Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Aztecs vs Spartans - Who Would Win?" video.

  1. América is 1, and the USAIDS isn't even half of it.
    8
  2.  @barbiquearea  Nature didn't exist 15 to 20 thousands years ago. I proved it in my series crushing atheist myths. Glad no glorious civilizations were atheists until North Korea and Chian who have some glory but are still pretty lame.
    2
  3.  @aidanwatson910  Correlation isn't causation.
    2
  4. I plan to learn Tamazight. From a Spaniard in Angkorland.
    1
  5. There were Greek conquistadores serving el Imperio español. Some could have been descendants of the Spartans. Of course, most in Greece today are frauds who WISH they were Greek but are just Slavs.
    1
  6. Samurais are not even mortal. They cannot be beaten. Source: anime.
    1
  7. The Spanish could have learned some náhuatl terms. It goes both ways, señor.
    1
  8. Quality has the price of numerical inferiority. But less is more.
    1
  9.  @jmgonzales7701  Correlation isn't causation. Racists have inferior arguments.
    1
  10. The Spanish fought samurais and beat them. See my video: "A conquistador refutes the 'Metatron' on Samurais VS Spaniards." He claimed there weren't samurais beaten by the Spanish in the north of Filipinas, but I proved he lied.
    1