General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

SCINTILLAM DEI
Invicta
comments

Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "What did the Romans think about Race? DOCUMENTARY" video.

Ancient Romans: "Light eyes, light skin and tallness are exotic attributes of northern barbarians." Most people today: "Ancient Romans were blond and looked exactly like the barbarians they found to be remarkably different!" Original Romans were black-haired and light-skinned with brown eyes, just like my original Iberian stock.
40
Rome acted in self-defense. It wiped out Celtic towns from the map of Europe because of the trauma of the event ending with WOE TO THE VANQUISHED!
10
Liberal extremist: "It's all right to use a flamethrower on a German in the last world war, but making them clean the dishes is slavery, and slavery is EEEEEEVIL!" Liberal extremist: "Slavery is evil according to my self-righteous cherry-picked atheist system of ethics subject to change conditions apply. Therefore the Bible is vile. By the way, I condone of taking prisoners of war from terrorists. Prisoners are slaves since both are men with no freedom, but I'm a liberal hypocrite."
8
Liberal extremist: "Race is a social construct. They don't exist. There is only 1 race: the human race." Me: "Then there's only 1 dog breed: the breed called dog."
7
@arrow1414 "At least they paid their taxes and gave a modicum of "respect" to the Roman God unlike the defiant followers of Christ that regularly blasphemed the Roman Gods." That's just slander, little anti-Christ. Any Christian would know Jesus' teaching on paying taxes: "And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him."
5
@alexanderchristopher6237 The best defense is a good offense. I don't know who started the war between Carthage and Rome, but as far as Celts, the Celts were bullies first. Why do you cry for the loss of the baby-sacrificing empire? I'm glad Romans liberated my ancestors from that yoke, despite replacing it with their own.
4
@arrow1414 "the Jewish religon was ancient and so held "Gravitas". Unlike that new fangled Cult that were founded by renegade Jews who worshiped a Jewish man that claimed to be the son of the Jewish God and so was King of the Jews that supposed to be superior to the real King, Emperor Augustus Ceasar. " Christianity is in Genesis when it says God sacrificed an innocent animal to deal with the shame of Adam and Eve brought by sin. Christianity is in Genesis when it says Abraham had to sacrifice his son, but God provided a Substitute. Christianity is in Genesis when it says the snake on a pole was lifted up so that all who looked upon it would be cured. Christianity is just as ancient as Judaism but not manifested until the right time. Satan counterfeited it with Mary-worshipping Roman Catholicism and its corrupt branches which have broken off in certain cases.
3
@Abshir1it1is Arguments don't need anyone's recognition to be valid. You didn't refute the argument. You just committed an argument from incredulity fallacy. It didn't pop up yesterday except to ignorant people who ignore the Old Testament pointing to Jesus all over the place.
3
I did a video proving that slavery isn't wrong, which makes liberal extremists very angry. :-)
3
@bosertheropode5443 You're using arbitrary criteria to use different standards for what are in both cases merely racial variants. The biggest difference among dog breeds is size, like a chihuahua versus a Great Dane. Compare a Bolivian with an Englishman and you'll see a big size difference, but not as drastic. My series refuting atheist myths proves IQ is racist and so is macro-evolution. Darwin wanted all non-Europeans to be murdered. They don't tell us that when they try to indoctrinate us.
3
@jesseberg3271 My southern Mediterranean race (Iberian, Latin and Greek) can tan brown because the races are native to the region unlike the guys who tan orange.
3
Original Romans: "Light eyes, light hair colours and tallness are what make northern barbarians different from us." Culture vulture Germanics: "Original Romans had light eyes, light hair colours and looked the same as their northern neighbours." History contradicts the claim the emperors weren't black-haired and brown-eyed. When an author said AVGVSTVS was light-haired, they mentioned his OLD age, so context says why he had light hair, and it wasn't because of race. I hate seeing ancient Romans depicted as physically identical to northern savages.
2
@toastedt140 I love calling them liberal extremists. It pisses them off. :-)
2
@arrow1414 It's not my opinion. It's a fact, and Isaiah prophesies the Messiah would die for the sins of the people. The Torah says God wanted to destroy the Jews because they always rebelled against him, so Jews being against Jesus is good evidence he is who he says he is. Romans fought wars against those Jews you claim were regarded highly by Romans. Christians payed taxes. Jews rebelled. You don't know history.
2
@georgyzhukov6409 " I'm talking about the orthodox that actually follow and learn torah" The racists who want Ethiopians kicked out of Israel? They don't follow the Torah because they're racists and put the Talmud above the Torah.
2
Probably due to typing to fast. Haste makes waste.
2
@bosertheropode5443 You believe in democracy, and that makes you a liberal in my book. Democracy is inherently irrational being a bandwagon fallacy. Democracy murdered Socrates. Every democracy is actually an oligarchy, since whoever controls the media and the indoctrination centers and so forth, can sway the masses. Just look at how the US was so quick to rape Iraq because of the official lie promoted by the media, about weapons of mass destruction.
2
@MsCwebb Northern Germanics get orange in the sun. You're pretending Roman originals got orange instead of brown? See how the ancient Romans of POMPEII depicted Alexander the Great, tanned BROWN, in the fresco of the Battle of ISSVS. Alexander was a special case because he was a mix of barbarian and Greek, hence his part blond part black hair (since his hair was like the mane of an Asiatic lion, part yellow, part black).
