Comments by "" (@NoahBodze) on "Reuters" channel.

  1. Love how transactional this is. Media: Trump can’t tell governors what to do Also Media: Trump, do something for governors
    41
  2. “CNN failed English? That’s *umpossible*.”
    39
  3. Imagine that - a company with the means to save lives has to ask the government if it is allowed to save lives.
    26
  4. I’ve seen reports that suggest many of us may have already had it and not even known it, but you’re right to ask what seems like a very basic question.
    22
  5. McCain Dryer how many civics classes have you missed? All of them? It’s all of them, isn’t it?
    19
  6. Next time, just say “I don’t understand economics.” It’s an exponentially more honest, succinct and total tautology for the objectively stupid comment you just wrote. You’re welcome.
    11
  7. Blood Beryl Relax, stupid. Relax.
    10
  8. It’s not even theirs. They shot up some neighborhood white people built and live in their houses now.
    9
  9. And stop telling other free-born Americans what to do, too.
    9
  10. Mr Weapons of Mass Destruction is for Biden. Got it.
    8
  11. Blood Beryl But I was talking to you, not my mother, stupid. What’s solipsism really like?
    6
  12. No. That’s the entire problem and what the court ruled he couldn’t do here.
    6
  13. Ayush Dhupar No, stupid. They don’t.
    5
  14. Fascinating! Until recently it seemed like Reuters denied it, too.
    5
  15. You have a first amendment right. And, yes, it means you have a right to say objectively stupid things. Still, I support your right to say objectively stupid things.
    5
  16. Grey Dominguez stop. Take at least ONE logic class before you say another thing. Just one.
    4
  17. Male Karens are “Oscars.”
    4
  18. Any more vapid slogans you got or you just want to pretend you don’t know where everything in the modern world comes from?
    4
  19. Or just calling people wanting to stop violence “right wing.” It’s all preposterous.
    4
  20. Tony Mancuso Immaterial. They’ve simply described a reverse placebo effect. One need not a medical license to understand this... only not be you.
    4
  21. Fundraising.
    4
  22. Vikman Photography Of their “protections” are more than my protections, then that’s literally privilege.
    3
  23. miguel garcia You suck at more than previously shown. But you’re awesome at non sequiturs!
    3
  24. Face palm harder, stupid. Maybe knock some sense into yourself. A real estate mogul wants to PREVENT new building to shrink supply. You’re ignoring basic economics because ... Orange Man!
    3
  25. You don’t know what anything means.
    3
  26. MrTommyboy68 That you’re chose that as your argument proves my point, objectively stupid person. You owned yourself, stupid.
    3
  27. Cam “the times” don’t change first principles, they only make the weak fear their own freedom.
    3
  28. Teufel Hunden and it’s why drugs cost so much. Clap for the exorbitant prices you proudly created! Clap for the people who couldn’t try new drugs because the government said no and they died! Clap for your smugness!
    3
  29.  C O  You've just done what a psychiatrist calls projection. It's a basic case. But... youre basic. There's literally no depth to you other than your solipsitic "resistance," is there?
    3
  30. It’s like you’re in a contest to demonstrate how little you know and how vapidly you don’t know it!
    3
  31. Indeed. These pseudo martyrs of yours are getting harder and harder to prop up.
    3
  32. You’ve literally never had an original thought in your life.
    2
  33. PasadenaSue How big an objective idiot do you have to be to consider another’s simp’s quixotism as “well said?” I do hope you answer.
    2
  34. Diamondgirl Kat Thank you for affirming that capitalism is the ownership of one’s own labor AND that you owned yourself with that comment. But no, I did not exploit you. I only won the argument on your labor, stupid.
    2
  35. CONSERVATIVES: “Despite controversies that rage over immigration, it is hard to see how anyone could be either for or against immigrants in general. First of all, there are no immigrants in general.” - Thomas Sowell LIBERALS: “Who will pick your fruit and clean your toilets?”
