Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Twitter Is Censoring Your Tweets u0026 Bragging About It" video.

  1. No Buddy, this time it is, have you ever been a Conservative.
    10
  2. There's is wealth and then there is the ninth heart obtained from a Pakistani refugee wealth.
    5
  3. Correctomundo.
    4
  4. James Michael Campbell. Communism is Communism regardless of rebranding. So is Fascism rebranded.
    3
  5. info Illness. How am I wrong exactly, elaborate?
    3
  6. To say nothing of the Russian red herring.
    3
  7. And there it is, the root of tyranny, remove all sharp objects, they might cut me.
    3
  8. Fight the Lies That Be. I blame the Opium Poppy.
    3
  9. poofendorf. He is indeed the hind quarters of a female canine.
    3
  10. Hahahaha, once they were the heroes of the left, now they are the heroes of the right, funny how little your principles actually mattered when put to the question.
    2
  11. Info Illness. China, Argentina, Algeria, Russia, Brazil, Spain, Italy, Indonesia, Angola, Mozambique, Guiana, Surinam, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Libya(under Gaddafi), Egypt, Iraq(under Saddam), Syria, Honduras etc... Your turn grasshopper.
    2
  12. Info Illness. Ahhh, The Chumpsky defense, may I counter in kind with the age old Cicero attack, a tyrant is a tyrant no matter his title, an oligarchy is an oligarchy no matter by what titles the oligarchs have chosen to adorn themselves with, as for the Iberians now known as the Spanish, behold the thuggish temerity of the tenacious tangential ill temperance of the Guardia Civil replete with symbols of Roman justice upon the collar in fair Catalonia. The bountiful capital granted it's name by the greatest foe of said Fasci in ancient times appears despoiled by the truncheons of the heirs of tyranny.
    2
  13. Info Illness. And should any apply the same ridiculous defense of the Hitlerite hordes mindless Teutonic furor as you just did for the less than compassionate advocates of Homo Sovieticus, I fathom not why such leniency is granted to such a banal obfuscation employed to cast away the responsibility of the multitude of sins perpetrated by Communism, were the adherents of Fascism or Nazism to employ a similar tactic you would cry foul and let slip loose the cats faux outrage.
    2
  14. Info Illness. As for the land of beef and silver it can only be said that none of the members of the Junta was ever prosecuted and that the Kirchners and their loyal opposition remains committed to the curriculum of the Caudas who held office by force of arms, Argentina remains a flawed nation in which freedoms are few and dynasts serves the plutocracy to the detriment of the peons.
    2
  15. Correct.
    2
  16. ArchitectOfSound01. Hahahahahaha, hush now Baron von Muchhausen, Christmas is soon upon us and the ghost of Yuletide future isn't for public consumption.
    2
  17. Same reason the Saudis gave them more, it's a firesale for the Kleptocrats, step right up, hire an army of mercs with flag that once meant liberty on their shoulder.
    2
  18. Off course, the town cryer for the sheriff of Nottingham can't have Alan-a-Dale mock the sheriff and bolster the morale of the merry men, call off Christmas and execute those pesky fellows who fight alongside that dastardly Locksley Saxon rogue.
    2
  19. Krissy Workman. Frater, Those ploughshare is a drag, yet my tastes are decidedly common.
    1
  20. Step one, create socks, step two, accuse the enemy of using socks, step three, shut down free debate.
    1
  21. KC. Do not remove card. Do remove card. Do no Evil. Do Evil.
    1
  22. KC. Nah, it's a simple trick of the mind, people never see the ban, only the command, dear old google is heavily influenced by the NSA and the CIA, there is no escape from from those kindly men and women who in the name of stability directs the flow of information, I agree with with you, do not be a witless dolt, embrace your chains.
    1
  23. KC. Be well Sunshine Unit.
    1
  24. KC. Merely calling a thing a thing does not make a thing a thing, see how simple words can be used to take the wind out of your sails. Full Anglosaxon yammering ended.
    1
  25. KC. So to recap my dear contrarian, by disagreement with agreement you step right into the shit pile that you so desperately try to apply to me. fancy dandy don't make you right, tall tales being dubbed false by you in non pleb parle vous can't save your hide from a hiding. Please Insert Coin.