2
@mystictomato9466 People who say that IMPERATOR AVGVSTVS had light hair are IGNORING CONTEXT: old age causing the lightness of the hair! LOL! To say that Roman originals looked exactly like the northern savages they remarked at for being SO DIFFERENT, is to deny history for a racist, self-aggrandizing culture-vulture agenda.
2
@1salvaje You're right that racists like the vampire lover jump to unwarranted conclusions regarding word meanings when language is very flexible in many cases, so a word that they say means yellow may have actually just meant "bright" such as white hair from old age after the black hair of the original Roman Emperor was faded out. Even my own black hairs on my arms can look golden in the sunlight under certain conditions.
2
@MsCwebb I didn't say Vlad was a vampire. I was mocking you, but you can't detect when I joke because I have dry humour and I didn't use stupid smileys like you do.
2
This is the internet. That doesn't work.
2
One time a gringo Texan said my hat was "not a real cowboy hat." As if I like cowboys. I hate them. They perpetrated the American Holocaust.
1
@andrefromelpasotexas3236 He and I were in Cambodia. He teaches English with a Phd, and I with a Bachelor's. He likes to look down on everyone. His pride is an abomination.
1
@andrefromelpasotexas3236 Sí.
1
Because people are involved with everything, and everyone belongs to one race or another, and a race is just a very extended family, and families have inheritances, and so it matters if your family has the right to glory others don't have. Also to land.
1
Hannibal: "When in Rome, wait for back-up from the homeland that won't come thanks to selfish jerks among the politicians."
1
@arrow1414 I did a series where I crushed the racist macro-evolution myth about subhuman proto-blacks like Lucy, a reference to LVCIFER, the author of your myth, preachy atheist which I assume you are. If not, let me know. Many atheists deny being atheists while hiding in the category of agnosticism as if that weren't a subcategory of atheism. Let's see whose paradigm is truly ridiculous. :-)
1
@Abshir1it1is PS Being ancient ergo "legitimate" as you call it, is an appeal to tradition fallacy.
1
@arrow1414 "The Jews would disagree with you." Just like they disagreed with Moses and with the other prophets and with YHWH. Thanks for pointing that out. :-)
1
@arrow1414 "But they followed them eventally after being shown their power. Are you saying you are Moses or God?" So you admit that Jews rejected men of God and always fought against God. The very name Israel means "He fights Elohim." He fights God. It's in their nature to be evil. I worship a Jew, and you don't, so don't use the "anti-Semite" slander card in case you're itching to. You verge on a strawman fallacy with your question asking me if I am Moses or God? They are my spiritual family. I never said I am God, nor that I am even half as good as Moses was.
1
@arrow1414 So you unwittingly call the Torah anti-Semitic. LOL! "And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation." When you are so desperate you resort to calling the Jewish Tanakh anti-Jewish, you show you have lost the debate, since that's like saying the Koran is anti-Arab.
1
@arrow1414 Your username is arrow but you always miss. First with your slander that Christians did not pay taxes when Jesus said to give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and then with Christianity being in Genesis I had to teach you since you don't even understand Christianity nor Judaism that you, in your desperate attempt to slander me as an anti-Semite since AD HOMINEM fallacies and lies are all you can do, meant you did collateral damage on anti-Christ Jews' own Judaism since the Torah before Christianity was manifested, says Jews are always rebellious. Not my opinion.
1
@arrow1414 "I don't need to use the card since you admit it yourself by saying they always fought against God." NON SEQVITVR fallacy. If I say that Germans were murderers in Nazi days, you would if consistent accuse me of being racist against Germans even though everyone knows it's true, and you don't have to hate Germans to see that. Tell me: DID GERMANS AS A MAJORITY DO EVIL THEN?
1
@georgyzhukov6409 If they accepted the Torah, they would accept that God has legs because the Torah says God was walking in the garden. They can't even get past the first chapter of Genesis without misinterpreting God's words. God divorced Israel and chose Christians to be his new bride in order to make Israel feel jealous so Israel will want to obey again and return to the Lord. Only a remnant will. Zechariah 14 has the prophesy of how God will punish anti-Christ Jews, and it is by using the entire Gentile world to destroy Israel.
1
@georgyzhukov6409 I used to be a Zionist. Zionism is heresy because it is idolatry putting Jews above God, as if God always has to keep his end of the deal despite Jews always failing their duty to obey him. God has self-respect, so those who don't respect God will be lightly esteemed. Jesus called Jewish leaders snakes and hellbound. Jews reject Jesus because their leaders keep them from understanding the Torah. The Talmud is racist. See the video "Israel's New Racism: The Persecution of African Migrants in the Holy Land." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA&t=4s&ab_channel=TheNation
1
@arrow1414 "The vast majority of the leadership yes did Evil or was complicit in it. But your average German at the home front, no." The leaders of nations have no power if the people are overwhelmingly against them. Germans were overwhelmingly in favour of Nazism. You are refusing to admit German guilt. So you are an anti-Semite, by your own standard. :-) Saying it was just a few Germans is saying that most Nazis were innocent. "Wir was just following orders" That's complicity and therefore guilt is accrued.
