General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

SCINTILLAM DEI
Invicta
comments

Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Invicta" channel.

Previous
6
Next
...
All

@bosertheropode5443 "What? Darwin wanted all non europeans to be killed? Never heard that before, seems unlikely to me to be honest." The proof is in my series in the section on macro-evolution. I prove it using his own words. You can say unlikely, but I don't gamble and chance is irrelevant when the "improbable" has already been proven. And there's nothing improbable about that. Brits wiped out all Tasmanians calling them "missing links." Darwin was another brother to those murderers.
1
@jimtroy4380 Yes, Iranians are Aryans if they are the white ones as opposed to the Persians of the south. Race is real just as dog breed is real. Is chihuahua a mere social label? No. Same with races.
1
@MsCwebb You're saying emperors looked exactly like northern barbarians. That makes no sense, culture vulture.
1
@MsCwebb Refusing to fight my army means you're an impotent enemy, clearly. Popularity is irrelevant, or else you have no worth compared to Justin Beaver. You belittled yourself. :-)
1
@bosertheropode5443 Dumbocracy murdered Socrates. Dumbocracy is inherently a bandwagon fallacy, so it is irrational and always inferior to monarchy if the monarch is at least decent. You go with democracy because you follow the crowd. Tell me the nation with the best democracy in history, so I can dismantle the notion of it being a good nation.
1
@bosertheropode5443 Macro-evolution is racist shit I prove is impossible in my series refuging atheist myths. Evolution is real but not macro-evolution just as puberty is real but not macro-puberty where we grow up into giants.
1
@robertc574 "Ethiopian" is an ancient term meaning "burnt skin" so clearly those ancients saw black people as a distinct type of human characterized by skin colour being dark (even black). In the Bible the Jews say Ethiopians have dark skin, so they define the Ethiopian (Amharic) race according to skin, just like in modern terms. Your liberalist propaganda trying to deny races exist as if that will make racism go away, makes no sense.
1
@jimtroy4380 "Race=\ Phenotype." That's a strawman fallacy. I never said it was just one physical trait. You have to look at the big picture.
1
@jesseberg3271 I got kicked out of a racist website once because I put the racists in their place explaining how Goths changed the demographics of Italy and Iberia such that brown hair and green or blue eyes are proof the person isn't a native to the region. They hated that I called myself Iberian of the original stock. They wish they were natives, and a real native existing is a threat to their narrative of being natives.
1
@1salvaje " Imagine disregarding all of the information confirming our ancient ancestors held similar idealogical perspectives regarding our modern construct of race…. Oh wait, there aren’t any documents that support that argument." The Bible saying Ethiopians are dark matches what modern people say about their race. That's just one example.
1
@mystictomato9466 "I'm not saying they looked like North Europeans, I'm saying that they looked not much different from modern day Italians" Modern day Italians are largely Germanic Goths or Lombards or mixed, not the original Italians.
1
@jesseberg3271 Race is an extended family. You're saying extended families don't really exist just because the parameters for them are subjective.
1
@1salvaje [[[ Christianity was instrumental in the adoption of this idea of inferiority based on “race” ]]] Christianity says all races come from Adam and Eve, and to love everyone, so you're lying. You are also probably a massive hypocrite since you are almost certainly a macro-evolutionist. My series refuting atheist myths proves that macro-evolution is inherently racist, and that Darwin wanted all non-Europeans to be murdered. That is who you follow. :-)
1
@1salvaje Ancients talked about black people such as Ethiopians being a race just like modern people do, so your notion that race is a new thing is a lie, liberal extremist.
1
@1salvaje "There were negative references to Aethiops, but there were just as many negative references to the Gauls, Germanics, Greeks, Kushites, Numidians, Iberians, etc. all documented. Broad 'racial' identifiers, not documented." If they weren't documented, how come you say the references existed? Make up your mind.