    1
  26. KC. That's fairly nonsensical, especially since one of the quotations belong to another commenter. 1. Yup, that's my words. Got you nailed to the carpentry with the cunning use of Heidegger. 2. Ehh, never wrote that. 3. Poetic license isn't your forte. 4. Economic use of words vs giant sprawling blathering nonsense, I prefer the economic use of words. Personal attack for no reason chucked in there, Goodly Squire, why would you stoop to such a low ploy. 5. Dude, take it easy, I'm not angry at all, don't put your incoherent rage on me. 6. Nah mate, it's an olden expression for please try again Please Insert Non Descript Token and try again.
    1
  27. KC. You misquote, bungle about and then have the brilliant idea that I'm to blame for your flawed response, neat trick. Why don't you try formulating a coherent response Sunshine. Do try to avoid misquoting me and inserting weird unfounded personal attacks that aren't really arguments.(reactionary, creationist, claims of dishonesty etc...) Calm down gather your thoughts and answer using some semblance of logic, you may even use poetry in your rebuttal, but do make it substantive. All I presented to you was the philological trickery employed by a certain corporation to encourage individuals to embrace a sort of bewildered angry narcissism, you then in turn chose to become the stereotypical example of such an individual, hence my poetic expression alluding to you embracing your proverbial chains. I repeat, calm down, employ the full force of your faculties and see that you in fact are the target of and have been succesfully subverted by a host of means employed by said corporation to Do Evil. Or you can continue to wag your tail in response like a good canine every time the bell chimes.
    1
  28. KC. To aid you in your quest for meaning I include some helpful links. The hut dweller recluse during writing par excellence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Heidegger The man from Kaliningrad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Things and the wonders of more things. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noumenon
    1
  29. KC. Misquotation with refutation. I numbered my response for the sake of economy. ""How many rounds of backpatting do you need buddy."" 2. Ehh, never wrote that.
    1
  30. KC. "Yep, begging the question. See, the very premise of your hyperbole is fallacious, yet you wear it with pride, and lie. You dare cite philosophy when you beg the question openly? You speak of avoidance......" A complete failure to understand the use of poetic license. "Yep, I did, ONCE. See how being HONEST works. Let's see if you can do it, coward, or, in your own words." Congrats, It only took you 48 hours after 2 replies to reach a point in which you issue this stellar example of a classical passive agressive response. So please don''t invoke honesty as one of your virtues, it is obviously not true. """How many rounds of backpatting do you need buddy.""" Still not my words. Misquotation. "How patting yourself on the back going? Does your little mind trick help you pretend you're not a lying coward?" You have to prove that I lied, you haven't been able to do that, you thought you did, unfortunately you did so by allocating the words of somebody else to me. Which causes me to think that the passive aggressive response is somewhat disingenious. "Nope, you just thought you did..." No arguments presented to substantiate refutation, meaningless to elaborate a response to a question unanswered. "Of an un-cited "philosophy"? How delusional of you." Which I provided, that appears to have opened the floodgates of irrationality. I'm not to blame for the fact that you appear to have gaps in your knowledge which rendered you unable to recognize the source of the paraphrase. "Says the frantic triple poster immune to paragraphs." Critique of form over function, meaningless lawyering. "To philosophical shit I learn in school. Wow, how helpful. Ah, did you think citing philosophy made you "smart". Cute, Creationists do that....... " Anti intellectualism and a personal attack, I did not cite philosophy, I paraphrased it. As for the rest, nice pasta, you do realize I can read myself and have employed that to read the pasta pasted.
    1
  31. KC. Yes I deleted that post because I believe that it is possible to reason with you, I changed my mind, it's the sign of an agile mind. Though with your recent angry string of unfounded personal attacks it appears that I may have misjudged your capacity to use logic and reason to respond. Please if you desire sane discussion reply to my comment in a rational manner. Be well.
    1
  32. KC. The bell tolls and the dog barks.
    1
  33. No One. Ding dong dingaling.
    1
  34. You want some Merchant of Venice and a bit of Othello. Then the Harvard Library is the wrong place.
    1
  35. Money baby.
    1
  36. Be in both if you wanna skullfuck with the Zorb of choice.
    1
  37. Silicon Stasi.
    1