1
@arrow1414 [[[ You quote me so quote me where I said Christians refused to pay taxes to the Romans please." Oh, so now you backpedal dishonestly from the implication you misleadingly chose to put in your wording. "At least they paid their taxes and gave a modicum of "respect" to the Roman God unlike the defiant followers of Christ that regularly blasphemed the Roman Gods ]]] Saying at least Jews paid taxes in comparison to Christians is saying Christians didn't.
1
@georgyzhukov6409 You say Jews accept the Torah... yet modern Israel has sin parades. You are extremely wrong.
1
@arrow1414 What do I mean by evil? Any.
1
@arrow1414 Do you admit that the Torah says the God of the Jews wanted to destroy them because they were such stubborn rebels? I had to educate you about the religion you pretend to understand. Again: "And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation." That was written centuries before the first century when Christianity was manifested. That's from Judaism itself, ancient and canon. So your calling me anti-Semitic for agreeing with the Jewish Scriptures.... is totally irrational and shows that you know nothing.
1
@arrow1414 You, Arrow1, say most Nazis were innocent, yet you call me an anti-Semite for agreeing with the Torah in the countless places where it calls Jews rebellious and sinful. That's sheer hypocrisy, atheist. Are you an atheist or what? Are you afraid to say what you are? I want to thoroughly expose your paradigm so everyone can see you are not fit to judge on morality, especially when you're already a proven slanderer with no honour.
1
@arrow1414 "I didn't say just a few Germans just not the majority of the population of 80 million" A minority is always few compared to the majority.
1
"A minority is always few compared to the majority." Well, unless it's 49 versus 51, but the Nazis clearly captured the hearts of most Germans as can be seen from the patriotic zeal of most Germans except the Meh Nazi.
1
@arrow1414 "Regardless it is hard to oppose a murderous regime" Look at you mitigating Nazi criminals saying they had it tough. They were all evil for complicity, the majority. You're acting like an anti-Semite despite accusing me of that. Such irony.
1
@arrow1414 Most Chinese people may disagree on one thing or another with the atheist communists in charge, but overwhelmingly, they are loyal or else the country would be in a civil war now but that is happening only in Hong Kong it seems, last I checked. In Iran most are Muslims and Shia, so that's why they don't revolt except a few.
1
@arrow1414 "What do you mean a 'sin parade'? Living in the modern world?" AD NOVITATEM fallacy. You are poisoned with liberalism. The Synagogue of Satan spread it with their dog, Napoleon.
1
@arrow1414 You equate the Jewish race with homosexuality. ... LOL! YOu would be silly enough to call Jesus anti-Semitic because Jesus hated degeneracy (EDIT: He still does). You would call Pharisees anti-Semitic for being against that too. You would say Israel was anti-Semitic for most of its history! Do you not see how irrational you are?
1
@arrow1414 You keep saying you won't argue about religious things, while continuing to do so. If you can't stand the heat, don't start the fire.
1
@arrow1414 At least you say you worded it badly. Thanks for that honesty.
1
@arrow1414 You don't even know what a phobia is. It's an irrational fear, and being disgusted by lying about the purpose of your body or going against it shamelessly, is not a phobia, slanderer and truthphobe.
1
@arrow1414 I thought you were able to grasp the meaning of sin parade knowing that homosexuals are the ones who parade. You don't see abortionist parades, only marches. You don't see lying parades per se.
1
@arrow1414 "You think it is easy to start a revolution against a murderous regime? " Refusing to be an accomplice isn't exactly a revolution, and you're still mitigating Nazis while hypocritically accusing me of anti-Semitism just because I agree with Jews who wrote the Bible and criticized Jews as stubborn.
1
@arrow1414 " if most people aren't involved then not all the people are guilty." Your premise is a lie since most Germans of the time worked with or were outright Nazis, always being guilty by complicity at least. You anti-Semite! Haha!
1
@arrow1414 "Christians refused to respect the Roman gods above their own as to the reason of their persecution (as well asbvicious Roman rumors about Christians being Incestuous and cannabalistic)." So you bash Christians because they have conviction and won't worship a mere mortal because they know God hates idolatry. The cannibalism slander is based on refusing to recognize the symbolic language of when Jesus said one must drink his blood and eat his flesh in order to have eternal life. He meant, obviously, that one would have to spiritually become Jesus in order to have eternal life, in the sense of trade, since Jesus took our guilt, and we would take his innocence. That's how he can save you, and that's how he saves me and will. The incest accusation may be based on Christians not marrying outside of their own group since God forbids light mixing with darkness in an unequal yoke.
1
@arrow1414 "You saying that in places like Nazi Germany and Communist North Korea the people don't seem to resist that means they approve of their government shows you are insensitive to the position of the average person." Look at this anti-Semite feeling bad for Nazis. :-) "Would you like to be the first to be labled a Resister and picked up by the secret police and put into a camp and perhaps executed?" I fought a robber before to save a stranger old lady before, and I can tell you how to acquire the footage I'm hoping to get. That resisting evil is difficult does not justify complicity with evil. Stop commiserating with Nazis, anti-Semite who accused me of being like you. :-)
1
@arrow1414 They're gay in the non-happy way. :-)
1
@arrow1414 You are so poisoned with liberalism, you are almost certainly an atheist, since it is usually only atheist fanatics who say murdering the unborn is all right, and lying about the sexual purpose of your body, and bash Christians for resisting corruption the world wants them to share in. So are you an atheist?
