Youtube hearted comments of jim oberg (@jimoberg3326).

  1. Many comments here follow the thesis of Lesli Kean that pilots are 'trained observers' and collect very accurate and reliable descriptions of anomalies. But maybe that's naïve. Several years ago, I described the ‘questionable foundation’ of Leslie Kean’s book as the naïve and unverified faith in pilot reports. She has insisted the UFOs show intelligent purpose based on the nature of their witnesses, since they behave differently when seen by military pilots than when seen by civilian pilots [when the more common-sense explanation is that different pilots report observations in terms of what they expect from their own different experience bases]. The data archives she touts as ‘unexplainable’ pilot sightings [such as the French ‘Weinstein Report’] can easily be shown to contain numerous pilot misinterpretations of unrecognized space and missile activity around the world, so who knows how many other prosaic explanations were never found by the ‘investigators’? See here: https://web.archive.org/web/20190101223008/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/38852385
    2