Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28.  @dannyhalas9408  13:39 I think this part of the video explains why profits and losses reveal efficiency. Medicare and medicaid are funded by the government, and the increase in healthcare costs correlate exactly around the same time these programmes were instituted, according to Consumer Price Index and Medical-care price index from 1935 to 2009. You can try to sell a product as expensive as you wish, at the end of the day, if people are your primary market, you need to have a price which they can afford. You don't need to have as low as a price as you can afford when you are primarily selling your products to a state. And as for railway... In 2016, there were 1.718 billion journeys on the National Rail network, making Britain's the 5th most used in the world. Since privatisation, the number of national rail journeys had increased by 117% by 2014 and according to a 2013 Eurobarometer poll, satisfaction with rail of UK respondents was the second-highest in the EU, behind Finland. The rate of improvement increased compared to that experienced in the last years of BR, according to research by Imperial College London. The researcher said their findings showed that 150 people had probably lived who might have been expected to die in crashes had pre-privatisation trends continued. I'll give you there has been confusion about responsibilities that has led to several safety-critical incidents and incurred high costs for companies and passengers, but overall, were getting better bang for our buck.
    2
  29. 2
  30.  @BlackpilledBuddha6476  >You redefine terms over and over again as a form of ad hominem fallacy to insult the mixed economies we have today that you deem to be "Socialist" Offer an alternative definition then. >Economic systems don't change the [thing that is in cells]s of people which is why Marxists and libertarians are both wrong as each other. Nonsense. [thing that is in cells] editing technologies would be greatly advanced in a libertarian society. >bad toothbrush moustache man didn't abolish the profit motive Before the war, taxes on profits were increased for all businesses with annual returns of more than 50,000 reichsmarks. This tax reached 40%. But in mid-1941, this was raised again to 50% of profits. And on the first of January, it was raised to 55%. Industrialists complained that some 80 to 90 per cent of business profits were being siphoned off by the state. >he didn't nationalise small or medium-sized businesses It is almost as if he wanted to conquer the USSR first so he could get the resources to run these businesses properly... >private property still existed Private property was in fact suspended under the Reichstag Fire Decree. >and exchange of products were voluntary. As it was in the Soviet Union. >He checked 3/4 "capitalist" pillars except for the "free market" element. Clearly not. >See what I mean? Nope >You redefine his mixed economy as "Socialist" I am just saying bad toothbrush moustache man was a socialist, I am using his economic policies to show part of this. >equate it to the Russian economy as a form of false equivalence fallacy Never did that, but it probably would look like the Russian economy if bad toothbrush moustache man won WW2 and somehow managed to live past 70. >It's off topic but I just want to add that individualists are always crushed by the State Not necessarily. They could fall through the floor of a hardware shop. >groups triumph over the individual It depends on the armament. >economies will always be controlled by a centralised authority (government) Sounds unprofitable. >and that you're on the losing side of history. >implying that the Soviet Union wasn't a massive failure
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2