1
@arrow1414 "And the historical record is that Christians refused to respect the Roman gods" That's like you refusing to bow to Mecca if Muslims demanded you to idolize that cube, except you probably would just lie and pretend to be a Muslim, right? You would sacrifice truth to preserve your dying flesh? That's why you hate Christians. They put truth above themselves.
1
@georgyzhukov6409 Of course the hypocrites don't say it overrules Torah, but since they determine what Troah means by what Talmud says Torah means, that means they put the Talmud first. That's putting man-made traditions above God's word, which the Holy Scriptures warn against.
1
Pissney is gay in the non-happy way. I won't let my daughter watch that shit. She should watch INVICTA instead.
1
For Obese Americans of the US of AIDS?
1
Aliens are an atheist myth I prove extremely irrational in my series on atheist myths.
1
@MsCwebb "🤣👌" So the blue leeches tickle you as you try to pry them off. Your immediate resort to ridicule without refuting my arguments in my series crushing your racist atheistic paradigm shows your are irrational, and unfit to judge on intelligence.
1
@MsCwebb What's your race?
1
@bosertheropode5443 "What? Darwin wanted all non europeans to be killed? Never heard that before, seems unlikely to me to be honest." The proof is in my series in the section on macro-evolution. I prove it using his own words. You can say unlikely, but I don't gamble and chance is irrelevant when the "improbable" has already been proven. And there's nothing improbable about that. Brits wiped out all Tasmanians calling them "missing links." Darwin was another brother to those murderers.
1
@jimtroy4380 Yes, Iranians are Aryans if they are the white ones as opposed to the Persians of the south. Race is real just as dog breed is real. Is chihuahua a mere social label? No. Same with races.
1
@MsCwebb You're saying emperors looked exactly like northern barbarians. That makes no sense, culture vulture.
1
@MsCwebb Refusing to fight my army means you're an impotent enemy, clearly. Popularity is irrelevant, or else you have no worth compared to Justin Beaver. You belittled yourself. :-)
1
@bosertheropode5443 Dumbocracy murdered Socrates. Dumbocracy is inherently a bandwagon fallacy, so it is irrational and always inferior to monarchy if the monarch is at least decent. You go with democracy because you follow the crowd. Tell me the nation with the best democracy in history, so I can dismantle the notion of it being a good nation.
1
@bosertheropode5443 Macro-evolution is racist shit I prove is impossible in my series refuging atheist myths. Evolution is real but not macro-evolution just as puberty is real but not macro-puberty where we grow up into giants.
1
@robertc574 "Ethiopian" is an ancient term meaning "burnt skin" so clearly those ancients saw black people as a distinct type of human characterized by skin colour being dark (even black). In the Bible the Jews say Ethiopians have dark skin, so they define the Ethiopian (Amharic) race according to skin, just like in modern terms. Your liberalist propaganda trying to deny races exist as if that will make racism go away, makes no sense.
1
@jimtroy4380 "Race=\ Phenotype." That's a strawman fallacy. I never said it was just one physical trait. You have to look at the big picture.
1
@jesseberg3271 I got kicked out of a racist website once because I put the racists in their place explaining how Goths changed the demographics of Italy and Iberia such that brown hair and green or blue eyes are proof the person isn't a native to the region. They hated that I called myself Iberian of the original stock. They wish they were natives, and a real native existing is a threat to their narrative of being natives.
1
@1salvaje " Imagine disregarding all of the information confirming our ancient ancestors held similar idealogical perspectives regarding our modern construct of race…. Oh wait, there aren’t any documents that support that argument." The Bible saying Ethiopians are dark matches what modern people say about their race. That's just one example.
1
@mystictomato9466 "I'm not saying they looked like North Europeans, I'm saying that they looked not much different from modern day Italians" Modern day Italians are largely Germanic Goths or Lombards or mixed, not the original Italians.
1
@jesseberg3271 Race is an extended family. You're saying extended families don't really exist just because the parameters for them are subjective.
1
@1salvaje [[[ Christianity was instrumental in the adoption of this idea of inferiority based on “race” ]]] Christianity says all races come from Adam and Eve, and to love everyone, so you're lying. You are also probably a massive hypocrite since you are almost certainly a macro-evolutionist. My series refuting atheist myths proves that macro-evolution is inherently racist, and that Darwin wanted all non-Europeans to be murdered. That is who you follow. :-)
1
@1salvaje Ancients talked about black people such as Ethiopians being a race just like modern people do, so your notion that race is a new thing is a lie, liberal extremist.
1
@1salvaje "There were negative references to Aethiops, but there were just as many negative references to the Gauls, Germanics, Greeks, Kushites, Numidians, Iberians, etc. all documented. Broad 'racial' identifiers, not documented." If they weren't documented, how come you say the references existed? Make up your mind.
1
@MsCwebb You call people nerds and dorks because they're not racists like you who fell for IQ fiction that my series proving atheist myths wrong proves is racist and unscientific. Your running away from my arguments is impotence and cowardice. Checkmate. Too easy.
1
@MsCwebb Give me the exact quotes. Hearsay isn't good enough.
