Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1.  @dr1flush  Because at this point I am bloody tired of transcribing and summarising different parts of the video because communists refuse to watch the video.
    34
  2.  @owningdishonestshills7435  Well, it is, and anyone who says otherwise is actually the ones trying to redefine capitalism. https://www.etymonline.com/word/capitalism
    32
  3. I like how since my comment got pinned most of the critical comments are now directed toward the first section.
    31
  4.  @RobinEvans1234  Watch section 5, section 5 again, and then section 6.
    31
  5. complaining about others not speaking your language and then saying you would rather not speak your language
    29
  6.  @owningdishonestshills7435  Alright, well since you couldn't be bothered to open your OED to the "S" section, here you go: https://www.lexico.com/definition/state
    29
  7. Can I just say how sexy the 1080p 50 fps looks?
    28
  8.  @sjsupa  "Alright Mr - ahem - Comrade Xi, I said it, please give me back my family"
    28
  9.  @personaa422  Correction: they never desired Marxism. They desired the "People's State".
    27
  10.  @jrenjrapiro817  You clearly haven't watched the video. Try again. Could you at least give me a pastebin link to all the sources that supposedly refutes Hitler's socialism? And no, I do not think that it was based off an economic reasons. I have no clue where you got that from. Listen come back when you can read
    27
  11.  @matthewbadley5063  5 million losses is nothing when you have 150 million people.
    27
  12.  @TheImperatorKnight  It is support for the Scottish Libertarian Party candidate for the constituency of Motherwell and Wishaw and (because of the very complex Scottish voting system where everybody gets two votes) the electoral region of Central Scotland, Mark Meechan. Scottish elections are in three days, their ambition is to beat the Greens.
    26
  13.  @dr1flush  No, I follow the facts.
    25
  14. You should try having some Panzerschockolade, it works wonders
    24
  15.  @junanougues  This Hitler fella sounds a bit like Stalin.
    24
  16.  @jrenjrapiro817  Literally everything you just said in the first paragraph was refuted in Sections 5 and 6. I am not spending an hour transcribing them. Second off, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPCH4rZU-3Q&t=57s but all that was proven by Evans was Hitler was more focused on race rather than class. No, I am following the evidence from what Hitler himself thought to how the Nazi economy worked. Yes, he was a traditionalist, a believer in *Lebensraum and an anti-Semite but all these play into his belief in the Volksgemeinschaft. He believed that only Aryans could create nations and that nations fall when Aryans dilute their blood [Mein Kampf, Page 259], and since he believed that the Jews never had a nation, they were somehow inferior. Hence he believed they were plotting the downfall of Germany and that he needed to unite the German people, and remove all people he deemed to be co-conspirators. You are opening the door to [redacted] denialism. By denying his socialism, there are but two conclusions: 1) He was "madman Hitler" which is hard to believe, nobody votes for lunatics or 2) it didn't happen. No, I am not saying that social democrats are Nazis. And finally, yes, it was based in a belief that da juice was going to destroy civilisation. However, this does lead Hitler to implement autarky, which is about economics.
    23
  17.  @jrenjrapiro817  Nah, if you really tried you could probably live rent free in my head
    23
  18.  @jrenjrapiro817  >Lol u don't follow the facts and lodjik A) For facts, how about Mein Kampf, Hitler's Second Book, the Reichstag Fire Decree, Hitler's Beneficiaries, Hitler: The Policies of Seduction, Wages of Destruction, The Oxford English Dictionary and The Coming of the Third Reich. For logic, how about you learn what Tu Quoqe is and then get back to me.
