Comments by "AndyT" (@T5Zplayer) on "'I've never called anyone SCUM' | Fiery war of words ensues at PMQs over anti-social behaviour plans" video.

  1. Rayner at her most hysterical. Airhead.
    11
  2.  @Bobisalive  Abusive, aggressive, dishonest, unintelligent, clueless.
    11
  3.  @Bobisalive  This makes no sense
    2
  4. Makes no sense
    1
  5. You wish
    1
  6.  @Nonegiven14582  Suggest you check out 2005, project sapphire and why convictions were falling Then ask why Starmer as head of CPS changes the way statistics were drawn to oppose the finding of the Ministry of Justice.
    1
  7.  @Nonegiven14582  Try and take a step back and be objective. 1. Rape cases convictions have nothing to do with police numbers, its about evidence. Under Blair the prosecution and conviction rate was just as poor. Check Project Saphire. 2 Starmer when at the CPS changed the way stats were collected to give a different finding to those published by the Min of Justice. 3. Evidence based prosecutions cannot give a sentence based on hearsay 4. Labour could put 10,000 extra police on the streets tomorrow. Would it make any difference? If you wanted 24hr police on the streeets in all towns and cities Labour would need to find 250000 more police. 5. You cannot gloss over the serious financial situation the Tories took over, Fact. 6. Rayner knows she would hve no impact on the issues even if she was in power tomorrow. The only was to fund all the things she supports would be to raise taxes on all. Remember Labour use to tax the poor at 33%
    1
  8.  @Nonegiven14582  Yet Labour introduced a parole that guaranteed rapists serving 50% of time. When the Tories bill last year wanted to stop that Labour voted against. An then 40 odd helped block the deportation of a murderer who went on to kill again
    1