Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Blast at mosque in Pakistan's Peshawar kills dozens | Vantage with Palki Sharma" video.

Shini.
2
Hindoodooism.
1
Hinduism plus Dalits = rape.
1
Islam is criminal. Islam should be banned.
1
If atheism were logical, how come you expect us to believe you when we haven't seen you?
1
Atheism is shit. I got many videos proving atheism is insanity and worse than Nazism. I'm not exaggerating. Atheists are a superstitious peole who blindly believe that Franenslime is real, and time exploded, and subhuman blacks were a thing, which is racist fiction.
1
@wisdombites3586 Real Christians don't use the cross as a symbol, which God forbids lest pepole treat it as God himself. My series exposing heretics explains. Nazis weremacro-evolutionists. They're anti-Genesis, so they're anti-Bible. Racism is against God's will to love fellow man.
1
@wisdombites3586 "truth is relative and subjective" You just justified stealing from you. Liberalism is poison. You were indoctrinated to regurgitate that lie. The truth is that people like you will have trouble with this question, as I know from experience askign it: IS IT AN ABSOLUTE TRUTH... THAT THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE TRUTHS? You act as if all interpretations were valid. So someone claiming Jesus was actually a bearded lady is as scripturally-based as me? You know that's nonsensical. You know not all interpretations are equal, so why do you act as if they were? You judge superficially. Oh, they make similar claimis, so they have similar substance or lack of substance to back it up! Nope.... Someone claiming Jesus was a bearded lady cannot have scriptural support in the least. You now it. It's objective because we can read the same words.
1
@wisdombites3586 I had asked you: "IS IT AN ABSOLUTE TRUTH... THAT THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE TRUTHS?" And: "Someone claiming Jesus was actually a bearded lady is as scripturally-based as me?" You didn't answer clearly. They're simple yes or no questions.
1
@wisdombites3586 "Everything is relative is absolute truth." This is equivocation. You didn't actually say if it is an absolute truth that absolute truths don't exist. You basically just answered a quesiton I didn't ask, moving the goalposts for your special pleading fallacy that you can make absolute statements while denying others of the same privilege. Then you talk about lying about gender as if that proves you right. LOL I plan a video using your material. Maybe 12 people will see it, but it's worth doing because what you said is funny. Is your username complaining that wisdom bites, "Wisdom bites"?
1
@wisdombites3586 The question about if Jesus being a bearded lady were as valid a view as that he was a man, is to test you to see if you are willing to be consistent with your position that all views are equally valid or invalid (except the ones you make exceptions for by your authority). So it's not out of context. It's totally relevant. You need not mention beards for me to be able to put this challenge forward. It serves as an example where, were you to be consistent in answering it, which you refuse to do, you would look rather silly, as if you would believe that he could have been a bearded lady. LOL
1
@wisdombites3586 Your question is easy to answer but I play fair, not with cheaters who want me to play fair but don't play fair themselves by answering my questions unequivocally, which I asked FIRST. One standard for me, and one for you. That's not fair. So you first. :-) Or keep running away while claiming to be wisdom incarnate.
1
@wisdombites3586 Oh. I now see your earlier post where you attempted to answer. It didn't show up in my notifications (I came to the actual page to check if I missed anything), but it didn't show up as a notification since only the latest comment in a thread shows up, it seems. "Bearded lady is Jesus if you have that affiliation and bearded lady is not Jesus if you don’t have that affiliation." But I didn't ask you that. The question remains: "Someone claiming Jesus was actually a bearded lady is as scripturally-based as me?" It's a simple yes or no question. Why are you having trouble with it? What are you SCARED of? :-) If what you say is true, then you should have fearlessness, except you say your truth is relative, which means you're wrong according to your own paradigm where wrong and right are both wrong and right! ... Not rational, that. TI's a contradiction of logic's Law of Identity. A equals A, period. That is absolute. "A blind person touching leg of an elephant " is you moving the goalpost. We're not talking about blind people touching Jesus. We were talking about someone making a claim that he was a bearded lady, and if that claim were as valid as the truth that he was and is actually not a lady. Maybe you are calling yourself blind. "Similarly, everyone of us have our own context" Which is why blacks, whites and Asians all disagree on Jesus' gender. Oh wait.... They don't. They know the absolute truth: Jesus was not a bearded lady. "bearded lady is Jesus for those who are brought up in that context" I didn't ask you what their insane perception is. I asked you YOUR position; if it were equally valid to the bearded lady theory. "So everything is relative again. ;)" Then your mom's a whore? It's relative. :-) PS I don't mean she's a whore. It's just for the sake of argument to make a point undeniable for you (that your mom is absolutely not a whore... unless she is? Mine is).
1
@wisdombites3586 "black or white hwile the reality isn't the case." Then your mom is half a whore? Either she is or she isn't? It's black or white. :-) If she's a whore one time in her life, that makes her a whore unless she repented. "your narrow frame" One plus one is two. That's narrow. You can give MANY answers, but if they don't amount to the same, they're wrong. TRUTH IS NARROW. Your paradigm says that guilty people are innocent, and innocent people are guilty. It's actually unethical. "based on your limited knowledge" You're acting as if you have unlimited knowledge to say that you know the truth but not me. You're saying I'm wrong. You're being "narrow." That's hypocrisy, liberal. You still have equivocated from both of my questions. I wait for you to answer clearly the simple yes or no questions, or I leave to make my video of our debate. One last chance.
1
@wisdombites3586 "Everything is relative is absolute truth." Oh. I missed this. My bad. I rushed. So... you say there IS an absolute truth, but only when YOU decide it its. That's CONVENIENT! LOL! ... So you are a cherry picker and a hypocrite. You fell for the trap question. Liberalism is therefore nonsensical. Relativism defeats itself. You are against something iuntless it suits you. That means you are wrong because you don't even apply your own standard across the board. What gives YOU the right but not others? That is narcissism. Liberals are narcisisists. They pretend reality revolves around them. They preach about equality yet terat THEIR view as the final word... LOL!... They harp on about the "virtue" of equality for ALL views... excpet when they fell like making a special exception FOR THEIR OWN VIEW! What a joke your ethics is when yhou are a god and everyone else must bow to your will! Arbitrary at that. But you didn't unequivocally answer y other questions. On Jesus being a lady based onn the Bible or not, and the one about your mom being a whore or not. It's a simple YES OR NO. You failed.
1
Bumblee Bee Palkistan is feminist?
1
To bypass adblock.
1