Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "CNN"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rebecca Sparks. "an opportunist and pragmatist, [but] definitely not a leftist" Does this description of the Honduran democratically elected president sound familiar, a populist who opposes the cartels, wishes to promote Honduran industry and puts Hondurans first, obviously he had to be ousted from power.
Extremely relevant.
"The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, more than 100 members of Congress have repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the country’s democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government “rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries,” opening the door for further “violence and anarchy.”"
1
-
1
-
1
-
Silly Green Fairy. Procedure, first you contact the DHS, ICE falls under their auspices, then you are granted a permit, surprisingly they grant these permits readily to large corporate news outlets, such as CNN or Time, neither of which are even remotely banned from entering facilities and gather photographic evidence and verbal testimonies, independent journalists are of course denied entry, that has been the modus operandi for the last 24 years, that makes Times use of this photo even more suspect, an entity which has access chooses not to use it and instead rely on a sketchy source to promote a narrative, this narrative is then magnified by other outlets, all these outlets were in the Podesta emails decribed as allies of the Clinton machine.
Google is a corporation, they like any corporations have an agenda, their search engine actively pushes their agenda, in this instance the free movement of people which would cause the abolition/weakening of the nation state and that ensures increased profits for Google, why you may ask, the nation state is the only entity with enough legitimacy to challenge multinational corporations if the leadership of the nation state chooses to do so, in the US the application of anti trust against a monopoly would severely harm Google and so they would support aything which destroys or weakens the integrity of the nation state in order to maintain their monopoly.
During the presidential primary these outlets villified Sanders and propped up Trump, it was deemed that Trump was the preferred opponent due to he fact that even the insiders in the Clinton campaign correctly ascertained that their candidate was deeply unpopular due to her blatant corruption and her utter lack of charisma.
Google's parent company, Alphabet Incorporated financially backed Clinton and their applications were promoting pro Clinton stories, the deal between Alphabet Inc. and the Clinton machine was simply, your candidate becomes president and in return nobody would even mention Anti Trust.
The independent media isn't truly independent if they have investors, these investors also have an agenda, you should always check who pays a source before you trust a source.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1