Comments by "" (@NoahBodze) on "Driver who ran over spectator while doing donuts now faces charges" video.

  1. It’s called negligence, Lyslie. That your low-IQ half-cousins don’t know the law doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You’re not permitted to live in an enlightenment society and be a lesser breed without the law.
    2
  2.  @bobroberts2371  Google “motte and baily fallacy,” ok? You’re in the bailey and you’re strawmanning my argument. It’s a low-IQ trick. But yes. The answer is yes. You’re the predicate to the crime and the consequences are a result of your negligence. If you’re driving without a license, then all consequences for your automotive actions belong to you. See, stupid — we had this thing called “The Enlightenment ” where we stripped governments and kings of their power and returned them to the individual within property rights they’re endowed with. The state now defends these individual rights but does not endow them. It’s really simple to marginally intelligent people to understand, so I can see how something called “the enlightenment” disqualifies your inclusion immediately and by axiom. Good talk, stupid!
    1
  3. Negligence in the commission of a crime makes the committee of the crime responsible for all other damages. This is basic law you’re fucking up.
    1