    2
  36. Johnny Kat says never ask questions and obey authorities at all times!
    2
  37. simonberry512 Yeah, it’s like betting on the spread of a football game after it’s over. No risk, all credit. That’s 2009-2017, in a nutshell.
    2
  38. It’s funny how much Trump is in your head.
    2
  39. His belief is immaterial - the facts correlate. That you don’t believe it is more telling.
    2
  40. JACE read their website, stupid. They’ve culturally appropriated Karl Marx and thrown in Gramsci for their entire platform. You can’t be this stupid. Or... can you?
    2
  41. Good call, Tiny-Brained Chuck!
    2
  42. And you care so much about his life he’s become your personal Emmanuel Goldstein.
    2
  43. Picolas Cage If you’re really interested in this, then read about how Sartre and Camus split on the political ramifications of freedom. Both believed, and I agree, that man is condemned to be free but many fear that freedom, which they shouldn’t. But Sartre, the rich-kid intellectual, went full Stalinist while Camus, the born-poor but handsome kid, favored freedom and all its absurdity.
    2
  44.  @IForgetWhatISay  Nice! Really strive for the inner stupid you've only so far dabbled with.... show us how stupid you really are. That comment was an amazing start, stupid!
    2
  45. mack smith No they can’t. It’s just the “oppression” of having to be treated like everyone else.
    2
  46. Conversely, you don’t know shit about anything. It’s called the Rick Wahl paradox.
    2
  47. So this is what the news is now, huh? Twitter beefs.
    2
  48. I’m pretty sure this is just a dry run for aliens. Or maybe they want us all to just stay at home while Godzilla fights Mothra. I bet Trump is stunned that there’s an actual Mothra.
    2
  49. Matt Papagio it’s mindless slogans like these that, were you more cognizant, would cause you to recognize why no one takes you seriously about anything.
    2
  50. Ken Hudson That you interpreted my critique of a vapid statement as an endorsement of Trump is why you’re objectively stupid, too. Take. At. Least. One. Logic. Class. Stupid.
    2
  51. So you want everyone to know how little you know about the law? If so, mission accomplished, stupid.
    2
  52. AlbertV90 And here I was supportive of you coming out.... but, as predicted, more objectively stupid opinions from you! Keep up your stupid hits! It’s what you do, you quixotic fuck! Go, Stupid!
    2
  53. Any other vapid platitudes you want to parrot from other people or is this what you in lieu of making an actual argument?
    2
  54. Mark Lee Fallacy of assumption. I won this argument by you owing yourself! Nice work, stupid!
    2
  55. Grant Brown your sanctimony and incuriousness would be funny if it weren’t so counter factual and vapid. But that’s you, huh? Vapid and counterfactual.
    2
  56. R Harish Jobs, stupid. That’s why. There’s literally nothing intelligent about that point save for the low level of thinking you already do.
    2
  57. _ David _ “I don’t know what’s going on so it’s their fault.” Idiot.
    2
  58. You’ve never had a original thought in your life, have you. That was rhetorical.
    2
  59. Martin Grabau I suppose they could get jobs at your unique start up, amirite?
    1
  60. I remember 2008, when “white credibility” for the DNC ticket was all left-wing pundits talked about. Obama used Biden for that, so, you’re right - some friend he is to return the “favor.”
    1
  61. Antwyne Jones Oh, there’s rules? Tell me, idiot, what are these rules and where are they written?
    1
  62. Diamondgirl Kat I’m mocking your low intellect, stupid, and how you owned yourself. I can’t do it any slower for you.
    1
  63. Like she’s fucking royalty or something....
    1
  64. salmonline You’re prolific at being stupid, dude. It’s fascinating to watch and I await the next objectively stupid thing you say! It’s like watching a puppy try to understand glass!
    1
  65. Roslina Tamold I also understand economics. And I’m right.
    1
  66. Oh Boy You’re basic, too.
    1
  67. Dana Chandler Nope. You only owe the acknowledgement to me of being right. You’re welcome, too, stupid!* *I “dumbed this down”‘for you.
