Comments by "No One" (@joermundgand) on "Democracy Now!" channel.

  1. David M Here's a helpful link, start reading or stay unaware and compliant. https://wikileaks.org/
    1
  2. David M Reince Priebus statements were carefully worded lawyerism, it provides an opening for either way, he's a servant of power who makes a vague homage to power in his statement, but offers again no proof. You really are quite lazy are you not, you prefer easy 5 minutes soundbites and the Iliad for dummies, TLDR kind of human being. You remain compliant and unaware.
    1
  3. David M https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774 ISIS, AL Qaeda funding. https://theintercept.com/2016/08/25/why-did-the-saudi-regime-and-other-gulf-tyrannies-donate-millions-to-the-clinton-foundation/ Donations from the Gulf States to the Clinton Foundation. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/julian-assange-clinton-foundation-isis-same-money-saudi-arabia-qatar-funding-a7397211.html Funds to the Clinton campaign from the Gulf States. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-26/hillary-clintons-state-department-approved-165-billion-arms-deals-clinton-foundation Arms sale.
    1
  4. David M That's the short end of the stick, now go find a bigger club. You remain compliant and unaware.
    1
  5. David M Compliant and unaware. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599
    1
  6. David M No, that not what I claimed and you know it. I have now provided you with proofs that she was bought to look the other way and serve the interests of an inherently hostile foreign power. Do you understand what an autocratic monarchy is? These donors are heads of state who support a political candidate in return they get what, milk and cookies? Your are even more compliant and unaware than before.
    1
  7. David M When Trump becomes the president and if he continues to maintain ties with these countries as a public servant, then yes, Houston we have a problem. But that is as of yet in the future, though he most likely will act in similar fashion to Clinton.
    1
  8. David M Foreign power backing terrorist organisation donates funds to a candidate who in return approves arms sales and advocates for a no fly zone which benefits the aforementioned organisation. And if Trump does the same thing when he becomes a public servant then he is doing the same.
    1
  9. David M Now if this is not perfectly clear to you by now allow me to illuminate you. I loathe them both, equally, but only one held public office before and used this power in a way that in a sane world would be called treason. We do not live in a sane world. I cannot be anymore clearer on this subject. Now please wake up and become aware and non compliant lest the density of your grey matter becomes as dense as kindling.
    1
  10. David M They donated in 2008 and 2016, wakey wakey.
    1
  11. David M Exactly, do you understand that sides are not important, at this point in time the US is so hopeless corrupt that corruption is applauded by the political and financial elite. If even one is punished severely for it would it not be an example to the others.
    1
  12. David M Clinton must be punished in order to keep others on their toes and in order to restore at least some public trust and if actual proof of Trump acting in the same manner surfaces, then he to must fall and for the same reason.
    1
  13. David M I'll see if can find it, but I believe Saudi Arabia donated about 25 million directly to the 2016 campaign and probably more through intermediaries. Can't remember how much the other gulf states donated precisely, but it was quite significant amounts also.
    1
  14. David M Even MSM hacks are forced to report on the obvious now. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-2016-campaign-affects-clinton-foundation-foreign-donation-policy-changes/
    1
  15. And surely this gentlemen is a source of trust. https://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/29/greenwald_why_did_saudi_regime_other
    1
  16. David M Actually it's publicly available information, disclosed contributions, bundlers, etc.. Saudi royalty owns stock in certain companies who then donate to Clinton, that's an intermediary link....
    1
  17. David M I suggest you start here and do some basic calculus. http://www.fec.gov/disclosurep/pnational.do
    1
  18. David M Agreed, but remember, pour encourager les autres....
    1
  19. David M Agreed, but focus on the most vulnerable target first, that's not Trump is it.
    1
  20. David M That's why this Russia narrative is so annoying, it's a distraction from the bipartisan corruption.
    1
  21. David M The Democrats are less fickle in their support of Clinton, get one down and the floodgates open, Trumps support is wafer thin... Much like in chess, kill the queen and checkmate the king.
    1
  22. David M Stratagem. One fall they all fall, Trumps connection are yet not as well proven as Clinton's, he's just as bad, but because he has no prior public office makes him harder to pin down. Tactic, be like Claudius with Trump, nemesis follows hubris.
    1
  23. David M Exactly, let him do it, much like you tire a fish on the line before you let the hook sink in and turn the wheel. I'm a cynic, being cynical has it's flaws, but also advantages. Compare Clinton to a crowbar, Trump to a chest.
    1
  24. David M Well, this is it for me, think about the long game, which game would you rather win.
    1
  25. Dejay Rezme To betray, to commit treason. So backstabbing is now okay, got it.
    1
  26. Dejay Rezme Besides a citizen who betrays his country fighting against his countrymen for Nazi Germany would be what? Just confused in need of a hug and some milk and cookies.... Or an actual traitor. It's all relative to the situation.
    1
  27. wikingagresor Agreed
    1
  28. Dejay Rezme Treason is linked to the concept of states as well, princely state, territorial state, state nation, nation state, do you advocate for the end of the nation state?
    1
  29. Dejay Rezme That is a classic cop out, lawyerism at it finest, the inane doublespeak of the relativist. If you believe it for the future, then you believe in it's abolishment in the now. I also believe in transparency and in exposing corruption, but if Assange was a US citizen he would be committing treason to a illegitimate regime.
    1
  30. Dejay Rezme Or the nation state experiences a renaissance, all this is for the future, there is no replacement for the nation state....
    1
  31. Dejay Rezme The nation state may even become stellar states in time..
    1
  32. Dejay Rezme And even in this future there will still be treason and traitors... It will never change...
    1
  33. Dejay Rezme And Libtards and SJW's :)
    1
  34. Dejay Rezme It makes no difference what labels idiots wear, they all remain idiots and they will always be with us...
    1
  35. The Devils of the Xin Xi Xu Dangerous precedent... To apply it ad verbatim...
    1
  36. Dejay Rezme You mean he's been watching CNN?
    1
  37. ***** Usually these groups have benign sounding names and horrible mob driven agendas, meaning they act as mindless beasts.
    1
  38. le Potterhead No, but run numbers on the amount of negative stories they run against the Democrats, then compare with Republicans, they have a bias.
    1
  39. le Potterhead DNC or GOP, the DNC are better at covering their tracks, they are simply more proficient liars.
    1
  40. le Potterhead Okay, whatever you think is true is true for you. Don't let annoying things such as reality crack your bubble.
    1
  41. le Potterhead A lot, and far more fierce in their critique.
    1
  42. le Potterhead Oh yes, they just have they ability to seem good, but they are foul.
    1
  43. le Potterhead Journos, the kind that never gets on air because they actually check their sources and do actual reportage.
    1
  44. Actually no just follow the breadcrumbs from Tampa Bay times.
    1
  45. Scotty Beeman Why should he do your civic duty, do your own homework....
    1
  46. Scotty Beeman So you can do what with it exactly?, threaten others face to face.... It's pretty simple to learn somebody's address from their profile really, takes on average 30 minutes of work to do it, but why would you desire to do so.
    1
  47. Scotty Beeman Is it not the duty of a citizen to stay informed, or will you merely accept one narrative out of many without critique. Trump or Clinton, whats the difference, two sociopaths vying for power. You have a bias and like me or anybody else you are blind to it, if it does not fit your world view it must be idiotic or wrong, Hillbots or Trumptards, whats the difference.
    1
  48. Scotty Beeman A bit slow are we, the context should be obvious now.
    1
  49. ***** Don't we all, it removes the need for thought.
    1
  50. Scotty Beeman We Access..... Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
    1