Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Chomsky Says US Should Stay In Syria" video.
-
7
-
5
-
4
-
Except about Cambodia genocide, Vietnamese refugees, Biafra genocide, Tchad and Gaddafi, Venezuelas present government, Fall of the Soviet Union, Deng Xiaoping policies, The Clintons policies, Obama policies, recent events in Catalonia, Red Brigades in Italy, Rote Armee Fraktion in Germany and the list goes on and on, he has been wrong a lot of times, he's intelligent, he has been right sometimes, but he has also allowed ideology to blind him a lot of times.
3
-
@elchapojunior3091 The two thousand along the North Border only protect the parts of the border under Kurdish control, they cannot protect but one venue of attack, armies can move around them, the Turks can simply go south through the areas controlled by Al Nusrah or the areas directly controlled by the Turks, then they can simply swing east and take the bridges and cross the Euphrates, then the 2000 US troops would have no choice but to either fight the Turks (A NATO army with SOTA weaponry, so the American troops would be deader than mutton) or to flee into Iraq/Turkey, the Kurds would give them a hard time in Iraq, the Turks would disarm them, grab their gear and sell the info and tech to Russia and China.
So the US has to retreat in full or remain in force, remaining in detail would mean a giant clusterfuck gettting even more insane.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Vlad the guru There's no honor in real politik, I don't have some notions of honor when it comes to giant war machines wrecking entire nations, I don't oppose the Kurds having a land of their own, they can do what they want, I just don't think that all this meddling has made anything any better at all, what has been accomplished in all these resource wars, millions of dead, trillions of debt, disillusioned populace, millions of refugees causing instability for thousand of miles in all directions and for what, honor or oil, the US shit on their allies all the time, this has happened too many times to count, in this regard the US is no different than any other power.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SamiZ1960 Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, under whom, the Turks, The Arabs, The Iranians, get a grip man, then you have two main sects, minor sects, sub sects, non muslims, the loon down the corner who's a minority within a minority.
1
-
@Quinicus The Middle East, the entire Dar al-Islam(the house of Islam) exists in the minds of about 20 percent of the Muslim populace in a state of Dar al-Harb(the abode of war) ever since a Mongol Khan chopped the head off the last Caliph(hence Islamists of various varieties, they existed before the European powers began carving up the place), they simply never had a modern nation state(except Turkey), they still live in princely states(monarchy, theocracy), any of the states in the an area from Morocco to Indonesia are like this irregardless of who drew lines on a map.
So each state is basically like he princely state with its nobles, mercs, regional powers, mafia structures governing the place, to pretend that any of these states have any meaningful modern legitimacy is pointless, the Kurds are attempting to create a secular modern nation state, their neighbours don't like it or should I say the princely or theocratic rulers don't like it, Turkey is a bit different, Erdogan despite his religious tendencies acts as the executive of a nation state attempting to preserve territorial integrity due to the rise of a nation state with legitimate claims to a large part of Turkeys territory.
This is a giant clusterfuck and then for shits and giggles you add the single most important resource on the planet into the meat grinder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Vlad the guru I don't mind them having a country, but don't portay them as saints, there are no saints, I've never seen a saint, met a saint, heard a saint speak, there are just people trying to make it, the Kurds, the Assyrians, the Turkomen, the Yazidis, various Christian sects, they all just want to be left alone in their little corner of Syria, in order to make that a reality they have to secure the east bank of the Euphrates river for the strategic advantage that it imbues. Most of the Sunni Arab settlers sided with ISIS and so when the tide of war turned they fled, they fled from Syria because the Assad government wasn't their friends either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 Let us glance on a map of Afrin, what do you see, you see an infrastructure hub protected by mountains providing access to Latakia, Aleppo and to the Euphrates crossings, how would you if you were a Turkish General use this to launch an attack on Assad, Al Nusrah or the Kurds, you have access from Afrin to launch attacks on all three sides in the war and you have great logistics back to Turkey. Your 2000 peacekeepers are useless sitting along the border if Turkey decides to use their state of the art first world military against anybody in Syria, the Turks could if they wanted to do so conquer Syria in a matter of months. Who could possibly stop them, Iran, Russia, the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the Saudis can't do it because the open Syrian desert would be prime area for taking out whole divisions of Saudis from the air, the Iranians can't because they would have to cross into Iraq in force, this would be unacceptable to all factions in Iraq, the Russians wouldn't lift a finger to prevent their new Turkish friends(and they are friends ever since some retards in the US state department decided to back a coup attempt against Erdogan) from killing the Kurds, Israel simply doesn't have the strength to fight a top tier military like their own which outnumbers them at a ratio of 30-1 and so they would do a little sabre rattling at best, the US would officially condemn it and do nothing more(hoping against hope that Erdogan and Putin stops being friends).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 They cost nothing you say, it costs about 1.5 million per grunt to just keep them supplied with the basics in a warzone, water, food, boots, bootlaces, fatigues, lithium batteries, ammo etc...