    1
  68. Dana Chandler also, take at least ONE logic class before you die.
    1
  69. miguel garcia Ahem - next time, objectively stupid person, just say “I don’t understand economics....”
    1
  70. Oh Boy who asked you? There’s your petard, stupid. Nice work! BTW - the way you owned yourself without me saying anything and me objectively winning the argument doesn’t NOT mean I “exploited” you. You own your labor.
    1
  71. miguel garcia that’s a non sequitur, stupid. You’re unwittingly proving my point; but “unwitting” is where you’re a Viking, huh? You’re welcome for that first step in learning logic, too!
    1
  72. Thanks, motive police! You just said that because you’re objectively stupid.
    1
  73. Nico Robin tell me a out the recent war we had with Korea, then, stupid. Tell me all about it!
    1
  74. It’s their business model.
    1
  75. What you said is a tautology for “I’m stupid.”
    1
  76. ATL Guera Ok, Stupid. Also, don’t lie. You saying “I think” is not an accurate state of affairs.
    1
  77. Bikini ActiveWear History 1500 British citizens have been deported since 2017, and 500 people from Romania and Hungary in 2017 alone. But you go on with your stupid narrative.
    1
  78. Nabiha Iffath YOU focus on “certain people.” Undocumented Irish, British, Hungarian and Romanian people have also been deported. If you understood economics - huge if - then you’d know when you shrink the labor pool wages go up. Until 2016, this was what Democrats believed.
    1
  79. Leon Kennedy Performative. Logically fallacious. What’s it like to be more objectively stupid than someone you despise?
    1
  80. It’d be Ok if they were hounds for useful information. Asking a doctor about politics question after question means they abdicated their responsibly to their readership, their shareholders and their profession.
    1
  81. You should check out this invention called “Google.” You can enter “keywords” into a “search engine” and return results! It means you don’t have to talk in the second person to a video that can not answer you. Also, remember to breathe, stupid.
    1
  82. Jack Johnson Google”Hitchens Razor.”!Dismissed.
    1
  83. Abtahi Tishad Hey, stupid. This is about media. Focus, stupid. Focus!
    1
  84. Sean Blak You know the statistic you cited is based on modeling, right? Don’t site things as fact based on models - they’re all wrong. All of them.
    1
  85. It’s the American way for a president to invent law, then refuse the appeal of that invented law?
    1
  86. Victor Blüd There’s also something called “the free market” that puts premiums on doctors who know what they’re talking about and consumers who know how to find them. Check out how competition works in Econ 101. Also, check out this cool concept called “negative liberty.” It’s all the rage with people who wrote successful constitutions even if the people living under them - cough, YOU cough - don’t understand it and even argue against it.
    1
  87. Leggo My Ego Next time, just say “I don’t understand economics.” It’s more succinct and would have spared us all your objective stupidity.
    1
  88. It’s like you want everyone to know how objectively stupid you are. But hey, it’s your right to say unoriginal, vapid things and you, being you, won’t change that anytime soon, huh, stupid.
    1
  89. Ricardo Chucky I knew your tiny brain wouldn’t let me down, objectively stupid person! And how familiar are you with the presidents member of you can recognize it. See, you’re THAT unthinking and stupid. A rare combo!
    1
  90. It’s funny to me that he didn’t say the President’s name but you can’t get him out of your mind, objectively stupid person! Actually, that’s not funny. It’s remarkably sad.
    1
  91. Harold Moore Not for literally everything, no, he doesn’t. Obama hasn’t given an extemporaneous speech since Derrick Bell lost tenure Harvard in 1990.
    1
  92. pimpo yepez You’ve disqualified yourself as arbiter of anyone’s intellect with that objectively stupid syllogism.
    1
  93. Harold Moore Your name is Harold, that says it all. Learn to make an argument, stupid.
    1
  94. Boom ds You dip. “Good” and “effective” are decoupled concepts. And how weak are you to go to the feels and not objectivity.
    1
  95. Picolas Cage So you’re not interested in learning about freedom. Fair enough.
    1
  96.  @Wishdom-j3b  your vapid moral posutring is both counterfactual and boring.
