Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "NativLang" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9.  @PC_Simo  "What does mind being independent of physics (or whatever you said)" That's exactly what I said. "have to do with guilt (and other emotions) being real?" That you are aware of your freedom to think proves for you that guilt can be objectively real because choice is real, and guilt requires choice being real. If we were just bags of flesh without spirit, then guilt would be impossible because "nature made me rape." No, subjective notions of guilt are irrelevant. The issue is objective guilt. Also, science never says macro-evolution is real. Science proves it wrong as I explain in my video "atheists are INSANE and anti-science." :-) "Finally, please leave pagans alone." The pagan attacked MY position, and because I defend my position, you dishonestly portray me as the bully. You're also a pagan, blinded by prejudice. My ancestors were pagans, and I am not proud, so I admit they were ignorant. I'm Spanish, and Spaniards are pagans be they atheists or Catholic heretics. "world-wide melting pot," The world is a zoo where birds of a feather flock together. Melting pots are just those places where the whites are being slowly replaced. "We need to defend the individuality and uniqueness of different cultures, and Christianity is not a way to do it, as far as I can see." My pending video proving that Catholics, "Orthodox" and Protestants are heretics will explain that you dn't even know what Christiannity is. Satan has many false flag operations to bring the name of Jesus into disrepute to mislead those who gullibly take the "they claim to be so they are" definition of Christian. A Finn, eh? I saw a video of one chasing a bear. You're like Russians but more aggressive. I know the Catholic heretics did crusades in the Baltic. You hate my religion because of what heretics did.
    2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @PC_Simo  Genetic evolution is a physical thing, so it can NEVER determine the mind which is FREE to think ergo NOT A SLAVE TO PHYSICS ergo: not physical. Your blind faith in materialism is showing. Science never says science is the only way to know the truth. That's just atheist DOGMA. And since the free mind is not in bondage by anything physical, then genetic evolution could never have made man come from any creature of a different level of intelligence, which proves we were created as we are more or less except that (micro)evolution was made for us to be a bit flexible with our environments but all races remain intellectually equal, something your paradigm doesn't allow which makes you a racist. Darwin was. He wanted all non-Europeans to be "exterminated." They of course didn't tell you that when they indoctrinated you to believe he had a noble agenda. You say the mind is predetermined by physics 'cause we can't think certain things into existence but that's irrelevant and moving the goalposts because the issue isn't about creating anything physical with our minds. The issue is if we can think or not, and we clearly can which means we are free to think ergo free from physics and not like dominos in a domino chain as your paradigm (which justifies all evil by precluding guilt) would have it. By that implication, atheism is objectively worse than Nazism. :-) Your very lie that there is no evidence for God IS evidence for God from the endless examples I can give 'cause you're like God in that I have not seen you yet you know it is rational to believe you exist, and that your atheist propaganda wasn't typed unintentionally by a cat. " No, it wouldn’t be rational, as long as we have other more likely options." You have asserted that there is a chance a cat typed what you did. Is there also a chance that you are a reincarnation of Hitler's final turd? And that a sandcsatle could erdode into existence? You have a lot of blind faith in mindlessness-of-the-gaps while preaching against what you know is rational: Mind-did-it. YOu know it's rational 'cause you said the aleernative isn't in compraison. So you're a hypocrite. When the order level is puny like your comments, you say it is rational to conclude a mind did it without having to see the person typing it. But when order is greater exceedingly, then you say there is"no evidence" for that Creator Mind.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1