1
@MsCwebb You're so irrational you are saying that Romans saw northern savages as very different while at the same time looking exactly like them. LOL!!!! You contradict yourself. That's how irrational your paradigm is, racist culture vulture.
1
@MsCwebb Do you say AVGVSTVS had blond hair?
1
@MsCwebb It's your job to substantiate your crazy assertions, not mine to go on a wild goose chase for your shit.
1
@MsCwebb You call me a liberal when I made a video saying slavery isn't wrong? You are a liberal compared to me since you believe in IQ like liberals also do because they are liberated from the constraints of reason. :-)
1
@MsCwebb I hate Hellywood. The Hellywood-infected liberal mind is yours since you fell for the liberal lie that IQ is legitimate.
1
@MsCwebb You're afraid to say what your race is. Heh. What a miserable racist, pretending to be superior yet not confident enough in his own race to declare it. :-)
1
@jesseberg3271 Ethnicity isn't a genetic family. Ethnicity is about culture and can cover race like an umbrella term. "based on how people look" is based on genetic proximity which is why I look like my dad and you look like your mom, more than like the average stranger.
1
@jesseberg3271 Scottish is an ethnicity because it means someone from an artificial nation called Scotland, which isn't limited to any particular race such as Picts who are Celts and natives to what is now Scotland. A guy in Boston claiming to be a Celt from Ireland is right when he talks about race since that isn't determined by where you are born, but where your type of flesh comes from, just as a Chinese guy born in San Francisco is Chinese no matter what language he speaks and what beliefs he has. That isn't a matter of opinion.
1
@jesseberg3271 Am I European? Yes I'm Iberian of the original stock. I know this by process of elimination considering the possibilities and what I can tell from just looking at my features, what I am not. I'm clearly not Germanic, so I can't be a Goth or Vandal. I'm not like Cheb Khaled nor the Saudi king, so I'm not Berber nor Arab. My features don't match those of Italian natives who have big eyes like Silvester Stallone, as a typical feature, so I don't descent from Italian settlers during Roman centuries. I'm not Greek either. I have no Celtic features. I am therefore a Native to Iberia, and potentially have some Phoenician blood since I have compared myself to modern Lebanese who are natives there, and there are a lot of similarities, but not enough to make me that to any high degree. I was born in Honduras, and an ignorant gringo (US guy) said I can't be Spanish because I was born there. The idiot knows nothing, and says the equivalent of "You can't be white if you're born in South Africa!" :-)
1
@jesseberg3271 " In the Americas," There is only 1 América, and the US of AIDS isn'´t even half of it. Glad I left that shithole. "race is what you look like, White, Black, Latino, etc." Latino is an ethnicity because it is about culture, not race. I met a racially Chinese guy from Cuba in Miami. He's Hispanic AKA Latino, yet that doesn't say anything about his race.
1
@jesseberg3271 Well, obviously ancient Egyptians were brown, and there was just that relatively short-lived Ptolemaic dynasty of rulers that was white, but as for "that Romans were white, the ancient Greeks were white," of course they were white. White means European. Greeks were and are Europeans. Romans were too. It seems you use the term "white" to mean Germanic or Celtic, in which case, you misuse the label, but are correct to say that Romans were not like Germanics, which is why they remarked at how different they were (for being light-coloured in the eyes and hair, and taller in general). The fact Roman originals remakred at how exotic they were proves that the Roman Emperors didn't look like them (blond, blue-eyed, or green-eyed or ginger or brown-haired).
1
@jesseberg3271 Race is an extended family the parameters for which are subjectively determined such as "Negroid" or can be more narrow for a subrace such as "Bantu." Black people are objectively their own family since they branch out of the stem of mankind, and so do Mongoloids and so do Caucasoids.
1
@jesseberg3271 My series refuting atheist myths proves that Darwin wanted all non-Europeans to die. Britain went from that extreme to the other side of the pendulum, to claiming race doesn't matter anymore, which is equivalent to saying that inheritance doesn't matter anymore. Races carry on glory and lands in certain cases, such as Chinese people being able to call China their native land.
1
@jesseberg3271 I was always aware that some people are wrong and misuse terms.
1
@mystictomato9466 I'm 33 and I have a white hair on my beard, so your argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't cut it.
1
@mystictomato9466 Your argument is: "Ancient original Romans said barbarians of the north had light features, which the Romans considered VERY DIFFERENT, but the same Romans looked exactly like them!" That's a self-contradiction. Either keep your notion of Romans looking like barbarians racially, and throw away the historical fact they said barbarians looked different, or keep that fact and throw away your notion that Romans looked like barbarians. You contradict yourself. There is no way around it. Trying to stretch words to mean things isn't good enough of an argument, because it will never deal with this contradiction. Shaquille O'Neil must be Irish if you have a point. :-) LOL!
1
@mystictomato9466 "Italians today don't look the same as many of the Germanic peoples throughout Europe." Because Germanics aren't monolithic. Goths don't look the same as Alemanni descendants, for example. White Europeans? That's redundant. All Europeans are white. Germanics aren't the only white ones, nor Celts along with them. That's pretending that only those groups are Europeans, which is absurd. Iberia had no Germanics for most of its earliest centuries. My people were there first. My people are natives to western Europe, not Germanics. Celts to the central west of Europe, and Iberians to the south. Portraits? Like of Alexander the Great depicted as tanned brown? That matches southern European natives, who are not white by your racist standard.
