Comments by "broadbandislife" (@broadbandislife) on "Latest Sightings" channel.

  1. 94
  2. 72
  3. 40
  4. 38
  5. 34
  6. 30
  7. 28
  8. 23
  9. 22
  10. 17
  11. 16
  12. 15
  13. 13
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 12
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 10
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 7
  30. 7
  31. 7
  32. 7
  33. 7
  34. 6
  35. 6
  36. 6
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. 4
  53. 4
  54. 4
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278.  @definitelynotatroll246  It was more a case of "nonchalant hyena sharing its prey with a very confused and jittery leopard". The video is somewhere on this channel IIRC but in brief the scenario was largely the same as here - a hyena turning up while the leopard was in the process of subduing a warthog (more like tearing its chest open but anyway). The big cat got distracted enough by the new arrival that the hog was able to break loose and tried to run away (with its guts hanging out) only to get promptly caught and finished off by the hyena, which duly set down to eat. The leopard was apparently kinda winded from its struggle with the piggy because it hung back for some time and then started sneaking up on the hyena from behind, no doubt intent on recovering its lunch. When it was maybe 5-10 meters away the hyena just looked at it over its shoulder with an air of "goofy pls" and calmly moved to the other side of the carcass so the 'pard could also come eat. Which it cautiously did, with palpable air of bewilderment and nervousness which is unsurprising given they're not exactly used to eating in company to begin with and, y'know, rival predators and all, and every now and then started snarling and baring its teeth at the hyena. Which just calmly ignored such bristling altogether. On a similar vein I've seen a case where a hyena and a trio of Cape dogs, both foraging away from their respective groups, joined forces to catch an antelope and casually shared the meal. Later members of both packs started arriving to the scene and the usual food fight ensued, but by that point the initial hyena had already eaten its fill and calmly went off to the side to pretty much take a nap. These guys are amazingly brazen but then you don't regularly square off against lions without some big brass ones so yeah.
    1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463.  @samo6083  I do read all your posts FYI, painful though it is. I just don't bother with the irrelevant fanboy bits and meaningless wild claims argued out of patent ignorance. By the by I'd like some sources for your earlier claim about the doges having similar food intake requirements as the lions that are about six times their mass (and the males several multipliers more). That'd make lions some astonishingly energy-efficient critters indeed, square-cube "economies of scale" or no... The actual reason as you'd know if you in fact understood anything about carnivore ecological strategies, and why your fanboi harping about "rates" is utterly irrelevant horseshit, is because the numbers aren't comparable in the first place. The dogs are "pursuit" or "chase" predators, as the social canids are wont to be; their main gig is investing substantial time, effort and energy into seeing through a comparatively small number of sustained hunts with due high rates of success. The risk with this strategy is if they're left without meal anyway for whatever reason (prey escapes, another predator nabs it as here, the kill gets pirated etc.) then all that time and energy spent goes right down the drain - "all eggs in one basket" as it were. Lions, like all cats, have a different strategy - the "ambush" or "pouncing" approach. They make comparatively many short, intense efforts but quickly drop unpromising hunts to cut their losses (and for that matter lack the baseline stamina to sustain extended, persistent chases). This naturally results in low average success rate but also spreads out the risks - it's no big loss if any single hunt fails to produce results. (Unless you're a cheetah anyway, but those kitties have over-specialised in a particularly strenuous variant.) As the bar of entry for the latter strategy is low and doesn't require particularly demanding or convoluted evolutionary adaptations it's something a lot of carnivores and omnivores at least dabble in opportunistically to supplement their primary strategies, "pursuit" hunters included. Remember this bit from the article I pasted earlier? "An analysis of 1,119 chases by a pack of six Okavango wild dogs showed that most were short distance uncoordinated chases, and the individual kill rate was only 15.5 percent." That's them engaging in exactly this kind of target-of-opportunity low-investment hunting. (The 2016 study, linked in the citation reference and available online, notes this appeared to be connected to the present range of that pack having been a mixed woodland environment.) And this is why your waving about your tendentiously ill-understood success rates is meaningless. You're comparing apples and oranges and thinking both are fucking lemons to boot.
    1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1