    1
  97. “What?”
    1
  98. strong foot Again, it’s your right to say objectively stupid things. You don’t disappoint.
    1
  99. Randy Rick Maybe because no one is - not even you.
    1
  100. Randy Rick That reply didn’t seem so humanitarian or godly, my dude. It was right where everyone’s motives are - themselves. Thanks for proving my point!
    1
  101. Will2fite I do know this. Read the headline and article - the premise is that a behemoth, unaccountable government agency knows more about virality than a billion-dollar company staffed with scientists and built in results... because “altruism.” I’ve been to Abbott’s campus north of Chicago. I trust them and I trust markets over government every time. Sometimes Trump does, too.
    1
  102. Nope. They’d be speaking Russian.
    1
  103. A fucking simp, Fischer Hill, defers to unelected “experts” even as they’ve been consistently wrong. Get some diapers for your head, shit for brains.
    1
  104. Jacob L Whats solipsism really like? Is it as vapid and irascible as you’ve just made it sound?
    1
  105. Jean-Pierre Mutin Next time, just say “I don’t understand economics.” It’s exponentially more succinct and honest than that sclerotic drivel you pumped out. You blew it this time, stupid, but NEXT time....
    1
  106. Koubiak Your mother is in an electoral race? Of course she isn’t, stupid. But she’s a dead clam.
    1
  107. He’s also filled up your head, Emmanuel Goldstein style, and crowded out your ability to have original thoughts.
    1
  108. Ken Hudson Vapid, huh. Stupid, huh.
    1
  109. Starfock you are that simple, aren’t you? Naive Manichaeism is your thing, huh, stupid. Who broke all the glass in America? Who did all the rioting and killing? Yes, stupid. It was the left. All of them.
    1
  110. Grey Dominguez the irony of branding “all people.” You do know that 70 percent of all Trans Atlantic slaves were taken by people with last names like yours, right?
    1
  111. You’ve come out as stupid and I couldn’t be more proud of your identity! Congrats, stupid! I can’t wait to hear the next stupid thing you’ll say!
    1
  112. AlbertV90 When did I defend trump? I didn’t vote for him. Stupid is offensive in itself and, well, you’re objectively stupid. Now what’s the next stupid thing you’ll say? You won’t disappoint, will ya, Stupid. It’s literally your life,
    1
  113. AlbertV90 A fact is a thing in itself, stupid. It’s so simple, but you can’t grasp it and, worse, you compound this previous stupidity so proudly and predictably. You’re so stupid that it’s offensive.
    1
  114. AlbertV90 That you’re too stupid to understand you’re stupid shall henceforth be called the AlbertV90 Paradox. You’ve empirically demonstrated an obstinate unwillingness to learn with a predictably weak spiral into more objective stupidity. “Yet his wackjob[sic] supporters...” This ought to be rock bottom for you, but I know you. You’re basic and stupid, so, again, I can’t wait to hear the next stupid thing you say!
    1
  115. AlbertV90 The AlbertV90 Paradox!
    1
  116. C O where do you get me defending Trump? See, that’s why you’re stupid.
    1
  117. Jessica Stern it’s as if you’re advertising your paucity of knowledge.
    1
  118. TRE45ON what point could you possibly be making?
    1
  119. dixie normus I support your first amendment right to speech even if you use it to say objectively stupid things! I can’t wait to hear the next objectively stupid thing you say!
    1
  120. Osyrus I support your first amendment right to say objectively stupid things!
    1
  121. Susan K I support your first amendment right to say objectively stupid, unthinking slogans!
    1
  122. First, “too.” Second, how weak a mind do you have that defers to an elected official the exercising of your rights? That’s rhetorical. I don’t expect a cogent answer because you’re incapable of conjuring one.
    1
  123. You’re still stupid a year later, and even more poor. This is what happens when you embrace stupid ideas, stupid.
    1
  124. kimba dull haha - like this simp does research. It’s empirically clear his “research” is the result of his own solipsism. We’re just lucky to get to see how objectively stupid people “think.”
    1