Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Indonesia's Silver People Are Hiding a Dark Reality" video.

DCM88 "any form of culling is acceptable. " I notice you refuse to lead by example.
113
@noelstar1456 Yeah. :-) Did you know Bill Gates also loves the idea of killing most of mankind? He is always talking about depopulation, and he promotes vaccination. Mankind never needed vaccines to survive for thousands of years, but suddenly we need to pay for these lest we suffer horribly? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle lived to old age and were healthy last I checked, with never a single vaccine in their lives. The rise of vaccination matches the rise of retardation. They used to put mercury in vaccines. Harmful elements are still in them.
4
@Cheezer3089 "bold assumptions" You're right. I assumed you were free to think. I guess I was wrong to think you can think. My bad. :-) The confirmation you speak (type) of is a materialistic one when immaterial and invisible logic suffices. You are assuming that truth is limited to nature. Science never says nature is all that exists. Your atheist dogma is just an opinion and wishful thinking. You found no flaw in my argument. You just committed an argument from incredulity fallacy. "pseudo science about spirits." I never said spirits are part of science. You don't even understand my argument.
2
@TKitty-pp6gh You're right that Native Americans used vaccines to stop disappearing. Oh wait. They never used vaccines, and the majority of the Spanish-speaking world is Native American. Looks like you cling to a scam. You have to choose between natural deaths until mankind gets immunization by the immune system... OR the guilt of willingly poisoning babies, increasing autism, and forcing everyone to waste money for something that doesn't solve the virus problem but rather EXACERBATES IT by prompting the virus to mutate into a stronger form in order to bypass the vaccine defenses. It is akin to spraying DDT on crops. Are you in favour of that so people don't lose crops to pests?
2
@okyanus97 I was hoping to find an atheist preaching their nonsense, and here you are. I did a series crushing atheist myths. I will prove there is at least one God, right now, and I want you to refute the argument. You will fail. The mind is free to think ergo is not a slave to physics. Free is the opposite of slave. So the mind is not physical. To the mind will continue after death. This proves there is an afterlife. Metaphysical is another way to say supernatural. Since we began to exist, our spirits (minds) had to come from a Great Spirit, at least one God. "Who made God?" is a question I can answer, but first deal with this. Don't change the subject just yet.
1
@Cheezer3089 You also failed the challenge to find a flaw in my argument. I'm not crying. I'm smiling from knowing all atheists in the world can never defeat that argument because to do so would require making slave mean free, turning reality upside-down.
1
@AngryBystander Atheism spread by mass murder and indoctrination such as the bloody French Revolution and communist holocausts. Atheists are bullies, and given enough power, they turn society into something like North Korea, the most atheistic country on earth. Many atheists lie saying that they worship Kim Jong whatever, but that's only figurative worship. They never call him a god.
1
@whatsup9260 You have not proven your atheist dogma that only nature exists, so proof is not limited to materialistic. I gave logical proof, but logic is not good enough for you. You did not find a flaw in my argument. Your position is that the FREE to think mind is actually the SLAVE to physics brain. That means you contradict yourself. You defeat yourself. You believe in the atheist myth of slime becoming Frankenslime. That's more magical than ANYTHING in the Bible! :-)
1
@whatsup9260 Atheist I have no seen tells me to not believe in unseen God. Atheist I have not witnessed tells me intelligent design is nonsense, by intelligently-designing letters in order. Double standard. Why should I believe you exist when a cat could have walked on a keyboard to type your argument from incredulity fallacy?
1
ZaWarudo GUH Life from life isn't nonsense. The atheist alchemy fable of life from non-life, of slime into Frankenslime, is antithetical to experience and logic.
1
@MrBeatboxmasta So you know nothing about Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, to give a very few examples. Time for you to learn history. You don't question what you're taught. You don't think for yourself.
1
@MrBeatboxmasta You're wrong. I don't believe earth is flat. I don't say evolution is fake. I prove macro-evolution is fake in my series crushing atheist myths and atheism itself. Neither do I believe in lizard people. Your AD HOMINEM attacks and circular reasoning are irrational moves. You question nothing you are taught by the atheistic establishment.
1