Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Clinton Colluded With Russia To Smear Trump During Election" video.

  1. Chris Blair. Ahhahahaahahaha, you mean it was a rating by the same firms who gave every financial institution a triple A rating back in 08, Great Scott in a furnace riding a multicolored many sided rubycrested drake towards Ninghua Town, any good the Clinton Foundation does is by accident, not by design.
    5
  2. rollofnickles. The media have decided to reboot the cold war to protect the corrupt, so apparently the gathering of info It has to be done by smucks like you or me is a sad state of affairs. And on the off chance that failspeed is a Share Blue employee, well at least he/she gets paid, win win.
    3
  3. Gloat, You earned your day in the sun, but nothing will change. Better contact the Hard Bastard, Sargon of Akkad, HA Goodman, Tim Black and many others who have also vehemently disagreed with this BS narrative.
    3
  4. I was a patreon, but then Cenk and his cohorts went full hog at the Katzenberg/DNC Russia BS, leave the TYT and you'll get my measly contribution, otherwise fuck no.
    3
  5. He's probably at the Anchorage office working on a story about the declining salmon quotas.
    3
  6. fallspeed. Unreliable source, known to bleat Gloria Allred and Lisa Blooms words as gospel.
    2
  7. fallspeed. Here what is going to happen, Trump will remain president, Hillary won't go to jail, in fact nobody will go to jail, the surveillance state will be expanded and censorship will increase, people will keep making retarded statements about race and gender, death robots will patrol the skies and murder barely literate civilians far away and pollution will cause a mass extinction. PS: Don't live near an ocean or in a desert, shit will get really bad if you live there.
    2
  8. fallspeed. PPS: Godspeed and remember, soylent green is people.
    2
  9. fallspeed. Oh ffs, They would have to throw Hillary in jail for "collusion", her campaign did the same crap as Trumps campaign, here's a protip, rich people don't go to jail, the worst that can happen to either of them is a book tour and rehab, now go play with your legos.
    2
  10. fallspeed. Who did that Russian chick work for? Fusion, who did that Brit dude work for? Fusion. Finita commedia.
    2
  11. fallspeed. So two operatives, worked for the same entity offered dirt to both campaigns. And one campaign bought it, Clinton bought it.
    2
  12. fallspeed. Read the propaganda of the other side once in a while, or just read the intercept, wikileaks, those are fairly accurate sources, this media matters crap from Share Blue affiliates is worthless.
    2
  13. fallspeed. Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian chick worked for Fusion, to present a lawyer as Kremlin connected merely because she's Russian is like calling a lawyer from Las Vegas White House connected, it's so goddamned retarded. Why haven't congress allowed Natalia Veselnitskaya to testify, she wants to do it, why is she who is the only "link" between a Russian oligarch and Trump suddenly not mentioned anymore in the news, it's simple, the Dems wants this Russia story to go away, too many of them have also taken bribes from Russian oligarchs.
