Comments by "Варяжский вопрос" (@normanism) on "Styrman" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. @ nobody knows how thise nomads called themselves Everyone know them only under some Rus-like name so there is no way they called themselves some other way. Ruses is the name of slavs that lived in Rus People lived around Kiev called themselves "Polyane", nobody knew the word Rus unless vikings came. they got to dnipro river because of north to south trade route The route from North to South never existed. All the earlier activity of Rus'es was about the route from Baltic to Volga. In the first written source mentioning Rus'es (rhos) under 839 they called their leader a "khagan" apparently referring a Khazarian khagan. not a single word said about this settlement as the administrative center As I said there are 2 markers: fortress and the elite antiques which allow us to assume such an interpretation. Nosov also wrote that Gorodishe with its amount of Scandinavian antiques aims Birka and Hedeby. And by the way, accordingly Ukrainian archeologist A.Komar, Kiev did not have signs of an administrative centre unless the "town of Vladimir" was built. it was not a capital I didn't say it was a capital, I used the words town and administrative centre. there was ALREADY a non tribal kingsdom Nothing shows that Eastern Slavs had any signs of elite in the 9th century. dont be ashamed, ussr made up history ti appel the moscow is kind of a fairy tale In USSR they stated that Kiev was 1500-years old and considered Polanians as real Ruses fighting with the "Western influence". So you best blow off the dust from Soviet books and pray on them. As you can see from this video in Western schools Ruses are Vikings and Swedes so there is no way somebody believes they were "Ukrainians".
    2
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1