Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Republican Healthcare: A Good Sign For Progressives?" video.

  1. Based on what evidence, his stories check out, sure he's bold, but calling him fake news is similar to calling Ratigan a hack.
    9
  2. Good idea not be at a fixed location these days if you are a public figure.
    7
  3. This channel, TYT politics covered voter roll purges in Arizona and Brooklyn, verified by election officials and there are pending courtcases, this channel also covered the outright rigging of the Neveda delegates vote, so did Goodman. Paid share blue trolls fighting other paid trolls. it's insane.
    5
  4. some body. LOL, you quote snopes, I think you should go look at court transcripts yourself instead and the rulings of the courts, odd that snopes didn't include those, excuse me while I shake my head in disbelief.
    4
  5. I can't bothered to find them, should I, oh well, here someplace for you start looking. 117000 voters purged in Brooklyn by Democrats, can't have those poor folks voting for Sanders can we. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/nyregion/board-of-elections-brooklyn-votes.html?_r=0 The owners of Snopes, an advertising firm, privately held no owners listed, ain't that interesting, shall I dig deeper? https://www.linkedin.com/company/proper-io
    3
  6. some body. Chris Richmond co-owner of Snopes, owner of Proper media, let's see what fund raisers he attended in Southern California shall we?
    3
  7. some body. Your comment is the definition of moving the goal posts, first you said it never happened, now you claim it had no effect. Begone Shill, you have been BFTO.
    2
  8. some body. The owner of a media outlet has no editorial influence according to you, man you are naive or deliberate misleading others, the owner of said outlet attends a fundraiser for a candidate and you honestly believe that said outlet remains neutral. Moving the goal posts again for the whole voter purge in New York, did you know that the official who oversaw the purge used data provided from the Clinton campaign to determine which voters should be removed from the voter rolls and that said official had worked for Clinton in the past and that said official was endorsed by Clinton to hold said office, i'm sure you allready know this, shall I show you the facts or will you move the goalpost again?
    2
  9. some body. "I thought they were fake news? Who is moving the goal post now? They are the same networks that lied about Clinton being more electable than Bernie. " Are you calling MSNBC, Democracy Now, CNN, ABC and PBS fake news? For shame somebody, for shame. So did Snopes, shall find the fact checking articles they had about why the polls matching Sanders vs Trump was false and that Snopes believed Clinton to be the better candidate. Give me 5 minutes and you will have them right in front of you. But I doubt your mind is malleable enough to accept reality.
    2
  10. some body. Yeah I read them, I read them on the date they were published, I'm strange in this regard, I like reading. "They disprove them all. Where does it say he coordinates with Clinton to purge Sanders voters? I" LOL, a dude named Diane, that's one hefty squat breasty dude that Diane, his man tits are just a cover. You definitely should not get a raise.
    2
  11. some body. Nonono, little one, I present facts and logic and you do nothing out the sort, that makes you a shill, you are shill because unlike a troll you have manners.
    2
  12. some body. Cenk lies all the time, forinstance the constant lack of retractions when stories are proven to be false, no retraction is a lie by omission.
    2
  13. Vanessthebest. Fascist? are you insane, he's a raving leftie.
    2
  14. some body. Change your handle to nobody, mate, LOL, Snopes as a reliable source, it's edited facts, right now Snopes are going full throttle on the Russians are in a bowl of rice in Indochina to pop a cap in everyones ass.
    1
  15. Wiretap claims, FISA request granted, they allready admitted that they "incidentally" tapped Trump, they probably tapped Sanders too. Let's see if I armed with fingertips and imagination can find that for your lethargic mind and eyes.
    1
  16. some body. Democracy Now, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, PBS all ran the "incidentally" wiretapped story.
    1
  17. some body. Come on lazy bones, don't you wanna play no more...
    1
  18. some body. Nor did I ever use the term fraud, you did.
    1
  19. some body. Man did Snopes get this one all wrong, Clinton got hit hard my compliant and unaware friend. http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/04/wikileaks-october-surprise/
    1
  20. some body. Reply if you want me to find the articles in question from the so-called fact checking site.
    1
  21. Paul Stergios. Paulie, my man, they are paid to post, it's all good, he gets a living wage and I make sure that he can't spread lies for 15 minutes somewhere else, it's a public service on my part and it's my idea of fun when I'm bored.
    1
  22. I AM SYLAR. He won't, but Cenk won't fire him, so it's all good for Jordan and HA, Cenk ends up with mud on him and more people see that Cenk is a problem, including Jordan.
    1
  23. some body. Excuse me, did your boss tell you to try harder, ain't he getting his ticker fixed in some high price clinic or is Jennifer Granholm still running the show for you guys. The article from Snopes in my answer above was clearly biased, here are some other ones. http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/ http://www.snopes.com/uncounted-california-ballots/ http://www.snopes.com/sanders-voter-suppression-ny/ http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-won-nevada/ http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/25/what-we-know-so-far-about-wikileaks-dncleaks/ And here is the official who did the whole voter roll purge with an article about he data sourcing. http://www.wnyc.org/story/brooklyn-voter-purge-age-clinton-sanders/ Diane Haslett-Rudiano http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/election-official-ousted-error-purged-brooklyn-voters-article-1.2610369 http://nypost.com/2016/04/21/board-of-elections-official-scapegoated-for-voting-mess/ https://medium.com/@tybrown3/a-tale-of-two-clerks-what-s-really-behind-the-brooklyn-voter-purges-4cd86535f33
    1
  24. some body. You are not trolling, you are obviously shilling, big difference. Okay do you get paid per reply or by the hour, which is it? I really wanna know, obviously you do not need a raise.