1
@mystictomato9466 Thanks but it's best to not call it evolution because that mixes the real evolution with the lie, the truth with the myth. Satan sells his lie by mixing it with the truth, and calling macro-evolution merely evolution is lumping it together with something that is real, making it look right by association.
1
@MsCwebb So you're acting like a troll now with deliberately irrelevant remarks to try to salvage your ego as if to say you were just joking all along. Very convincing after seeing you struggle to win for so long.
1
@Slayer119988 The youtuber The Metatron is a very very very white Italian who seems to me to be a true Italian as in a native descendant with black hair and big eyes just like the ancient Romans. Is he not really Italian native-wise to you, since you say an Italian always indoors will not be as white as a German?
1
@MsCwebb "Can't compare blacks with other races." Of course you can. You just did by saying they are a different race than others. :-V
1
@1salvaje "The Bible also says we all descend from Adam and Eve, which doesn’t really lend credence to the construct of “race?” " The Bible says Ethiopians are men, and that they are a unique race, so the Bible's authors always knew that from Adam and Eve came all varieties of man. The Bible doesn't have to spell everything out for you, as if it had to say "AND BY THE WAY, people are designed to adapt within certain parameters because God is wise."
1
@1salvaje "Unfortunately, it has been used by Christianity to support all manner of atrocity, modern and ancient." Jesus defines who follows him, not me nor you, and he said that those who obey him are his people, not those who CLAIM to obey him but don't. You say actions don't speak louder than words, so you err. Jesus said most people go to hell (wide is the path to destruction) so based on the Bible, no nation can be Christian. You confuse heretics with real Christians. You fell for Satan's counterfeits because you judge superficially.
1
@mystictomato9466 Slavs are cool. Peace.
1
@Slayer119988 I think Metatron is from Palermo in Sicily. That's very southern yet he's among the whitest people I've ever seen on the internet. I don't recall an olive glow to his skin. What video and time mark? In Miami I knew a German pastor of a Moravian church who would go to the beach with the black people of the church, and act like them in the sense that he didn't protect himself from the sun. He got skin cancer on his bald head.
1
@1salvaje "Yes the Church was working to reverse the superior- inferior ideas fostered in previous years, but the damage was done and Darwin only further developed the ideas they inadvertently created." The church of counterfeits who worship Mary isn't the real group of Christians in the world. Jesus said most people go to hell (wide is the path to destruction) so based on Jesus' teaching, no nation can be Christian as that would require most people in an entire country to be on the narrow path instead. Jesus said many will call him Lord, but he will tell them to get lost. Satan misrepresented the Way to try to discredit Jesus' name, and it works on people who judge superficially.
1
@1salvaje "Yes the Church was working to reverse the superior- inferior ideas fostered in previous years, but the damage was done and Darwin only further developed the ideas they inadvertently created." The Bible doesn't say any race is inherently superior to others in intellect. It only says Jews are the chosen race but that they don't deserve to be. So it's not racist in the negative sense at all. It says in Jesus there is neither Jew nor Greek.
1
@1salvaje [[[ But is that the interpretation you acquired after reading Darwin’s “Descent of Man”, or is that your understanding of Darwin’s “Descent of Man” from another individual’s perspective? Either way I would have to read it myself, which to be honest, doesn’t interest me. ]]] My series proves he wanted every non-European in the entire world to be killed, and I used his own words. You say you're not interested because you have no way to defend what I proved is extreme evil and worse than any Nazi belief. Brits were worse than Nazis but naturally British people don't teach that, nor their offshoots and mentally-still-colonized such as the US people and Indians respectively.
1
@1salvaje "He may not have had such radical ideas if sequenced genome data was available to him." DNA tells you what your eyes can see. DNA determines what your eyes see, after all, if you know what I mean.
1
@1salvaje "Ohhh I see. You are refusing to apply your reasoning concerning Darwin and his statements to what I assume is your religious beliefs, and the historic atrocities enacted by Christian leaders with Bible in tow, in the name of god." No. Actually, you refuse to see, because I already explained how your gullible definition of Christian takes out of context and totally ignores Jesus' definition of Christian which his whoever obeys him, which Roman Catholics and Protestants and Russian "Orthodox" and Ethiopians clearly don't since they're idolaters who do graven images the Bible forbids. Your argument is that words speak louder than actions, because it suits your anti-Christ agenda. Are you an atheist? An agnostic?
1
@1salvaje " if the construct of race as defined by our modern standard, was a concept since ancient times, " Strawman fallacy. I never said that. I said race is just an extended family, which indeed exist despite parameters being subjectively defined.
1
@1salvaje If you're an atheist, and judging by your anti-Bible prejudice and unwillingness to declare what you are out of fear of having to defend the indefensible, you are an atheist (which agnostics are), so I just want to say I destroyed the main atheist paradigm in my series "The Politically-Incorrect History of atheism + Refutation of atheist Myths" where I prove that macro-evolution is literally impossible, and that Darwin whom you apparently follow despite wanting to distance yourself from his racist idiot self, wanted all non-Europeans to be murdered. Your username is Spanish for "savage" so you might prefer my Spanish version of that series. Most don't care to look at the series because they assume I don't deliver, because they judge superficially, but if cowards don't face my army, that hurts them, not me.