1
@MsCwebb You call people nerds and dorks because they're not racists like you who fell for IQ fiction that my series proving atheist myths wrong proves is racist and unscientific. Your running away from my arguments is impotence and cowardice. Checkmate. Too easy.
1
@MsCwebb Give me the exact quotes. Hearsay isn't good enough.
1
@MsCwebb You're so irrational you are saying that Romans saw northern savages as very different while at the same time looking exactly like them. LOL!!!! You contradict yourself. That's how irrational your paradigm is, racist culture vulture.
1
@MsCwebb Do you say AVGVSTVS had blond hair?
1
@MsCwebb It's your job to substantiate your crazy assertions, not mine to go on a wild goose chase for your shit.
1
@MsCwebb You call me a liberal when I made a video saying slavery isn't wrong? You are a liberal compared to me since you believe in IQ like liberals also do because they are liberated from the constraints of reason. :-)
1
@MsCwebb I hate Hellywood. The Hellywood-infected liberal mind is yours since you fell for the liberal lie that IQ is legitimate.
1
@MsCwebb You're afraid to say what your race is. Heh. What a miserable racist, pretending to be superior yet not confident enough in his own race to declare it. :-)
1
@jesseberg3271 Ethnicity isn't a genetic family. Ethnicity is about culture and can cover race like an umbrella term. "based on how people look" is based on genetic proximity which is why I look like my dad and you look like your mom, more than like the average stranger.
1
@jesseberg3271 Scottish is an ethnicity because it means someone from an artificial nation called Scotland, which isn't limited to any particular race such as Picts who are Celts and natives to what is now Scotland. A guy in Boston claiming to be a Celt from Ireland is right when he talks about race since that isn't determined by where you are born, but where your type of flesh comes from, just as a Chinese guy born in San Francisco is Chinese no matter what language he speaks and what beliefs he has. That isn't a matter of opinion.
1
@jesseberg3271 Am I European? Yes I'm Iberian of the original stock. I know this by process of elimination considering the possibilities and what I can tell from just looking at my features, what I am not. I'm clearly not Germanic, so I can't be a Goth or Vandal. I'm not like Cheb Khaled nor the Saudi king, so I'm not Berber nor Arab. My features don't match those of Italian natives who have big eyes like Silvester Stallone, as a typical feature, so I don't descent from Italian settlers during Roman centuries. I'm not Greek either. I have no Celtic features. I am therefore a Native to Iberia, and potentially have some Phoenician blood since I have compared myself to modern Lebanese who are natives there, and there are a lot of similarities, but not enough to make me that to any high degree. I was born in Honduras, and an ignorant gringo (US guy) said I can't be Spanish because I was born there. The idiot knows nothing, and says the equivalent of "You can't be white if you're born in South Africa!" :-)
1
@jesseberg3271 " In the Americas," There is only 1 América, and the US of AIDS isn'´t even half of it. Glad I left that shithole. "race is what you look like, White, Black, Latino, etc." Latino is an ethnicity because it is about culture, not race. I met a racially Chinese guy from Cuba in Miami. He's Hispanic AKA Latino, yet that doesn't say anything about his race.
1
@jesseberg3271 Well, obviously ancient Egyptians were brown, and there was just that relatively short-lived Ptolemaic dynasty of rulers that was white, but as for "that Romans were white, the ancient Greeks were white," of course they were white. White means European. Greeks were and are Europeans. Romans were too. It seems you use the term "white" to mean Germanic or Celtic, in which case, you misuse the label, but are correct to say that Romans were not like Germanics, which is why they remarked at how different they were (for being light-coloured in the eyes and hair, and taller in general). The fact Roman originals remakred at how exotic they were proves that the Roman Emperors didn't look like them (blond, blue-eyed, or green-eyed or ginger or brown-haired).
1
@jesseberg3271 Race is an extended family the parameters for which are subjectively determined such as "Negroid" or can be more narrow for a subrace such as "Bantu." Black people are objectively their own family since they branch out of the stem of mankind, and so do Mongoloids and so do Caucasoids.
