Comments by "" (@NoahBodze) on "Vaush & Ana Kasparian FAIL Discussing Men" video.

I don’t think you do, either. Fascism is Italian, not German. Germans would never have named a nativist movement after a Latin idea. No one who understands European history can not realize what the Rhine-Danube barrier meant to Germanic peoples. The only thing fascists and national socialists had in common was a nationalist response to internationalists — many from outside their country — suddenly in charge of their resources. Sound familiar? You have to remember that at one end of the beer hall putches was Hitler but AT THE OTHER end was Rosa Luxembourg, a feral outsider communist from another country. She wasn’t just not a German, but she wasn’t Christian and wasn’t a laborer — she wasn’t even 5 feet — and she was shouting about “modes of production” and overthrowing the system when the Austrian painter was talking about getting their pride back and kicking out all the outsiders. Sound familiar? Mussolini was seeing the same thing. He put Gramsci in prison, even though they both once edited the same socialist newspaper, because these are intellectual-outsider types were suddenly in charge. FDR admired Mussolini and said so, and you got a good look at what fascism really is during the New Deal United States. Fascism is almost entirely economics — a king of collective muscular Keynesianism with a nationalist backstory. Hayek once said that if he had a chose an “ism” to live under if he couldn’t have capitalism and he said fascism, run by either the English or Americans. I am not a fascist, but there are other 50 things I can think of right now that are worse than national syndicalism.
4
@stevensugars3957 None of them were "fascists." They were all managerialists. We make mistakes looking at history through politics and not psychology. Fascism is the response to feral psychopaths who don't come from where you do and who want to take you over. Seeing this similarity isn't political, either, its just the politics of how to fight it. The response we call Fascism becomes collectivist because it must grow ways to fight the collectivists, very much like the French had to get better archers if they were going to stop the English archers from taking them over in the 100 years war. If they escalate their attempt to take you over, you escalate your response. . In reality, a fascist can not exist under any definition without the outsider communist doing what they do. What we call fascism is really just a group reaction to a group aggintant, communists. Political is always far more guttural than the intellectuals who lead it. A fascist begins with the premise than they're being taken over by outsiders. That's about as deep as it gets for most and, to be honest, its the right response.
1
@Lonovavir You also have to start by understanding that fascism is one of the least bad things you can be, politically, and the word was purposely dirtied because its what combats the plans outsiders have for you. Notice that they call everything nativist "fascist?" You should understand that what you're being called is better understood as what they are telling you they are. You're a fascist because you are in their way. But you're the one who has been here longer. Fascism, at its core, is THAT instinct. That feeling that you, the one who is trying to assert authority over me, is new around here. That's where it starts. The economics that define it are essentially an intellectualized way to justify that guttural feeling that we all have — and should — toward outsiders. Contrary to history, white europeans are the only people who didn't first throw spears at their visitors. We've learned some tough lessons from not doing this.
1