Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. No society is without regulation, even if there is no government regulation.
    2
  2.  @paidgovernmentshill_6950  Yes really. As for "Lol ur just tik", TIK knows better than to respond to morons.
    2
  3.  @paidgovernmentshill_6950  Probab;y because I comment a lot. It's simple mathematics.
    2
  4.  @liamdevine8063  Why is it a nonsense attempt?
    2
  5. This Hitler fellow seems like a collectivist and then some.
    2
  6. We wouldn't have to beat them if the boche didn't try to revive it every time we looked away.
    2
  7.  @seppshlllearningcenter419  Maybe in Germany (they are a lost cause anyway) but I would hardly say that Bojo is a card carrying pinko.
    2
  8. They foresaw a bunch of immigrants committing crimes and said "you know what? May as well become criminals ourselves. "
    2
  9.  @Aspirintax  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksAqr4lLA_Y
    2
  10. How can he speak about the war, and not the direction of resources which allowed it?
    2
  11. Amazing how many words you used to ultimately say nothing.
    2
  12. Well thanks for vindicating TIK, since he addressed this in the video
    2
  13. The fact that there are multiple sources for each claim in this video contradicts the proposition that hitler's socialism is ahistorical.
    2
  14. btw 6:05 plotinus is not a christian
    2
  15.  @Matttheyapp  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzmXjvj4dik&t=4s
    2
  16.  jeff jr  1) TIK is a classical liberal 2) To be fair, Adam Smith sounds like a Maoist once you look at some of his opinions on landlords.
    2
  17.  jeff jr  Nah, I said Adam Smith sounds like a Maoist once you look at some of his opinions on landlords, not that he was a Maoist totally
    2
  18.  jeff jr  Citation needed
    2
  19.  jeff jr  Why not citation?
    2
  20.  jeff jr  It was you who forgot.
    2
  21.  jeff jr  >hahahahahahwhwhwhwhwh embarassing loser
    2
  22.  jeff jr  CItation needed.
    2
  23.  jeff jr  >you got embarrassed Prove it
    2
  24.  jeff jr  You are in more desperate need of such advice than I am.
    2
  25.  jeff jr  For your comment above.
    2
  26.  jeff jr  Takes one to know one.
    2
  27.  jeff jr  >I know you are a child I'm 134, check yourself
    2
  28.  jeff jr  Prove it.
    2
  29. Volk n (genitive Volkes or Volks, plural Völker, diminutive Völkchen n or Völklein n) people, nation, folk, tribe, race (group united by culture, history, descent, and/or language)
    2
  30. How did Hitler pull Germany from depression after WW1?
    2
  31. This comment was fact checked by diciples of Zitelmann False
    2
  32.  @charleymount582  This doesn't seem like a definition of state socialism which would apply to anything in reality, since it is impossible for the same scarce item to be directed in mutually exclusive ways by people who disagree on how it should be used. Hence, collective ownership is impossible.
    2
  33.  @charleymount582  Seems like a very large area covering a large number of people, surely there had to be disagreements over what to do with the goods they had? If so, then one party would have to win this dispute, and they would be the owner rather than the loser. They would not both collectively own it.
    2
  34.  @charleymount582  Why do you think we need property rights and ownership in the first place?
    2
  35.  @charleymount582  So it doesn't matter who gets to do what with things?
    2
  36.  @charleymount582  So we do need some form of property rights?
    2
  37.  @charleymount582  And why do you think there needs to be this property right?
    2
  38.  @charleymount582  But what would any of these property rights would matter if both parties in a dispute could direct goods in mutually exclusive ways at the same time?
    2
  39.  @charleymount582  And why is it Ivan's and not yours as well at the same time?
    2
  40.  @charleymount582  Is it not possible for someone to co-own something?
    2
  41.  @charleymount582  So if I co own a car with you, and you wish to drive it to Boston and I wish to drive it to Los Angeles, who wins in that conflict?
    2
  42.  @charleymount582  Socialism isn't about how resources should be directed?
    2
  43.  @charleymount582  So socialism has nothing to say if a capitalist directs a capital good how he pleases?
    2
  44.  @charleymount582  So socialism would say I should be allowed to direct my car?
    2
  45.  @charleymount582  So socialism is about how resources should be directed?
    2
  46.  @charleymount582  Never heard of the socratic method?
    2
  47.  @charleymount582  yep
    2
  48.  @charleymount582  yep
    2
  49.  @charleymount582  yep
    2
  50.  @charleymount582  Let's pick up where we left of:- socoalism doeshave something to say about how resources should be directed?
    2