Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "The Future of Ideology." video.

  1.  @DaDARKPass  >Libertarianism is a dumb idea that would never work Worked in the Icelandic Commonwealth >there's no such thing as a fourth reich They call themselves the "European Union" >Uk's firearm laws don't need to be changed It's extremely difficult to get firearms. Even if you are a farmer or a gamekeeper, you can't get any of the fun ones.
    6
  2.  @lukeerickson8590  Europe needs to grow a pair of balls. Cope more.
    4
  3.  @DaDARKPass  Campaign to lower taxes in order to fulfil the "right to estate" part of liberalism, or maybe campaign to get out the Fourth Reich, or campaign to repeal the copious Firearms Acts we have and so on.
    4
  4. You believe in a method?
    2
  5. If only they were more liberal.
    2
  6.  @DaDARKPass  Flawless counter argument.
    2
  7. I'll just ask you this: If most linguists agree that the urheimat of the Indo-European language family is southern Russia, how did Indo-European languages get to India?
    2
  8.  @simulify8726  Plot twist, only Indian nationalists believe this.
    2
  9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1qBRcN7R5U&t=10s
    1
  10. I know he was an absolute lad but I didn't know he was a force of nature that could create cyclones at will!
    1
  11. He couldn't create cyclones no matter how much you like him.
    1
  12.  @bittujpatel  >no drought neither natural disaster at that time One of the deadliest cyclones in Indian history took place in October 1942, from the 14th to the 18th. 61,000 people died, and wind speeds were up to 225 km/h. Cyclones and other depressions continued to ravish the Bengal Coast for much of '43.
    1
  13.  @kurianjose9088  >he diverted food from civilians in Bengal to the British soldiers fighting in europe Firstly, a fair deal of the food was being diverted to Indian forces fighting in Burma, which also may have caused an increase in prices for grains. Secondly, Churchill coerced Australia into sending 350,000 tonnes of wheat to Bengal. >He replied "why isn't Gandhi dead yet?" Good question. The Marwari supporters of the INC egged on an increase in prices in order to embarrass the Muslim government in Bengal according to the War Cabinet. In Churchills own words, he wanted “the best possible standard of living for the largest number of people.” and if that meant stopping the people trying to make things worse, so it must be.
    1
  14.  @kurianjose9088  I know. I say the main cause of the famine was a cyclone, he says there was no natural disaster, I counter this with the fact that the deadliest cyclone since records began took place.
    1
  15.  @kurianjose9088  It would have probably stopped many from dying though. I have found no evidence saying it was sent to the rich, and my main point was if Churchill didn't care about the Indians, why did coerce an Anglo nation into sending food to India?
    1
  16.  @kurianjose9088  That and the cyclone destroying the harvest. There is not just one reason for everything.
    1
  17.  @kurianjose9088  In general, you are right. It should be noted they were egged on by Hindu nationalists looking to embarrass the Muslims. Not sure what Churchill had to do with it though, especially with the whole send grain from Australia thing.
    1
  18.  @kurianjose9088  Well nah. You can't have drought after a massive cyclone.
    1
  19.  @kurianjose9088  You are looking at it with hindsight. Churchill didn't know any of that at the time.
    1
  20.  @kurianjose9088  I find that unlikely as in his own words, "Peace, order and a high condition of war-time well-being among the masses of the people constitute the essential foundation of the forward thrust against the enemy."
    1
  21. What are the opinions on Hirohito?
    1
  22.  @arc8244  concerned faces
    1
  23. Turkey: Allow me to introduced myself
    1
  24. How is he racist?
    1
  25. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aktJ5qGrYo
    1
  26.  @DaDARKPass  >The Icelandic Commonwealth existed in the 900s and was between a tiny group of people Why couldn't it work in units of 50,000 people then? >Capitalism didn't even exist in the 900s Markets had always existed. >On the eu, you're an idiot k >On guns, why would a farmer need a fun gun? I know a farmer who has an airgun and he's doing completely fine with it. My point was, most people cannot get armaments such as recoilless rifles, artillery pieces, "high calibre" pistols, armed UAVs and munitions for 4th generation MBTs. You can't even have PAVA spray ffs.
    1
  27.  @DaDARKPass  If my government has main battle tanks in the army, you had best believe that if it becomes tyrannical I would want to be on equal footing thank you very much.
    1
  28.  @DaDARKPass  Doesn't matter how trained and professional an army is, they are going have a hard time penetrating composite armour with reactive modular add on armour, especially with a Trophy active defence system.
    1
  29. Churchill sent grain to India from Australia.
    1