1
@1salvaje "an interpretation of more than 2000 year old Hebrew text," The Torah says Israel is adjacent to Egypt. Two thousand years later, that remains passed down just as originally. Your notion that being ancient means it had to be totally altered is a false notion since you don't take into account many things such as that any deviations would be almost always frowned upon and suppressed, or unable to suppress the originals entirely, such as if a country were to get rid of the entire Bible and replace it with frauds, that would be exposed by the originals preserved elsewhere. "subjected to modern sociolinguistics" Doesn't prove the Bible is wrong, so get to it. "and definitions says Ethiopians are men of a unique race." I didn't say it used the word race explicitly. It's implicit because it refers to a population of people as distinct physically from others, which is what a race is.
1
@1salvaje So you believe in macro-evolution?
1
@1salvaje "In no way did I imply actions speak louder than words." You're lying since you gullibly take the words of Catholics and such at face value that they are Christian, so you can smear the name of my religion and condescend in willful ignorance as with this proud and empty talk: "Ohhh I see" like you accomplished anything, you paper tiger.
1
@1salvaje " Highlighting scripture that conflicts with these actions does not absolve the organization of the historical acts committed by its leaders, under its banner, as one has nothing to do with the other." I never denied Roman Catholic guilt. I made it clear they're frauds, counterfeits and heretics of Satan's false flag operation you gullibly fell for because of your anti-Christ prejudice. And "under its banner" is more of the irrational "they claim to be Christians, so it's Christianity's fault" NON SEQVITVR fallacy. You atheists always pretend to be rational yet in every post reveal the opposite is true.
1
@1salvaje "However, I would like to point out that you keep alluding to Darwin as a proponent for genocide, as a way to disprove, invalidate, or to denigrate his theory of evolution." I never said his genocidal maniac ways proved "his" non-theory was false. I proved in my aforementioned series refuting your paradigm, that macro-evolution is unscientific, inherently racist and definitely wrong.
1
@1salvaje "The construct of race is a direct result Christianity’s desire to protect European Christians," Again you gullibly take Catholics at their word that they follow Jesus. They worship Mary despite dishonestly denying it just because they label their worship veneration when all worship IS veneration, just extreme, which describes their behaviour towards the woman Jesus ignored when she wanted to speak with him as he was teaching, and then he said anyone who does God's will is his mother and brother. "The Romans enslaved anyone and everyone, a practice that continued long after the fall of the empire. That practice ceased after Christianity spread and the church deemed pagans and muslims as acceptable to be enslaved." Slavery isn't wrong, liberal extremist who almost certainly hypocritically condones of slavery when it suits him. Tell me if you're against a nation like the US taking prisoners of war at all. Prisoners are slaves, but I'm sure you'll want to add superfluous criteria to the definition.
1
@1salvaje What's your race?
1
@1salvaje "Christian nations" No such thing according to Jesus' standard that most people go to hell. You keep saying who is on Jesus' friend list while ignoring his actual friend list. You're being absurd. Here is who is on Jesus' friends' list: "Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you." I think you already know Jesus never condoned of the Inquisition nor burning of witches in Europe and Salem in NE America. I think you can see that the people claiming to be Christians were just frauds, but you are dishonest so you take them at their word because it suits your evil agenda. "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
1
@1salvaje Once again let me elaborate as to how your standard is gullible and wrong, regarding who is a Christian. You: "They claim to be so they are." Extremely gullible of you. Here's what Jesus actually said as to who is a Christian: "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." This is basic doctrine you're ignoring, showing you don't even understand the religion you hate so much! LOL!
1
@1salvaje "mainly because I was uninterested." I don't blame you. Darwin's propaganda is full of speculation and wishful thinking and very boring. His best contribution to science was his very close examination of barnacle penises! LOL!! He didn't even invent the racist macro-evolution story that his own grandfather Erasmus harped on about.
1
@1salvaje You still haven't found a single contradiction in the Bible. For such a huge book, it should be easy to find. Hurry up or stop regurgitating hearsay you gullibly accepted because rejecting the Bible that says you cannot get away with anything appeals to your EGO.
1
@1salvaje Come on, liberal extremist. Tell me if you condone of the US of AIDS taking prisoners of war from ISIS (which the US funds as I can prove). You liberal extremists bash the Bible for slavery but only because you fail to see that you also condone of slavery, but only when it suits you! Liberal hypocrisy is so... ugh... common and nasty.
1
@1salvaje You have made the false accusation that the Bible is racist in a negative sense. Does the Bible EVER say that any race is intellectually inferior to others? No, of course not. But you need to answer that question anyway, so I can punish you if you commit to that lie, or to show you are afraid to commit. :-) And do you believe in IQ?
1
@monsterhunter445 "Also we don't call it race we call it species in Biology." Races aren't species. Are you opining that races don't really exist?
