Comments by "" (@NoahBodze) on "Tom Nicholas" channel.

  1.  @adroitdroid5989  You haven’t read what he wrote in the rest of his life. Try “Second Thoughts on James Burnham” or “Rudyard Kipling,” where he says “all left wing parties in highly industrialized countries are at bottom a sham.” Ya know. Learn something.
    7
  2. “All left-wing parties in highly industrialized countries are at bottom a sham.” Orwell. “So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t know that fire is hot.” Also Orwell.
    6
  3.  @renlevy411  No. He hated marxists and kept a list of them so they never work at the BBC, so not a “comrade”, he was most definitely a nationalist so not an anarchist. It’d probably be helpful for you to read what he wrote.
    6
  4. Race is not a social construct. My white wife and I will not have an Asian baby. Don’t fall for this low-IQ paradigm of “social construct.” Language is a social construct. Money is a social construct. It’s all so tiresome to listen to.
    5
  5.  @merlintym1928  Your inability to grasp simple things isn’t my problem.
    3
  6.  @Queijogostoso  An “anarchist” that would stand for God Save the Queen and shame others who did not? Humans are complex, even when they are concise. And just because a man had great thoughts does not mean all his thoughts are great.
    2
  7.  @renlevy411  If you had taken my suggestion and read Second Thoughts on James Burnham, then you'd see where he came UP WITH THE IDEA of 1984. But you don't read much, so you say stupid things.
    1
  8.  @Queijogostoso  He ridiculed people who wouldn’t stand as people who’d rather steal from the poor box than feel any ordinary emotion. Orwell was a national socialist, truly. He may not have liked the strongmen at the head of collectivist philosophies but he was in favor of fascism as it was doctrinally written. You can redistribute wealth or protect workers and industries without the state. Besides — An anarchist is a free marketeer. Orwell was not that, either.
    1
  9. It is, indeed, a sad existence is you are so dim and incurious that you considered this drivel worthwhile.
    1
  10.  @saa-wnbaw  And? So you are those races. Your future genes will have traits of those things. How you look is immaterial. We’ve coded DNA. If you have no Arab genetics, there is no chance of your children having Arab DNA. This isn’t hard. Why do you want to make this difficult?
    1