1
@jesseberg3271 My series refuting atheist myths proves that Darwin wanted all non-Europeans to die. Britain went from that extreme to the other side of the pendulum, to claiming race doesn't matter anymore, which is equivalent to saying that inheritance doesn't matter anymore. Races carry on glory and lands in certain cases, such as Chinese people being able to call China their native land.
1
@jesseberg3271 I was always aware that some people are wrong and misuse terms.
1
@mystictomato9466 I'm 33 and I have a white hair on my beard, so your argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't cut it.
1
@mystictomato9466 Your argument is: "Ancient original Romans said barbarians of the north had light features, which the Romans considered VERY DIFFERENT, but the same Romans looked exactly like them!" That's a self-contradiction. Either keep your notion of Romans looking like barbarians racially, and throw away the historical fact they said barbarians looked different, or keep that fact and throw away your notion that Romans looked like barbarians. You contradict yourself. There is no way around it. Trying to stretch words to mean things isn't good enough of an argument, because it will never deal with this contradiction. Shaquille O'Neil must be Irish if you have a point. :-) LOL!
1
@mystictomato9466 "Italians today don't look the same as many of the Germanic peoples throughout Europe." Because Germanics aren't monolithic. Goths don't look the same as Alemanni descendants, for example. White Europeans? That's redundant. All Europeans are white. Germanics aren't the only white ones, nor Celts along with them. That's pretending that only those groups are Europeans, which is absurd. Iberia had no Germanics for most of its earliest centuries. My people were there first. My people are natives to western Europe, not Germanics. Celts to the central west of Europe, and Iberians to the south. Portraits? Like of Alexander the Great depicted as tanned brown? That matches southern European natives, who are not white by your racist standard.
1
@mystictomato9466 Thanks but it's best to not call it evolution because that mixes the real evolution with the lie, the truth with the myth. Satan sells his lie by mixing it with the truth, and calling macro-evolution merely evolution is lumping it together with something that is real, making it look right by association.
1
@MsCwebb So you're acting like a troll now with deliberately irrelevant remarks to try to salvage your ego as if to say you were just joking all along. Very convincing after seeing you struggle to win for so long.
1
@Slayer119988 The youtuber The Metatron is a very very very white Italian who seems to me to be a true Italian as in a native descendant with black hair and big eyes just like the ancient Romans. Is he not really Italian native-wise to you, since you say an Italian always indoors will not be as white as a German?
1
@MsCwebb "Can't compare blacks with other races." Of course you can. You just did by saying they are a different race than others. :-V
1
@1salvaje "The Bible also says we all descend from Adam and Eve, which doesn’t really lend credence to the construct of “race?” " The Bible says Ethiopians are men, and that they are a unique race, so the Bible's authors always knew that from Adam and Eve came all varieties of man. The Bible doesn't have to spell everything out for you, as if it had to say "AND BY THE WAY, people are designed to adapt within certain parameters because God is wise."
1
@1salvaje "Unfortunately, it has been used by Christianity to support all manner of atrocity, modern and ancient." Jesus defines who follows him, not me nor you, and he said that those who obey him are his people, not those who CLAIM to obey him but don't. You say actions don't speak louder than words, so you err. Jesus said most people go to hell (wide is the path to destruction) so based on the Bible, no nation can be Christian. You confuse heretics with real Christians. You fell for Satan's counterfeits because you judge superficially.
1
@mystictomato9466 Slavs are cool. Peace.
1
@Slayer119988 I think Metatron is from Palermo in Sicily. That's very southern yet he's among the whitest people I've ever seen on the internet. I don't recall an olive glow to his skin. What video and time mark? In Miami I knew a German pastor of a Moravian church who would go to the beach with the black people of the church, and act like them in the sense that he didn't protect himself from the sun. He got skin cancer on his bald head.