1
@1salvaje Jesus flipped over tables at the Temple accusing Jews of being thieves. If I don't have a resemblance to his behaviour it's because I'm not "outrageous" enough. I must crank up the heat then. :-) Heh heh. I admit I wondered if I was being too hard on you by saying you pull imaginary rights out of your ass, but I think the context justifies my straightforward approach, since people you are trying to deceive into rejecting Jesus, need to see you for what you are exactly, which is someone whose basis for moral claims is his own ego, so it's a disgusting thing to do, bigotedly imposing your opinions like they matter. They don't. I would have watered it down if you weren't a haughty slanderer with malice. I made it clear no nation is Christian, so how would I be an eastern "Orthodox" heretic?
1
@1salvaje "You are going on about Darwin. You really haven’t proved anything other than Darwin’s theory of evolution conflicts with your religious views concerning the creation of mankind, and you reject it." You're lying because I already referred to my series "The Politically-Incorrect History of atheism + Refutations of atheist Myths" where I easily crushed your entire paradigm, atheist fanatic. :-) You just turn a blind eye to all of my arguments there, because you're just a paper tiger. Neanderthals are fiction, based on subjective ergo unscientific so-called "reconstructions" and dates that I proved are lies, in that series you are so afraid of.
1
@1salvaje "your branch of Christianity was either catholic" I already proved Catholics are heretics, but you continue to use the gullible definition of Christian as anyone who claims to be. You're just like the Polish who believed in Hitler who said he wouldn't invade Poland just as he also claimed to have been Christian. He lied, and the gullible people payed for it.
1
@1salvaje "I do believe that there is some truth to the in evolutionary biology." Equivocation.
1
@1salvaje "You might want to modify your behavior… I take it you are well aware of your future destination." Typical of an atheist fanatic to whine that they can't make a doormat out of a Christian. You love to bully, and you're using the "But your religion lets me bully you card!" It does but saying you pull rights out of your ass isn't really wrong since it helps people see your position for what it is, so they won't be deceived by the bigot who pulls imaginary rights out of his ass saying Philistines deserved to live even though their civilization was focused on child sacrifice just like the Phoenician. If I watered it down, it would not be so clear to passers-by just how narcissistic and empty your side is for acting like you can crown yourself the king of the universe and dictate what is good and what is evil, and to grant rights, as if you were better than any other mortal. The principle of the greater good is in the Bible, which justifies things normally unjustified, such as the fact that a Christian can kill a robber to save his wife from rape. But you would say the Christian doing so is going to hell because they killed someone. Yet Jesus spoke positively of the good shepherd who FIGHTS THE WOLVES to save the sheep. By making it clear what you do, which is pull imaginary rights out of your ass, I am helping passers-by understand how nasty you are for attacking Christianity, since your basis for doing so is equivalent to throwing shit! LOL! My series crushing your atheistic paradigm proves atheism justifies all evil, so it's hypocritical of you to accuse anyone of evil.
1
@1salvaje "There are people who don’t believe in god, and don’t pray, and their desires also come to fruition." Your argument from incredulity fallacy tells me you assume there is no God because you ASSUME prayer makes no difference, but that's the aforementioned fallacy. Atheists desire to get away with evil when they die. My series crushing your paradigm proves that their desire will be slain. Hahaha!
1
@1salvaje Why do you not believe in any God when you hypocritically expect me to believe you exist when I haven't seen you, and science can explain your posts' order as due to a cat walking on a keyboard? Why do you have a double standard on order coming from intention when it suits you only?
1
@1salvaje "Yes, a divine being having a chosen people is the definition of discriminatory." So is looking both ways before crossing the street, discriminating between reckless and careful, between death and life.
1
@1salvaje "I am a human being, a 100% homo sapien" I didn't ask you your species, but your variety. You are afraid to say.
1
@1salvaje "I believe race is a social construct that separates related people based on physical attributes." A race is a very big extended family. You are saying those are just opinions, when families really do exist, scientifically, despite parameters being defined by arbitrary criteria. "I am not exactly an atheist." Equivocation.
1
@1salvaje "I mean never mind that there were/ are millions of people on the planet in places the writers of those texts weren’t even aware of but, god chose them" How is it relevant if they knew about the Ainu or Tamils whether or not God chose them?
1
@1salvaje "God told them to love everyone, but they would also have to conquer, subjugate, enslave, and exterminate subjugate other nations, and peoples to further their own political interest, especially if those external groups did not submit and assimilate under the one true god." The Bible says God loves the world, but it also says he hates evil people, and the Bible says most of the world is evil, so the Bible actually teaches that God cares about everyone, but hates all who do evil. This would be a contradiction if you could never love and hate someone at the same time. Well, if you have a son whom you love because he's your flesh and blood, and you raised him, but he rebels against you, you would be caring about him (loving him) but also hating him for fighting you for some selfish reason on his part, in this scenario. You omit that the only nations Jews had to exterminate were the Philistines because they were on prime real estate that God evicted the baby-sacrificers out of to put his chosen people in. God as the Creator has the exclusive right to kill his creation, and the exclusive right to determine who shall live anywhere. You misconstrue the Bible as saying Jews had to kill people just randomly since you didn't even give a reason, choosing to HIDE the fact that Philistines were worthy of death, although not in your opinion which is based on subjectivity which doesn't really have any value any more than the claim that vanilla is the best flavour or else you should suffer.
1
@World Reject No. Ancient Egyptians depicted Nubians as darker than Egyptians. Egyptians are brown, not black.
1