Comments by "p11" (@porky1118) on "In Defense of "Pseudoscience"" video.

  1.  @GoodOwl0  In this case, science should be fine, but sudo science is bad :)
    1
  2. I agree, that some things don't need to be falsifiable, to be worthy, but at least according to the framework (axioms), you should be able to say something about something, which might be falsifiable. So I'd say, all science can be seen this way: Axioms and Observations => Conclusions (might be falsifiable)
    1