it. And logic always applies whether or not you are interested in or capable of using it, so it WAS an AD HOMINEM.
1
@blitcut9712 You: "Hell isn't real." Believes in alchemy, life from nonlife! LOL!HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA! Atheist fanatics are such hypocrites! Justice for all is a myth, but not alchemy on steroids! (To them) In high school long ago they tried to indoctrinate me to be an atheist, and they cited the Miller Experiment which was a TOTAL FAILURE since even AFTER they CHEAT by intelligently designing an experiment to try to prove that intelligent design is not necessary, there was STILL zero life from non-life, just amino acids which aren't evidence or else so would a fart be since both are found in living things. Hahahah!.. You're the crazy one for believing in alchemy which has no evidence. You're crazy also for believing that Disney is'nt satanic which I already proved it is in this thread. Rejecting proof is insanity; delusion. Atheist delusion is a huge cancer in the liberal world of feminazis, communists and other crazies who wish there is no hell because they want to get away with being selfish (evil) when they die.
1
@blitcut9712 "No argument" You admit you gave no argument, no logic, no facts, no substance... for your malicious accusation that I am crazy. Thank you for defeating yourself, atheist. Here's a question your comrades run away from: Would it be rational to beleive a cat walked on a keyboard to type your atheist propaganda?
1
@blitcut9712 "Logical is up to interpretation." No. It's up to facts which is why you didn't provide any for your slander against me. Your relativism is showing. Here is the question to defeat that view if blindness could be called a view: Is it an absolute truth that there are no absolute truths? Your doubt is irrelevant. I DID prove the Bible right, and my arguments in the series in my channel are still standing. If the heat is too much for you, then get out of the kitchen. ARGVMENTVM AD HOMINEM is what you committed because you were implying I am wrong because I am "crazy" in your worthless opinion. When I say you had no argument, I meant you had no logical argument.
1
@blitcut9712 "It's not cheating because they limited themselves to what could've happened naturally" PETITIO PRINCIPII fallacy that the situation would have come into place without intelligent design at all. Atheists can't even account for a single star forming let alone planets with water for your slime into Frankenslime falbe to have a stage to perform the magical act. The big bang is proven wrong by constellations that never changed in THOUSANDS OF YEARS proving the universe never exploded. Diffraction explains redshift. No need for the big bang. And they're ASSUMING a situation, not proving anything. Assumptions are not science. They provided no life from non-life. They failed miserably. :-) Your alchemy is still absurd fiction despite your great level of blind faith. You cheat by not starting at the starting line which is explaining where all of this matter came from in the first place.
1
@blitcut9712 "While amino acids are themselves not life, their creation do prove that life could've happened naturally" NON SEQVITVR fallacy. An experiment resulting in zero life proves life. LOL! Your imagination isn't science. "because amino acids can react chemically in such a way that they create what we would call life." In your imagination. Again, that isn't science. You have ZERO evidence for your atheist alchemy creation mythology, so you're a hypocrite to call me crazy.
1
@blitcut9712 "Where is the evidence for the Christian God?" You don't care about evidence because I already pointed to my series where I proved the Bible right which you're still running away from. I don't say Bible therefore God. I point to empirical evidence like that man is unique in the universe which the Bible explains perfectly as well as why death exists Atheists have no rational answers. "Space therefore aliens" is a NON SEQVITVR fallacy akin to "Space therefore flying spaghetti monster aliens," and "Rainbows therefore leprechauns." A false god like the Muslim one is known to be false because he contradicts himself: "I am most merciful. But I would never die for you." LOL! God gave us great gifts like eyes and hands (suffering and lacking are due to the Fall of Man), and no evil deity would give us these things, for they prove that the Divine cares for us ergo is just ergo is not unjust like the adulterer Zeus.
1
@blitcut9712 "I see no point in answering your arguments if you refuse to address mine." I asked you first, and I also easily dealt with your question, impatient one who WISHES he could have a question I'd be afraid of. You're running away form my questions. You have no honour with such cowardice: "Would it be rational to beleive a cat walked on a keyboard to type your atheist propaganda?" You still run away. Atheist are so WEAK in debate. They're all just bullies but have no substance, no logic, no facts, ever. "Is it an absolute truth that there are no absolute truths?"
1
@blitcut9712 "You did do me wrong with your schtick about atheism." What schtick? Don't pretend atheists are immune from scrutiny. You guys are the worst murderes in history when you have the communist hats on. There are also non-communist atheists like the terrorists at Columbine.