1
@1salvaje "Yes the Church was working to reverse the superior- inferior ideas fostered in previous years, but the damage was done and Darwin only further developed the ideas they inadvertently created." The church of counterfeits who worship Mary isn't the real group of Christians in the world. Jesus said most people go to hell (wide is the path to destruction) so based on Jesus' teaching, no nation can be Christian as that would require most people in an entire country to be on the narrow path instead. Jesus said many will call him Lord, but he will tell them to get lost. Satan misrepresented the Way to try to discredit Jesus' name, and it works on people who judge superficially.
1
@1salvaje "Yes the Church was working to reverse the superior- inferior ideas fostered in previous years, but the damage was done and Darwin only further developed the ideas they inadvertently created." The Bible doesn't say any race is inherently superior to others in intellect. It only says Jews are the chosen race but that they don't deserve to be. So it's not racist in the negative sense at all. It says in Jesus there is neither Jew nor Greek.
1
@1salvaje [[[ But is that the interpretation you acquired after reading Darwin’s “Descent of Man”, or is that your understanding of Darwin’s “Descent of Man” from another individual’s perspective? Either way I would have to read it myself, which to be honest, doesn’t interest me. ]]] My series proves he wanted every non-European in the entire world to be killed, and I used his own words. You say you're not interested because you have no way to defend what I proved is extreme evil and worse than any Nazi belief. Brits were worse than Nazis but naturally British people don't teach that, nor their offshoots and mentally-still-colonized such as the US people and Indians respectively.
1
@1salvaje "He may not have had such radical ideas if sequenced genome data was available to him." DNA tells you what your eyes can see. DNA determines what your eyes see, after all, if you know what I mean.
1
@1salvaje "Ohhh I see. You are refusing to apply your reasoning concerning Darwin and his statements to what I assume is your religious beliefs, and the historic atrocities enacted by Christian leaders with Bible in tow, in the name of god." No. Actually, you refuse to see, because I already explained how your gullible definition of Christian takes out of context and totally ignores Jesus' definition of Christian which his whoever obeys him, which Roman Catholics and Protestants and Russian "Orthodox" and Ethiopians clearly don't since they're idolaters who do graven images the Bible forbids. Your argument is that words speak louder than actions, because it suits your anti-Christ agenda. Are you an atheist? An agnostic?
1
@1salvaje " if the construct of race as defined by our modern standard, was a concept since ancient times, " Strawman fallacy. I never said that. I said race is just an extended family, which indeed exist despite parameters being subjectively defined.
1
@1salvaje If you're an atheist, and judging by your anti-Bible prejudice and unwillingness to declare what you are out of fear of having to defend the indefensible, you are an atheist (which agnostics are), so I just want to say I destroyed the main atheist paradigm in my series "The Politically-Incorrect History of atheism + Refutation of atheist Myths" where I prove that macro-evolution is literally impossible, and that Darwin whom you apparently follow despite wanting to distance yourself from his racist idiot self, wanted all non-Europeans to be murdered. Your username is Spanish for "savage" so you might prefer my Spanish version of that series. Most don't care to look at the series because they assume I don't deliver, because they judge superficially, but if cowards don't face my army, that hurts them, not me.
1
@1salvaje "an interpretation of more than 2000 year old Hebrew text," The Torah says Israel is adjacent to Egypt. Two thousand years later, that remains passed down just as originally. Your notion that being ancient means it had to be totally altered is a false notion since you don't take into account many things such as that any deviations would be almost always frowned upon and suppressed, or unable to suppress the originals entirely, such as if a country were to get rid of the entire Bible and replace it with frauds, that would be exposed by the originals preserved elsewhere. "subjected to modern sociolinguistics" Doesn't prove the Bible is wrong, so get to it. "and definitions says Ethiopians are men of a unique race." I didn't say it used the word race explicitly. It's implicit because it refers to a population of people as distinct physically from others, which is what a race is.
1

Previous
6
Next
...
All