General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
No One
ReasonTV
comments
Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "'Warlords Will Take Over' and Other Lines Libertarians Are Tired of Hearing" video.
Libertarians are utopians, no different from communists and fascists, good luck with utopia my leveller friends. No cops and you'll definitely go full Congo, good luck
4
true, your solution will just mean more petty warlords, good luck with the Congo solution.
3
Bless him for being a dude.
2
Nice triggering of the Utopian Libertarian nitwits, how will they ever cope with such a reasonable statement.
2
steve Manista. The Congo solution, I hear vaginas are being used as medals in the Congo.
2
Wait, are the dumb ancap defending parliamentary democracy and the franchise, times have changed.
1
Congrats, you've played yourself.
1
The freedom to serve a corporation instead of a state, but you keep believing that men are good and women are virtue incarnate. State has an professional army, corporation has mercs, state has fiat currency, corporation has company scrip, potato, potato.
1
ArtemiaSalina. "Corporations are legal entities created by the state." I just can't be bothered. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-worlds-first-stock-exchange/9780231163781 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_East_India_Company
1
ArtemiaSalina. Read more books.
1
steve Manista. With no replacement of the state in sight, yesyesyes, very statist, but the solution free zone is annoying.
1
Ma Bell, NSA, looks pretty government to me, please try again ancap moron.
1
Constable Kranium. You're a naive moron whos never been hungry, try some hunger and you'll see the world very differently, especially when you are but one among many who are starving. Besides I'm right about Ma Bell and the NSA, nice attempt at deflection my utopian little friend.
1
Constable Kranium. Non-sequitur, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy. Please try again, I would greatly appreciate a discussion, but I must demand that my interlocutor is capable in the proper usage of the aforementioned term. https://www.merriam-webster.com/ https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus
1
Constable Kranium. Original statement. Mom: "BUT WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS??!" Me: "who built you phone mom? Was it the government?" Refutation: Ma Bell, NSA, looks pretty government to me, please try again ancap moron. Non-sequitur: idk man, from my point of view, limiting your line of thinking to only one possible solution to a relatively simple problem seems to be pretty simple minded. You really can't concieve of any possible way infrastructure could be built w/o government? I feel bad for you. Your thoughts must be pretty boring :/ Also, I don't recall claiming I'm an ancap. I'm more of a minarchist.
1
Constable Kranium. "the hunger part seems like a non-sequiter." Mom: "BUT WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS??!" http://easyscienceforkids.com/all-about-transportation/ "In the U.S., people get around mostly by cars. The U.S. has a vast system of roads and highways to take people where they need to go. Trucks deliver food and goods to stores." Fucking Minarchist Moron.
1
Constable Kranium. Moron. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_road_transport
1
Constable Kranium. Gargantuan non-sequitur, deflection reaching singularity degree mass of moronic certitude. Salve me in ex ignorantia. "The belief that "because the government has been the one doing X, they are necessarily the only means for getting X done." Simply doesn't hold. Any hypothetical society which has depended on so and so to do X, would naturally have simple minded folk who think that X could not be achieved in any other way, yet history has proven time and time again that there are many ways to skin a cat, so to speak,and humans tend to be good at figuring out those means. For example, in the days of monarchy, most would have told you that "nothing would get done if we didn't have a king!". They turned out to be wrong."
1
Constable Kranium. We are not discussing governmental systems, we are discussing whether you original and secondary statements are true, they are manifestly untrue, you are now attempting is to have another discussion, but you have to acknowledge your massive blunder vis-a-vis who created/financed the infrastructure of telecommunications and roads before such a discussion can be engaged in to our mutual benefit. You must be able to substantiate your statements if you are to attempt to provide a convincing argument for your utopian beliefs.
1
Constable Kranium. Text book knight on a hill full of straw. "that's not argument. Do you wanna actually try to make one cause You're really starting to become predictable and a bore 😪"
1
Constable Kranium. "as I've said "that's the way it's been, therefore that's the only way it could be!" Isn't an argument." Another deflection, who financed the construction of long distance interstate highways and telecommications systems in the 20th and 21th century, according to you telecommunications were constructed solely by private enterprise, this is very far from the truth, until you've acknowledged your fallacy there is no reason to take your arguments seriously and they must be considered deflections to mask ignorance.
1
Constable Kranium. moron: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moronen#Welsh
1
Constable Kranium. Be well my leveller friend.
1
Constable Kranium. Government builds roads, private enterprise builds trucks, government builds telecommunications infrastructure, private enterprise builds phones, you're still deflecting.
1
Constable Kranium. The construction of the railroads were subsidized by the US government, this happened during the westward expansion, during this expansion the railroad tycoons employed private armies of mercenaries to chase away settlers and to make sure that their labor didn't run away, they also used these mercs to fight other railroad tycoons and to fight natives, in the end it got so bad that the federal government dispatched cavalry units to maintain the peace. The US railroads are in a state of disrepair, the technology base has stagnated and the trains and the railheads are at the moment still using a 1970's tech base. Obviously some intervention has to be made in order to make them more profitable in the long term. Airports were also government subsidized and once again just like with the railroads the use of eminent domain was used to secure land for their construction, ffs man, read some history books. NASA developed the base tech for communications satellites, it was far too expensive for private enterprise to engage in such long term planning.
1
Constable Kranium. The market is unlikely to engage in long term planning due to one simple factor, the shareholders demand a quick return of investments due to the inbuilt flaw of using a fiat currency, this factor means simply put that it is not profitable to develop a scheme that generates high profit margins after a longer duration of time. That is why products such as houses, vehicles and other products are no longer manufactured to be durable, the return profit is low producing such commodities due to inflation caused by the artificially inflated demand for dollars.
1
Constable Kranium. The solution is simple and harsh, most of the retards in this video would become utterly obsolete because they are only consumers if this solution is applied, that is their only purpose in the economy, abandon the fiat dollar and they would have no currency to spend rendering them obsolete, they would have to begin from the bottom, no better off than the average Brazillian, therefore it won't happen, who's going to tell them that all they possess is practically worthless and expect these retards to agree to abolish the fiat currency. Create a currency based on a limited resource or net total production is the solution, this will of course reduce US GDP by 60%.
1
GairoDuran23. Good Luck...
1
Constable Kranium. Nobody in the public sphere will tell you this horrible fact, but it is the only solution.
1
Landon J Powell. I tried to tell the dude, but alas, his cranium is solid bone.
1
Landon J Powell. Airspace is owned by the respective nation states, some of which actually charge for use of said space. Great Britain is one such nation state.
1
Landon J Powell. Not quite, there's one individual who actually can demand that planes are vacated from her skies, Her Majesty Elizabeth II Alexandra Mary Windsor, Queen of the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms, she owns the skies. Fucking inbred arisocrats.
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. "your examples are "real-life" examples." Should Unreal Tournament examples be used instead?
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. "What if world war 1/2 never happened?" Ever hear about the gilded age prior to WW1, governments were owned and controlled by private enterprise and everything went to shit.
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. Straw Crow, incorrect use of knight on a hill, lack of a social safety net, industrialists determining foreign policy leading to the mass slaughter of WW1 causing the rise of Communism, the 1929 stock market collapse causing the rise of Nazism. Mediocre. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fbry0X7OmM
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. Reasonably priced, autodidact method recommended. https://www.dummies.com/education/history/world-history/
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. Ahh, the refugium of the defeated, gramma nazism. Basically Sophistry.
1
Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenyevwe Ugwemuhwem Osas. You ran out of arguments, goodbye little one.
1
ArtemiaSalina. Faith is for priests.
1