Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1.  @erozionzeall6371 > competitive free market will always lead to a monopoly, either through domination or mergers. Firms must be able to refer to external markets in order to judge their own internal operations. A cartel that encompasses a great majority of firms will thusly be unable to make these judgements and will implode.
    4
  2. How is this far right?
    4
  3. And?
    4
  4.  @florintanase9348  Yes they did. They suspended Article 153, the article guaranteeing private property.
    4
  5.  @florintanase9348  oh no, they didn't buy it. They issued IOU's called MEFO bills to "pay" for armaments. This channel actually recently did a video on MEFO bills, I advise you check it out.
    4
  6.  @florintanase9348  Not saying it was the Reich taking over industry. Just saying that they were IOUs that the government would totally pay
    4
  7. Okay, so someone is only a socialist when they prioritise non-racial groups
    4
  8. Based and livestock farmerpilled
    4
  9.  @professorcranium4792  You mean all the unnecessary regulations General Motors supported for the sole purpose of hurting their competition like Volkswagen?
    4
  10. Of course. Who needs labour unions in a socialist utopia? Oh yeah, and here is what really happened with privatisation: 2:10:18
    3
  11.  @iconsumedmt1350  And Uncle Angus isn't a real Scotsman.
    3
  12.  @thegreathadoken6808  The guy who tried to kill Hitler?
    3
  13. And Lenin was funded by the Kaiser, so I guess that makes him a monarchist.
    3
  14. Taxation is rape
    3
  15.  mike mcmike  You have at most watched just over half an hour of this video. Thanks for proving OP's point, I guess.
    3
  16. 03:52:06
    3
  17.  @attackdog6824  >We(socialists) do not support racial or statist institutions that destroy society, (X) doubt
    3
  18.  @heathenbushcraft2981  I still think the Liberty Bell would have been good.
    3
  19.  @jesseshaver2262  au contraire
    3
  20.  @bennymassimo3195  Neoliberal Maggie Thatcher never touched the NHS...
    3
  21.  @bennymassimo3195  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQJ6Q9vhVYg
    3
  22.  @executivedirector7467  my statement also applies to those who make propositions on their behalf.
    3
  23. Having read his Basic Economics from to back, I can affirm that there is no hymns in it.
    3
  24.  @kimobrien.  He defines economics as the study of the allocation of scarce resources with alternative uses. Could you provide an instance where he cherry picks data?
    3
  25. Roads have to be paid for one way or another. Currently, it is through taxes, but as you said, there are toll roads, there are permits, there are advertising, who knows which ways the market will come up with?
    3
  26.  @dwizzi1724  how is this an axiom, i.e. how does denying that one should have free medical care require that one affirms a person should have free medical care?
    3
  27.  @dwizzi1724  The second one. I should probably clarify by saying that an axiom is a proposition that one must affirm in order to attempt to deny. I am wondering how not wanting free healthcare is denying an axiom.
    3
  28.  @topercaker2646  His most popular video is on why Hitler started WW2.
    3
  29.  @spellman007  no u
    3
  30. 4:08:04
    3
  31.  mike mcmike  Still haven't watched the video and/or specifically the timestamp above? I'll give you a pass since you ignore the South Carolina Declaration of Secession
    3
  32. Sir, this is a video on the crimes of Germans.
    3
  33.  @guerillagardener2237  How does "the British people" get the right to the property of BT?
    3
  34.  @NayyPlayys  That was like one point. And really, does anyone in power intend on giving power up?
    3
  35. Because he was actually a Baptised Lutheran.
    3
  36. Lenin killed socialists too, so I guess he isn't a socialist
    3
  37. Seems like a fairly standard German name
    3
  38.  @Metacomet1678  OK, so they tried to stop socialism in Russia, but that is very different to ACTUALLY stopping them.
    3
  39. How is Marxism evil? The pursuit of it has resulted in evil.
    3
  40.  @angryatheist  depends upon the nationalism. If it is understood to be secessionism then it certainly is in opposition to socialism, but if it attempting to promote national interest over individual interest then it certainly is socialistic.
    3
  41. Unlike Hitler's pacifism, there is both theoretical and practical proof of Hitler's socialism.
    3
  42. He doesn't rationalise Hitler anymore that I rationalise the Thuggee by saying they believed Kali would destroy humanity if they did not commit murder.
    3
  43. Nah, his father and grandfathers were poor industrial workers.
    3
  44. >How can a version of history be both Marxist and Keynesian at the same time? Look to the Labour Party.
    3
  45.  @paidgovernmentshill_6950  Doesn't nessecarily disporve it, but when the source you use is written by someone who doesn't know what privatisation is, you are going to need to find a better source. Failing that, the assertion is unfounded and can be dismissed.
    3
  46. Share, please.
    3
  47. "I am am artist."
    3
  48. So that would make socialism equivalent to theft. The motivation regarding the workers simply being that - a motivation.
    3
  49. Certainly not a John Locke liberal.
    3
  50. And what exactly is wrong with them?
    3