Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "" video.

"No one is hated more than he who speaks the truth." -Plato
10
Liberal extremists are truthphobes.
8
WE-eeeellll... he DOES have an ideological agenda: Britain first. That's why he says a pirate is not a pirate, but an honourable man.
3
@Random Thought If Washington were here, I'd insult him more. A man claiming to follow Jesus but who actually serves Satan is a heretic who must be exposed for their heresy as per 1st Corinthians 5. And if someone says Stalin was bad, do you also complain? Not a rhetorical question.
2
@Random Thought Of the many things the British did, burning the US capital was one of the good ones. :-) The US got independent in part thanks to Spain, and then later they do an inside job on the Maine to blame Spain, and make sure the terms rhyme for good propaganda! Later the US would do another inside job, on 911.
2
@msr4455 It's not common sense to see a pirate and call him good. That's ideology. Also, false dichotomy fallacy there.
2
Stop insulting snowflakes comparing them to liberal fanatics.
2
I noticed bitchute has some good videos though they also have dumb ones like blind patriot US videos depicting the US as originally good when it never was. It was established by devil worshippers like the traitor Washington.
1
I used to allow free speech in my channel but then my enemies took advantage of that to endlessly insult me, lie about what I say and lie about me as well as distract from the message of my video, and I don't tolerate idiot parades in my living room any longer. So now they call me a coward. Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. I still let people comment, but I delete insults and total garbage posts like someone yesterday merely saying "It's funny how wrong this video is." He doesn't even try to give an argument. Liberalism is poison. Read The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion.
1
@somebloke13 I'm not a communist. Nothing I said was pro-communist, or do you believe the world is only communist VS British? LOL
1
@gracecollins8415 Drake went around the world long after my people did so first. Spain had a bigger empire than the British unless you count oceans of snd butn ot oceans, which is hypocrisy.
1
@charleswhite9205 This man says mostly good things, so I'm his subscriber. I don't need to leave just so you can have a comfort bubble safe zone like liberals do.
1
@msr4455 You didn't prove I don't understand the term I used. I see the British are angry that their "hero" is exposed as a pirate. A spade is a spade.
1
@msr4455 "considered 'good' overall by many people." Of course people with low standards can call an overrated pirate, thief and murderer good. The most famous pirate is British Blackeard. Your nation is pirate island.
1
@gracecollins8415 If you want to learn how the British helped spread liberalism through Darwin's fiction, see my series crushing atheist myths. Darwin was worse than Hitler. He wanted all non-Europeans to be "exterminated."
1
@homecomingday I did a video proving slavery isn't wrong, and that atheists and other liberal fanatics who claim the Bible is evil because it condones of slavery, are hypocrites.
1
@msr4455 Now you're backpedaling from accusing me of not knowing the meaning of my term, to asking me to clarify. You're desperately attempting to turn the tables accusing me of fallacies now just because I point out your hero was a villain. All words potentially hvae emotional attachment for people out there, so all arguments are fallacious then by your standard you don't apply acorss the board. 'cause you're a hypocrite. :-) Your side begged the question first by saying he wasn't a pirate. Is saying the sky is blue also a fallacy? Again you are a hypocrite. Anyone who doesn't have the Briitsh or other Anglo flag as a blindfold could see that a guy stealing from the SPanish Empire was a pirate. I didn't think I needed to spoon feed you, but you need training wheels.
1
@vladtheimpala5532 Alluding to the guy this uploader mentioned in another video isn't trying to be cryptic. You're very dramatic.
1
@homecomingday The Portuguese allied with England out of fear of Castilla. The fools should never have trusted in pirates, as the pirates betrayed them with the African Ultimatum stealing their entire trade routes, and kicking them out of there! :-) I never said slavery is wrong. Only liberal hypocrites say that. Can you kill a Nazi without being a murdferer for it? Then why would forcing them to clean dishes be evil?
1
@vladtheimpala5532 "I don’t really need to know what you were talking about." Aye. And I was talking about the one whose name is dragon 'cause he was of the devil: Sirloin Franny Drakey. I shan't refer to the knave as a sir, for knights are supposed to be chivalrous, and pirates, my dear boy, are the antithesis of chivalrous.
1
@msr4455 Lady. I thought you were British, yet your English needs work. "All words do not have the same emotional impact by any stretch of the imagination" First of all, that's a strawman fallacy since I never said that ALL words have the SAME emotional impact, you liar. Secondly, you probably meant to say "Not all words have the same emotional impact." [[[ using emotional words "specifically intended" to win an argument.]]] All words in arguments are specifically intended to win the argument. Otherwise they'd be totally irrelevant. Another desperate attempt to have a point is your saying that it is a fallacy to call a man who steals treasure, a "pirate." Using English properly isn't a fallacy, silly. It doesn't matter that England envied my people since the English didn't have the balls to cross the Atlantic. Pirates are still pirates. NON SEQVITVR fallacy there, miss. Double entendre there. :-) You're so desperate you resort to saying pirates can be honourable. LOL! So Somali pirates can be honourable too? Well, as an exception to the rule of their dishonourable lives, yes. Perhaps one can say "bless you" when their captives sneezed. Very honourable! LOL!
1
@msr4455 English isn't irrelevant to your attempting to defend an English pirate since you're trying to say the English are great, when you don't even know this language well with such a mistake as confusing "not all" with "all are not." "You absolutely are implying that all words have equal emotional potential," I never did, liar. You're trying to put an implication in my mind that was never there, based on your WISH, not reality. "you’re making no distinctions" No need to spoon-feed you, I thought. "could rewrite" Red herring fallacy. [only word that matters is “dumb”] No; others help for clarity. "not have been such a bad thing 400 YEARS AGO." Another red herring. Plus a bandwagon fallacy. False equivalency fallacy between calling a thief of treasure ships a pirate, and liberals abusing the term racist. " hypothetically possible" Moving the goalposts. Equivocation. Not answering what I asked. Scared. :-) I won't read more of your garbage and lies. You waste my time.
1