    1
  25. some body. After I gave you the pertinent information disproving your points and you began to ignore facts, you are a low info voter if you are not a shill.
    1
  26. some body. Being a shill or low info are fortunately not a permanent sate.
    1
  27. some body. You did not refute any info using arguments, reason or logic, nor did you provide links to videos proving your accusation against Goodman, failing to do so renders your comments invalid.
    1
  28. some body. Brother Seamus, repost the links, you have failed to include them in previous comments. Trouble is for you though, Goodman provides links to sources with his vids. Like any good journo should do, unlike TYT.
    1
  29. some body. The Republicans control government now, they have expressed the desire to so publicly and the justice department issued a statement to that effect that a investigation is ongoing, hence the Russians a coming narrative to protect Clinton and shift focus away from her unsavory Saudi/Qatari connections.
    1
  30. some body. She's still under investigation, it never stopped, that's why the media are constantly using McCarthyism to protect her in order to protect themselves.
    1
  31. some body. Read these articles. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-unexpected-new-ally-in-the-email-investigation-president-trump/2017/03/13/ffaadf76-0827-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html?utm_term=.2f5d9407c00e https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html?_r=1 Right wing outlet explaining their intent to do so. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/chaffetz-investigation-hillary-clinton-private-email-use-not-video/ FBI FOIA Vault, pertinent. https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
    1
  32. some body. That's why she's out of the forest, trying to stay relevant, it's a shield.
    1
  33. some body. I believe the burden of evidence has shifted to you now.
    1
  34. some body. To stay in the public eye and thus retaining her shield, which is her supporters, the so-called Hillbots.
    1
  35. some body. Taking bribes from a foreign power, the very thing Hillary's cohorts accuse Trump of is treason, treason is handled by whom, by congress, do you see the game now.
    1
  36. some body. Read the WaPo article, it explains it quite well, The nuts and bolts of such an investigation is handled by the FBI, the charges are written up by the DOJ, congress then reviews the collected evidence as would a judge.
    1
  37. some body. The emails contain the evidence for the crime in question, arms to ISIS using Qatar and Saudi Arabia as an intermediary, in return for cash, that's textbook treason.
    1
  38. some body. In a investigation into treason the judiciary committee has the role of the executive, why?, because the executive cannot investigate itself.
    1
  39. some body. Civics 101. a public servant appointed by the executive cannot be properly investigated by the executive, hence oversight.
    1
  40. some body. Which is why they are also investigating Trump, in his case there are merely assertions from the executive, which by the way does not constitute evidence, which is why Adam Schiff has disappeared from the public spotlight.
    1
  41. some body. They are investigating both issues, mishandling classified info(hammers and blackberries, lol) and the Clinton foundation(IRS), that 's the pay to play half(treason).
    1
  42. some body. Now let's imagine that Trump has a problem in the future and he desires the public to be distracted, how would you accomplish that, you drag the investigation out, you have the evidence and at an opportune moment you make the charges public, Clinton's crimes are in effect Trump's shield.
    1
  43. some body. Uranium One, Uzbekneftgaz, look it up.
    1
  44. some body. Sessions reviews evidence from the FBI in concert with congress, he cannot investigate, but he can give the FBI the nod to do so. In effect Sessions is key, hence all the accusations against him(real or imagined). If somebody else were in his place, that person would also be subject to character assassination.
    1
  45. some body. The executive appoints who amongst them get a bigger part of the pie, he's buying loyalty, the best example is when he bought McCain and Graham by recommitting to endless war.
    1
  46. some body. Just start reading wikileaks, they have not denied that the emails are real regardless of the source of the leaks. The ones concerning the internal workings of the DNC and the communications between Podesta and democratic state officials are quite illuminating. Forgive me if I cannot shift through the entire thing right now, but the emails concerning the agreed upon rules in which voters are illegible to vote in Democratic primaries are informative. Dear Diane makes a surpriise appearance again.
    1
  47. some body. As for Clintons and Russia, that stretches all the way back to the nineties. Uranium One is but the latest folly. Let's just say that the Clinton's got money from an autocrat who likes to put human beings into oil drums and light them on fire.
    1
  48. some body. This individual is an interesting person is this context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame
    1
  49. some body. Start with Orthodox Hasidim and work your way up, those guys are the small fry, but it's a nice in into understanding how they operate.
    1
  50. Poor corporate Democrats all those bribes they got and still no fancy corner office for them and the Republicans are beginning to push for single payer, utterly clueless Democrats.
    1
  51. CmatthYBR. It's hilarious, read this. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/28/opinion/republicans-for-single-payer-health-care.html
    1
  52. CmatthYBR. If Obama had passed singlepayer back when the democrats had a majority in congress there would be no Trump, the mere fact that Republicans in congress are more receptive to the idea than the Democratic party leadership tells me that the Democrats are even more beholden to big pharma then the Republicans who after all have a lot of other corporate dicks to chose from. The Democrats have fewer options when it comes to corporate dick, but that big pharma cock is tingling their tonsils all day.
    1
  53. Mal c.H. Thanks babe, the NYT is the onion now.
    1
  54. Dude, I do not disagree, but republicans have a wider variety of corporate cock to blow, they have gun lobby cock, and more oil cock, the democrats only have wall street cock, pharma cock, defense contractor cock, media cock, silicon valley cock.
    1
  55. Besides it carries no risk to their donors this bill, it's the equivalent of walking around town with a sign on which you wrote "I'm a good person"around your neck after you beat a beggar to death in an alley the day before.
    1
  56. Except that protein is needed for the development of that thing inside yer skull.
    1