Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "I Found Him! 10 Years After He Lived in a Train Tunnel - Mole People" video.
-
2
-
1
-
@chaytonhurlow840 "I asked because you referenced that it was in the Bible."
I said: "the Bible prohibits using the cross or anything else, as an image to represent Jesus."
I was obviously referring to: "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:"
A cross falls under "in the earth" and "likeness" of a "thing."
I actually have to spell this out for you, because you're an ignoramus.
Anyone who has read the Bible would know this, and not need me to spoon-feed them, but you need help yet don't value help because you're a self-righteous idiot and Pharisee-like hypocrite.
"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them:"
Even if you don't bow to them, others do. They honour the image for the same reason you do: they associate it with Jesus himself, and treat it as if it were his presence, when it is not with his presence.
You serve the cross by defending it and putting it on a pedestal or wherever you put the cross, like around your neck. Even if you don't have it around your neck, you condone of such behaviour since you say the cross is a Christian symbol even though it represents Satan because it is a cube opened up, and a cube from a certain angle making a hexagon is seen in the planet Saturn which is a match to the false god Saturn and he represents the leader of fallen angels, for the Bible says idols are devils.
"Now you’re back tracking and saying it doesn’t need to be in the Bible for it to be true."
I'm not backpedaling. I showed you where the Bible implicitly says that the cross is forbidden. You just have to connect a few dots. I did it for you since you're too stupid to do it yourself. My argument was that it doesn't have to be explicit. There is no contradicting myself between saying the Bible says something implicitly, and that it doestt' have to be explicit.
"How am I to verify your statement if it is not in the Bible or explicitly explained by the Holy Spirit?"
It IS in the Bible but implicitly regarding the cross itself, as I explained above.
"I do not kneel to the cross, and I do not worship the cross as if it is God."
You don't have to kneel to the cross for you to be sinning by making an image of a likeness of something in the earth to associate with God, which he clearly forbids.
"It’s funny to me that you have the audacity to claim that I worship an idol; you know nothing about me and you have no right to judge me. I kneel to God alone, no symbol."
You're exaggerating. I know plenty about you from the fact you angrily defend having an image to represent Jesus which Catholics and other idolaters do, making you just like them. Catholics also deny worship, yet they treat their images with great respect, because they associate them with God or divinity, even though God forbids doing such things. There's a reason Hebrew is a very abstract language script-wise unlike Egyptian with hieroglyphs. God didn't want Hebrews to use images beyond the few exceptions like the Ark of The Covenant's angelic figures whom anyone bowing to or honouring by treating them as God himself, would have been idolizing, making them worthy of execution.
"I cannot speak for what the Muslims worship either, but I will say that its ludicrous to discount the original based on a counterfeit."
The cross is an ancient pagan symbol before Jesus was walking in the 1st Century, so you don't even know the hisotry of the cross. The supposedly "Christian" symbol isn't the original cross.
"gain, is the Holy Spirit really convicting you to say all this stuff?"
Yes, to help you and others not be mislead by the lie that it's all right to oppose God's will as far as making images to associate with the Divine.
"A little leaven leavens the whole lump."
Hypocrite. You're a statistic of the corrupted lump, since you blindly follow the man-made tradition that nulllifies the word of God, that it's all right to disobey the prohibition on making images to associate with God.
"You do not speak the truth, you speak self righteously."
So when I say a geometric fact, that a cube is a cross folded up, I am lying? No, idiot... you are the liar, and you are the self-righteous one.
"The truth does not provoke me to anger, because I love the truth. False doctrines provoke my anger, and that anger is justified."
SHit stain. You're full of yourself. You've been proven wrong, but are clinging to the lie that because you don't
claim the cross is God himself, that it's all right to honur it as if it were God himself.
"Finally, your last question is utterly stupid."
Stupid is you disobeying God's prohibition on making images to honour as if divine.
"But a snake absolutely has been used to represent God, just like a Goat has been used to represent Jesus. But I don’t think a giant snake should be the universal symbol of Christianity, that would be pointless and unnecessary."
Saying unnecessary isn't the same as saying immoral. So you're equivocating like the coward you are. Be clear. Would it be all right (morally) to do that? After all, if people do as you do, and claim they don't worship it, then who are you to judge them?
Your profile pic is a cross with a sky in the background. This is what you say represents Jesus. You are attributing divinity to the cross. This is idolatry. You don't need to bow to the cross for it to be your idol. To associate it with God when God forbids doing that, is all it takes to be idolatry. You care more about your man-made tradition than God's word, snake.
1
-
1