Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "Comparing the ideologies of Hitler, Mussolini and Mosley" video.

In any case, he would have wanted Danzig just for himself, which the Poles were not eager to give up. It doesn't really matter how many time you declare your intention to not go to war with Britain, the fact remains that if you have such a size of territory like a Germany that planned on conquering along with the resources and industrial capacity, you are a huge threat to Britain as you can build a power navy and conquer her. TIK has a few videos on this topic.
3
@SgtVito Ah it's fine, I think Farrell's narrative is that Italy only became involved in the [very naughty event] after the establishment of the Italian Social Republic.
2
TIK, I believe you have erred in your assessment of Mosley as anti-democratic; in his 10 Points of Fascist Policy: Fascism Explained published by Mosley in 1933:- "Fascist Government, however, will at once take power to act by securing from the first Fascist Parliament complete power of action for the Government. Without the power to act and the will to act, nothing can be done. Fascist Government, will use the power given it by the first Fascist Parliament for the reconstruction of the nation. At the end of the first Fascist Parliament, another election will be held, on an occupational and not on a geographical franchise. Men and women will vote within their own industries with a real knowledge of the persons and subjects with which they are dealing. Women who are not in industry will vote as wives and mothers, and will thus be represented for the first time by people competent to speak for the great national interest which they represent." I haven't read Fascism for the Million, maybe the citation you gave completely contradicts my source, but it does seem like an elaborate way to integrate democracy into his system if he truly is an anti-democratic anti-parliamentarian
2
@oscartang4587u3 Okay?
2
@oscartang4587u3 That's great, but I don't see how this has any bearing on what Mosley believed.
2
@oscartang4587u3 Well neither the USSR nor North Korea were/are syndicalist, and to be truthfully honest we can never really know what Mosley would have done had he got into power. However, the evidence of Mosley supporting a parliament, though it was based on syndicates as opposed to geography, and the fact that parliamentarianism had been established in Britain since 1689 leads me to believe that a fascist Britain would still have a parliament.
2
@davehunt2191 TIK does mention that Italy did pass anti-semitic laws like the examples given in the article after 1938 after he had consorted with Hitler. Further, the evidence of by Zimmerman is also consistent with TIK's view that it was only when northern Italy became a German puppet state did they assist in the [very naughty event done by the very naughty man with the famous moustache]. Further, he does cite his material, they are in the reference bar at the bottom of the screen.
1
@davehunt2191 Are you going to actually respond to my counterarguments or make ad hominems based on a shitpost I uploaded nearly 2 years ago?
1
@davehunt2191 Allow me to assure you that I do not have any biases in respect to the Yugoslav Wars, the video I uploaded was a clip poking fun at a politically relevant figure's turn of phrase. Germany and Italy allying also doesn't contradict TIK's narrative, he has a whole other video explaining that.
1
1. They were socialists, they nationalised industry, implemented massive welfare for Germans and any supposed privatisation was in fact reselling businesses to Party members. 2. The fascists did not support racism on philosophical grounds since they were actualists and did not attribute human action to biological causes.
1
When did it begin being used as such?
1
Correct, however Hitler did believe that he would need to destroy the USSR before implementing total socialism:- "For a fight it will have to be, since the first objective will not be to build up the idea of the People's State but rather to wipe out the Jewish State which is now in existence. As so often happens in the course of history, the main difficulty is not to establish a new order of things but to clear the ground for its establishment." This explains the remaining private elements in the Nazi economy. True that names aren't everything, but this doesn't discount the possibility of the Nazis truly being socialist. Goetz Aly has famously argued that the main way Hilter was able to win the support of the German people was through massive welfare programmes. While the Nazis were initially financed by capitalists, this doesn't serve as any more evidence of Hitler's capitalism, as Lenin being funded by the German Empire as evidence of his monarchism. Rather, they made a massive error, and were heavily expropriated or even outright nationalised as in the case of Junker's plane factory. Do watch his videos for more details.
1
@oscartang4587u3 I really don't know what point you are trying to make with the constant references to North Korea and the USSR. Further, it isn't really subversion of the contemporary parliamentary democracy as it is more a redefining of constituencies from a geographical to an industrial one.
1
@oscartang4587u3 But you still need to prove that Mosley would not have allowed the vote, which would involve going against all the evidence. Further, no-one is claiming Mosley wanted a liberal democracy.
1
@oscartang4587u3 But everything is still ultimately centrally planned by the State; Mosley advises that specific industries should be centrally planned by the workers at large through voting. Thus Mosley's fascism is not alike North Korean democracy. Well, Mosley's democracy is more liberal than illiberal, especially when compared to Nazi and Italian "democracy". Not saying he is pro-democratic in the popular sense, all I am saying is that he deserves an asterisk.
1
I suppose Marxism isn't socialism either because Marxists fought other socialists too. The actual term used was gleichschaltung which translates to synchronisation.
1
@carlosgolivas then why don't we admit Nazism or Fascism as species of this genus?
1