Comments by "Sim Ko" (@simko8665) on "Times Of India" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 9
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 1
  23.  @arturferrao7353  Now we can see that Jabotinsky was right in his opinion about the Arabs and what is needed for Jews to live in peace with them in this country. In his opinion, the leaders of the Jews at that time were of the opinion that it was necessary to approach the Arabs in their demands for self-determination, to get to know their mentality and thus to get closer to them so that in the end they would accept the Jews and live with them in peace. Jabotinsky did not think so. In his opinion, one should not come to a discussion with the Arabs in an inferior way. They must be put in place and let them understand that the Jews are not going anywhere and that they will act with force against force. The leaders of the Jews did not accept his opinion and worked for Arab recognition of them, something that had not happened until now, only brutal acts against the Jew. You said that the Arabs were colonized. They were not. Evey Inch of the Jewish lands were bougt by good money. It's not like the European countries which took over many African countries for free, and also other countries. The same goes also for the US. They did better by putting the Indians into refugee camps and call it reservations till today. Israel has at least a historical connection to this land. Only after October 7th did many Jews were aware to what Jabotinki wrote and change their attitude towards the Arabs and unfortunately accepted the fact that there would never be peace between these two peoples. Which means the "Iron walls" of Jabotinsky. Pity.
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1