Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Time defends controversial cover of crying girl" video.
-
15
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
3
-
3
-
MrHappyBollox. Propaganda, it's just propaganda, misinformation, fake news, it is not art, the news shouldn't tell a artistically well spun lie, they should report the truth, they don't, they lie all the time, the cable news lie, print news lie, they are literally undermining the public trust and social cohesion with their lies, it can only end badly for everybody if they don't clean house.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rebecca Sparks. "an opportunist and pragmatist, [but] definitely not a leftist" Does this description of the Honduran democratically elected president sound familiar, a populist who opposes the cartels, wishes to promote Honduran industry and puts Hondurans first, obviously he had to be ousted from power.
Extremely relevant.
"The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, more than 100 members of Congress have repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the country’s democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government “rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries,” opening the door for further “violence and anarchy.”"
1
-
1
-
Silly Green Fairy. Procedure, first you contact the DHS, ICE falls under their auspices, then you are granted a permit, surprisingly they grant these permits readily to large corporate news outlets, such as CNN or Time, neither of which are even remotely banned from entering facilities and gather photographic evidence and verbal testimonies, independent journalists are of course denied entry, that has been the modus operandi for the last 24 years, that makes Times use of this photo even more suspect, an entity which has access chooses not to use it and instead rely on a sketchy source to promote a narrative, this narrative is then magnified by other outlets, all these outlets were in the Podesta emails decribed as allies of the Clinton machine.
Google is a corporation, they like any corporations have an agenda, their search engine actively pushes their agenda, in this instance the free movement of people which would cause the abolition/weakening of the nation state and that ensures increased profits for Google, why you may ask, the nation state is the only entity with enough legitimacy to challenge multinational corporations if the leadership of the nation state chooses to do so, in the US the application of anti trust against a monopoly would severely harm Google and so they would support aything which destroys or weakens the integrity of the nation state in order to maintain their monopoly.
During the presidential primary these outlets villified Sanders and propped up Trump, it was deemed that Trump was the preferred opponent due to he fact that even the insiders in the Clinton campaign correctly ascertained that their candidate was deeply unpopular due to her blatant corruption and her utter lack of charisma.
Google's parent company, Alphabet Incorporated financially backed Clinton and their applications were promoting pro Clinton stories, the deal between Alphabet Inc. and the Clinton machine was simply, your candidate becomes president and in return nobody would even mention Anti Trust.
The independent media isn't truly independent if they have investors, these investors also have an agenda, you should always check who pays a source before you trust a source.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Denika Kew. I could of course be clever like you, but that would be deceptive.
Scene: A cafe. One table is occupied by a group of Vikings with horned helmets on. A man and his wife enter. Man (Eric Idle): You sit here, dear. Wife (Graham Chapman in drag): All right. Man (to Waitress): Morning! Waitress (Terry Jones, in drag as a bit of a rat-bag): Morning! Man: Well, what've you got? Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam; Vikings (starting to chant): Spam spam spam spam... Waitress: ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam... Vikings (singing): Spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Waitress: ...or Lobster Thermidor au Crevette with a Mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam. Wife: Have you got anything without spam? Waitress: Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it. Wife: I don't want ANY spam! Man: Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage? Wife: THAT'S got spam in it! Man: Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has it? Vikings: Spam spam spam spam (crescendo through next few lines) Wife: Could you do the egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam then? Waitress: Urgghh! Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like spam! Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Waitress: Shut up! Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Waitress: Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam. Wife (shrieks): I don't like spam! Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it. I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam beaked beans spam spam spam and spam! Vikings (singing): Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Waitress: Shut up!! Baked beans are off. Man: Well could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then? Waitress: You mean spam spam spam spam spam spam... (but it is too late and the Vikings drown her words) Vikings (singing elaborately): Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mefourb. There are 1.2 million children who are illegal immigrants, there are 11.7 illegal immigrants in total, 2000+ children has been removed from their parents, some have even been abandoned by their parents, is it plausible that 2000+ children have parents who engage in criminal behaviour that aren't misdemeanors, but who are dangerous felons, I think that is plausible, are the children guilty of the crimes committed by their parents, no they are not, how would you solve this, would you put the children in jail with their parents, would you deport the children and keep their parents in jail, give me another solution to this problem that doesn't involve removing any border control.
Do you really think that out of 10.5 million human beings there are no parents who are also career criminals?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1