Comments by "The french are harlequins" (@thefrenchareharlequins2743) on "" video.

The argument against hierarchies would make sense in a legalistic sense where rank 1 is allowed to aggress on rank 2. But most ancoms seem to think mutually profitable exchanges are aggression by one of the parties, rendering their arguments flawed.
21
@colorpg152 Yes - I acquire food on the condition that I perform labour for him
14
@colorpg152 You can't just say you own the moon by pointing at it.
12
@colorpg152 both parties profit i.e. satisfy unease from the exchange i.e. a mutual title transfer
8
@colorpg152 the fact that it is in the atmosphere implies it is unowned, so the person would not own it
8
@colorpg152 initiation of conflict
7
@efw-vz4hc non-aggression
2
@colorpg152 false, communism favours aggressors when resolving conflicts, therefore it opposes contract and therefore exchange is not a communist activity.
1