1
@blitcut9712 You still run from my questions. You already lost. I am clarifying how lost. "don't know what petitio principii is." I do, liar. Your mere assertion has just been negated with the contradiction. Do better than that, because you make this too easy. "matter slowly gathering together through gravity and forming stars eventually." Your imagination isn't science, and gravity was too weak to keep things together in the first place in that imaginary scenario, so the only thing it could do is reel them back into a big crunch after ages if there's no heat death, so not even 1 star would form! LOL! You can't even have 1 star form, and you STILL can't explain any of the material to begin with you start with as a cheater starting past the starting line. Diffraction necessarily causes redshift according to science, but you reject science. "Constellations do move" Stars in them have remained static for thousands of years, liar. That's how we can see the same figures ancients saw. If the universe exploded they would have gone off course well within in a century and disfigured the constellations. Comets move within an hour yet are very far away, so your pretext of distance doesn't work especially since constellations had THOUSANDS OF Y EARS to be disfigured byt he expansion you believe in because you're gullible and not a free thinker.
1
@blitcut9712 "You ask where all the matter came from. Well where did God come from?" Instead of answering my question, you deflect. So weak. God needs no origin because he is not a natural explanation, and the reason we know natural things need an origin is by the law of cause & effect, but thats a natural law so it must apply only to natural things, not supernatural ones. To argue otherwise is akin to saying "Rugby players msut use golf clubs. It's the rules!" "You claim man is unique in the universe. First of all where is your evidence for that?" Your blindness is disturbing. Even your side admits man is unique by calling us HOMO SAPIENS which means WISE MAN. We are unique by our intellectual power which most people apparently don't tap into but they have it by default. Also, you have no footage of aliens, so don't pretend they're not in the same category as leprechauns. Man IS unique, and only a sci-fi guy like you would look at the emptiness of the cosmos and say "Endless lack of life means life out there." LOL! Topsy-turvy insanity. "Secondly, why does the bibles explanation have to be the correct one for that?" I already explained how Islam and Greek mythology and similar religions with selfish gods are wrong. "Your entire schtick is (logic) rules for me not for thee." Strawman fallacy. I'm not a hypocrite like you who demands evidence yet you have none for your alchemy shit. :-) LOL! A theory in science must be falsiffiable. What is a plausible falsification scenario for abiogenesis, and one for the big bang, to prove that your insane magical creation myths are actually scientific explanations instead?
1
@blitcut9712 "would take hours" You've been stalling for over a day, so you have plenty of time to waste. And if you can't handle the heat, debate isn't for you. Don't start what you refuse to finish. You have no excuse. You're just a coward. Game over. The checkmates have solidified. You had your chances. Too many, actually. Thanks for wasting my time. I won't read more of your lies and propaganda. Who's next?... :-)
1
@Dwarfplayer What a hilarious and original joke reflecting on your high level of intelligence. Won't read more, gullible non-free-thinker. And psychiatry is pseudo-science as my series crushing atheist myths proves.
1
@-Zevin- YOur AD HOMINEM fallacy is the opposite of friendly, hypocrite. Instead of attacking the man, how about dealing with my argumennts? Oh, yu can't. YOu're jsut a paper tiger who is a hypocrite for anotehr reason since you are also a conspiracy theorist since you believe, don't you, in the official story of how WW1 began: by a conspiracy of assassination. You're so gullible you don't question what you're taught, and attack anyone who is a free thinker. Advice non-mate. You came off in this comment chain like someone who is totally midnless. LOL
1
@ishitrealbad3039 The Dark Age is a misnomer. The modern age of covidiots is a darker age.
1
@waltonsmith7210 Ironic coming from a truthphobe like you.
1
@richardmangelmann4975 "a simple fantasy" Superficial, you are. There is a reason for everything. "searching for sign supporting ur belief" Nah. I just recognize reality. You are searching for there to be no sign.
1
Glad there are NOBLE ONES in Italy protesting the mass poisoning campaign of the masonic governments. The reason that you have half a visor there is for the same reason masons put one eye on the dollar bill. It is a symbol for the Anti-Christ whom they work for, preparing the world to embrace him as their "saviour." The Bible says the Anti-Christ shall lose his right eye. Even the unholy Quran says that the Dajjal wil be one-eyed. This is also why they designed Jessica Rabbit to have hair covering an eye entirely, and why the boss in Wario World is one-eyed, and why Kirby fights a one-eyed storm, and why in Metroid, Samus has been depicted with only one eye showing through the visor, and why Terminator posters highlight one eye with a red light, and why in Mel Gibson's movie about the Anti-Christ he uses shadows to keep one eye covered much of the time... It's endless the amount of evidence for this. Of course, I am going to be mocked by idiots who commit the argument from incredulity fallacy in hypocrisy since they are ALSO conspiracy theorists for they almost certainly believe in the theory about the conspiracy of the Black Hand to assassinate the Archduke of Austria-Hungary which began World War 1. The difference between us is that they are cowards who believe in conspiracy theories only when they're POPULAR because they suffer from the herd mentality and maybe are just too stupid to think outside the box so they always let the establishment do the "thinking" for them.
1