    22
  19. In complete fairness to Epicurus, at least he actually practiced what he preached
    21
  20. ​ @jrenjrapiro817  Firstly, the definition of socialism according to the Oxford English Dictionary is "A political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." [ https://www.lexico.com/definition/socialism ] Secondly, Evans gives examples of Hitler trying to Volksgemeinschaft, um, -ise, the means of production, only to come to the conclusion that Hitler wasn't a socialist, because he didn't view class as important. Okay, Hitler wasn't a Marxist. I knew that. You don't necessarily have to be a Marxist to be a socialist. And could you please explain how proving that Hitler was a socialist aids [redacted] denialism? I was under the impression that, if Hitler wasn't a socialist, he couldn't have wanted to socialise the people into a Volksgemeinschaft, the easiest way of doing that being to murder all he deemed unfit. It was hilarious to watch actual Nazis mald that their glorious leader wasn't an economic genius.
    21
  21.  @jrenjrapiro817  Because you are making the claim.
    21
  22.  @jrenjrapiro817  Provide examples then.
    20
  23.  @jrenjrapiro817  Alright, I give up. You aren't going to back up your claims. Would you consider reading "Hitler's Beneficiaries" and "Hitler: Policies of Seduction" as doing my own research then?
    20
  24.  @jrenjrapiro817 >If it were true It is. >Lol you don't follow facts and logic No, it's just that I find a delusional YouTube commenter is far less convincing than a video backed up with sources.
    20
  25.  @fuckfannyfiddlefart  >Pyramid schemes, systematic robbery, extortion rackets, security money, sham unions, cartels, price fixing, drug dealing and sweat shops. No, I'm not talking about the mafia Are you talking about Stalin? >I'm talking about [redacted] German economic practices of the 1930's Oh
    19
  26. Anything to not go back to retail.
    19
  27. @UC98Dr3NADvWVbPRbi4Y4nRw Ah, you are back. How was your trek? Edit: ...
    19
  28.  @jrenjrapiro817  No you didn't. In fact you consider it as me whining, I think along the lines of: "Do my research for me!"
    19
  29.  @Edax_Royeaux  I know, I was just poking fun at how the stock market is apparently socialist.
    18
  30.  @jrenjrapiro817  Answer this question: Would you consider reading books such as "Hitler's Beneficiaries" and "Hitler: Policies of Seduction" as doing my own research? And here's you ranting about me deflecting. Rich.
    18
  31.  @jonathanm9993  David Irving likes Hitler, Mises doesn't like socialism. Not seeing the connection.
    17
  32.  @jrenjrapiro817  "How dare you ask me to back up my claims, and then have the nerve to insult me after I strawman you so hard it isn't even a strawman!" I too am glad that children like you are not writing history books.
    17
  33.  @jrenjrapiro817  Citation(s) needed.
    17
  34.  @jrenjrapiro817  "heard" is a funny way of saying "read".
    17
  35.  @jrenjrapiro817  >lol you have no counter What the hell am I supposed to counter, you rambling on about how I cannot argue? Ironic. Come back when you have 2 copies of chromosome 21.
    17
  36.  mike mcmike  Don't hurt people or take their stuff Yes, very extreme
    16
  37. 11:07 For a minute there I thought you had just said a word that doesn't comply with YouTube's communist guidelines.
    16
  38.  @Caresfree637  Losing trade to the populace you are fighting. Doesn't sound profitable.
    16
  39.  @TheImperatorKnight  it's better than the actual history channel
    16
  40. It means it is based and redpilled
    16
  41.  @Gvjrapiro  He was an MP for Labour, so not exactly whatever a "right-winger" is.
    16
  42.  @jrenjrapiro817  You haven't given me anything better to do.
    16
  43.  BenjaminTheRogue  mkes the ruskis comeback much more impressive.
    16
  44.  @personaa422  Well Nazis did pull a lot of their ideology from socialists so how about that for orgins.
    15
  45.  @timk6181  A polemic against Nazism, yes.
    15
  46.  @matthewbadley5063  Leacing 29 million. I like those odds.
    15
  47. It truly is a complete non sequitur.
    14
  48. If they did they might not be neo-nazis.
    14
  49.  @jrenjrapiro817  k then.
    14
  50. I wonder whether anyone who posts this has ever had a thought of their own
    13