Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Firstpost" channel.

  1. 65
  2. 23
  3. 15
  4. 14
  5. 14
  6. 13
  7. 12
  8. 10
  9. 9
  10. 8
  11. 6
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 5
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236.  @Tiger23117  "ur false claims" YOu didn't nor can you refute anything i said, paper tiger. "A 2000 year old religion" Red herring fallacy. Your religion being older doesn't make it right. NON SEQVITVR fallacy also. Sumerian religion is older than Indian anyway, so you defeated yourself. Well done. Slow crap for you. :-) the first person to reach your ears has to be right, according to you. That's irrational and unjust. "made by a human claiming to be a messenger of God or God himself whatever bullshit it is ." But you love bullshit. You drink cow piss, don't you, Hindu? LOL! Your argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't even scratch Christianity which remains intact no matter how much you deny the truth I already proved in my video on the prophecy that Europe would conquer the world, which proves the prophet had divine help, because mere mortals cannot know the distant future with the details given in the prophecy such as that Europe would be based on Roman civilizaiton and be divided into 10 empires using "great iron" meaning steel.... predicted before it was invented. "U people did mass genocides." Again, liar, you're confusing heretics with Chritians. My religion did no genocide, and actually... Roman Catholics did not genocide. My video "A Spanish onquistador puts accusers of genocide in their place" proves the Spanish Empire committed no genocide, despite Cahtolicism being unjustly imposed on pagans. Catholics worship Mary. They're idolaters going to hell, just like you. "We Dalits" Don't pretend to be with Dalits who suffer. You are their oppressors' accomplice. You defend the root of the problem whhich is the shitty religion called Hinduism, that blames babies for beign born poor or blind. What an obviously stupid and evil religion you cling to to fit in with your herd mentalty, cow cultist. "just a propaganda." Is your bullshit. "Like others out there u are also a converted who got trapped by missionaries with false narratives and forgot your true ancestors 🥱" I'm not a Dalit. You're not pahying attention. You're a blind drunkard punching in the darkness, so you look very silly.
    1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333.  @wisdombites3586  Oh. I now see your earlier post where you attempted to answer. It didn't show up in my notifications (I came to the actual page to check if I missed anything), but it didn't show up as a notification since only the latest comment in a thread shows up, it seems. "Bearded lady is Jesus if you have that affiliation and bearded lady is not Jesus if you don’t have that affiliation." But I didn't ask you that. The question remains: "Someone claiming Jesus was actually a bearded lady is as scripturally-based as me?" It's a simple yes or no question. Why are you having trouble with it? What are you SCARED of? :-) If what you say is true, then you should have fearlessness, except you say your truth is relative, which means you're wrong according to your own paradigm where wrong and right are both wrong and right! ... Not rational, that. TI's a contradiction of logic's Law of Identity. A equals A, period. That is absolute. "A blind person touching leg of an elephant " is you moving the goalpost. We're not talking about blind people touching Jesus. We were talking about someone making a claim that he was a bearded lady, and if that claim were as valid as the truth that he was and is actually not a lady. Maybe you are calling yourself blind. "Similarly, everyone of us have our own context" Which is why blacks, whites and Asians all disagree on Jesus' gender. Oh wait.... They don't. They know the absolute truth: Jesus was not a bearded lady. "bearded lady is Jesus for those who are brought up in that context" I didn't ask you what their insane perception is. I asked you YOUR position; if it were equally valid to the bearded lady theory. "So everything is relative again. ;)" Then your mom's a whore? It's relative. :-) PS I don't mean she's a whore. It's just for the sake of argument to make a point undeniable for you (that your mom is absolutely not a whore... unless she is? Mine is).
    1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1