Your 2000 "peacekeepers" will cost 3 billion dollars at minimum per annum, that's with no air support, no heavy gear, that's just to keep them going on foot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 How are you going to build friendships in Europe when the adventures in the middle east are causing political stability in Europe, illuminate oh sanguine wise one.
And with whom are you going to be friendly with, Macron who's facing a angry discontented populace, Merkel who's been effectively ousted by the right in her own party, May who's paralyzed by Brexit.
South China Sea you say, that would require a proxy willing to make the claim to those insignificant pieces of coral, the Spratleys, who's that going to be the proxy, the Vietnamese, the Filipinos, the Taiwanese, so you'll use the Taiwanese to do it, that's a stalemate, a costly stalemate with a costly arms race.
Invest in Africa, that's going to be real popular in London, Paris and Berlin, encroaching on their turf even more.
Non interference in South America, a few more Obradors and Chavez types will surely be a boon, that will however create a few more Bolsonaros.
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 The only added cost would just be flying them out to them you say. Supplies are from a stockpile, you replenish your stockpile, that costs money, you store perishables in refrigeration units, that costs money, gear breaks which must be replaced, that costs money, gear is used up, that costs money, planes use fuel, that costs money, trucks transporting all of it to and from the planes, that costs money, trucks and planes needs maintenance and spare parts, that costs money, the soldiers needs to get paid imminent danger pay, that costs money, soldiers are wounded or killed, that costs money...
The list goes on and on, it all costs money, lots and lots of money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 1. Are you familiar with the term mission creep.
2. We don't know that at all, we know that the Turks and the Kurds are at this very moment talking to each other, one possibility is war, another is peace.
3. Are you familiar the the phrase, "the children are our future", without a future a people is lost, how many futures were lost, this was done to make it impossible for Iraq to have a future, not to get rid of Saddam specifically, but to ensure that no matter what they would have a shortage of people in the foreseeable future who were men of fighting age or even able to fight. This is but one of the atrocities, how many in total, this was just the dead children from sanctions, how many from airstrikes, stray bullets, hit by a tank and run over by the threads, picked up a clusterbomb which looked like a toy, died from thirst because the water works had been demolished by a cruise missile, how many from disease during both wars, how many from radiation poisoning from DU ammo, from allergic reaction to cordite, imagine how many, 1 million, what about 2 million, how about 3 million...
1
-
1
-
@elchapojunior3091 1. You will not prevent anything if Turkey decide to roll down south, not unless you had enough troops to invade and depose Erdogan, good luck with that fantasy, so there's no point to maintain a skeletal force that might later become another quagmire.
2. Iraq is a puppet of Iran, how do you think those Russian planes and Iranian troops get to Syria, by teleporting?
3. First Iraq war civilian deaths, 200,000, Sanctions, 1,000,000, 2nd Iraq war, 450,000, these are civilians deaths only that can be proven to be caused by US action. This number does not include those who died in intercine conflict.
So according to you 1,6 million isn't a genocide,
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1