Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Washington Post Reporter Dave Weigel Caught Publicly Lying About Conflicts (Part 1)" video.
-
11
-
5
-
3
-
2
-
Paranoid Factoid. The dossier was written by Steele who by the way works as a professional political operative for a living, you want somebody smeared, then he's your guy, the facts that he references in the dossier was pushed to him by a member of that message board, that's why only Buzzfeed picked it up, it's fake news.
As for the hacking narrative, Wikileaks didn't hack anybody, it was leaked to them by a disgruntled DNC employee, that much has been admitted by Wikileaks.
The Leaks have been verified as true, the fact that the DNC fired Debbie and that Brazile was fired from CNN is further proof of that fact, the contents of the leaks was horrifying, try reading the email featuring Ayers and his admittance of a plan to conspire to keep the populace unaware and compliant.
As for the WaPo, the owner of a media outlet exerts great control over the outlet, for an example, see Fox News.
Hence we cannot trust WaPo to accurately report on stories that may negatively impact the owners profit margin.
2
-
2
-
Paranoid Factoid. The info within the dossier is suspect, the source of the info is known and it's from 4chan, it's fabricated as a false story to troll the operatives who looks for such things and to discredit such an operative.
" This is correct. Amazon AWS sells cloud computing. Amazon bid on a contract with the CIA for computational services. They won the contract. As a separate matter, Jeff Bezos, a founder of Amazon, also bought the Washington Post. These are two separate corporate entities. And while one might fairly say it wouldn't be in the best interest of a WaPo reporter to smear their owner's secondary corporate interests, that in no way proves collusion between WaPo editorial staff and the CIA by means of that Bezos contract.
This is a smear by Jimmy Dore. Genuinely unfair. And beside the point when one considers the interests and editorial slant of inside the beltway papers like the WaPo and NY Times have always leaned toward supporting the Washington power structure. Including that of reporting statements by anonymous intelligence community members (with White House approval). Watergate reporting was an aberration, not the norm.
I generally agree with Dore's political and social values. But I have to admit, his factual accuracy is suspect in these Youtube vids. I'm dismayed.."
What in the name of all things holy is this logos pretzel, allow me to answer this since you refuse to answer when I lanced this boil the last time, the actions of WaPo is the proof, it's in the goddamn pudding.
No it does not directly prove it, but their coverage strongly suggests that they in fact are colluding with the CIA. Quid pro quo, puto vos esse molestissimos.
2
-
1
-
1