    2
  14. rollofnickles. Some of them are so incredibly easy to spot, you see the same legion of near identical or actually identical messages and posts on multiple platforms, here an example of one, note the spacing, sloppy work. Picked this up in three different variations on the 27th I think. Share Blue Uranium One damage control, off course the right has their versions of this, but at least they are more imaginative. "Dude, if you think the dossier is only about the "pee pee tape", you are severely misinformed. The pee tape is the LEAST relevant of the accusations in the dossier. Nobody really cares about the pee tape. Many of the accusations with actual legal issues have been corroborated. Not saying Trump colluded with Russia yet, because we have to wait until the end of the investigation to levy those kinds of claims. But it's fairly obvious both Paul Manafort and Mike Flynn DID conspire with Russia. The first charges have already been filed in the Russia probe, which means a Grand Jury would have had to seen definitive proof of wrongdoing in order to allow those charges to be filed. What, do you think everyone is making this shit up out of thin air? I know you are smart enough to realize that even the most biased (excluding the faux news sources like InfoWars) news sources don't just make things up out of thin air, they just frame stories in a way to benefit or deflect from "their side". Now, it's entirely possible that Trump didn't know about what Flynn and Manafort were doing, which would make him innocent. But please don't make these disingenuous Hannity talking points, this seems to be the only issue for which you have severe blinders on. I agree that Democrats are using the Russia scandal to deflect blame from Hillary, but the key word is "USING", not just making shit up. I also agree that Democrats need to stop blabbering about Russia and actually talk about things voters really care about. But that doesn't mean every piece of news that has come out about this is made up. Also, I'm no fan of Hillary (I think she is just as divisive as Trump on the left), but this doesn't really come close to "collusion", which isn't actually a real legal term. "Collusion" is not illegal, but conspiracy is. It is completely legal to pay an opposition researcher to investigate in other countries, as long as you are not getting your info directly from Russian officials (which is what the Trump campaign is accused of doing, along with possible money laundering in the form of payouts). And if it turns out that the Podesta was literally talking directly with Russian officials, then fine, I have no problem with anyone from the Hillary campaign going to jail. But that doesn't automatically make Trump innocent. It's like a rapist going to court with an argument of "well, other people in the past have gotten away with rape, so that means I shouldn't be prosecuted for my raping". It's a ridiculous argument. Like, what's wrong with investigating them BOTH? I don't really understand why you have such a problem with this being investigated, if they are innocent, then they will be exonerated at the end of it. I would think you would be pissed when campaigns break our already way too lax campaign finance laws, the Trump Russia thing can be a very strong argument for stricter campaign finance laws, but I guess you don't care when it comes to this specific issue. By the way, I realize I'm going to get a lot of hate on here for posting this, so I'm going to ignore the comments with ad hominems and no substance, but I am open to debating this here as long as it's civil and actually has substance instead of name-calling and pejoratives."
    2
  15. Vicky Nuland failed Clinton again, how many times can an employee fail in her task and still be an insider, let's ask Bill Kristol.
    2
  16. HerkimerSnerd. Correct, there is however a Clinton defense to keep the Queen and her cohorts out of jail.
    2
  17. Jonathan Baker. Public pressure is necessary in order for that to happen, unfortunately 37% of the population are brainwashed by the MSM and they think her beyond reproach.
    2
  18. Eric Hurt. The rule of law must be enforced to maintain the public trust.
    2
  19. "We train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won't allow them to write "fuck" on their airplanes because it's obscene!"
    2
  20. fallspeed. Yeah, yeah, a few years ago you thought the World of Wikileaks, now you don't because they revealed corruption amongst Democrats, I care for neither party, neither wing, never did, they are all corrupt. You're just a partisan hypocrite.
    1
  21. All of this leads back to Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan.
    1
  22. Fraulein, pardon me, ze veterans who waded through a river of blood and rain of steel disagrees.
    1
  23. Christopher Montemayor. And why is that Christopher, it is because of the 1000% bipartisan corruption, this minutae is emblematic, you guys are fucked and the empire is failing as all empires before it because of a disconnected political and financial class who rob all of you of your future and freedoms.
    1
  24. Mr Majestic. Democracy Now isn't funded by the Bogeyman, Democracy Now is funded by the Ford Foundation mostly, which is buddy buddy with the CIA.
    1
  25. Mr Majestic. Soros in small fry compared to the awesome power of the fully operational battlestation.
    1
  26. OG Johnson. If I were a evil bastard who wanted to spread misinformation I would craft a heavily guarded gate with a sign saying here be dragons, behind the gate I would leave a thousand lies for the unwary to believe.
    1
  27. Jon Sprague. And the president of Gabon is a saint by that logic.
    1
  28. Chris Blair. Ohh the hypocrisy, the humanity, the BS of a Hillbot trying desperately to retreat back into the Zorb of choice, all hail the lesser evil of choice.
    1