Comments by "Danuta Hanyga" (@danutahanyga4834) on "Jesús Enrique Rosas"
channel.
-
31
-
28
-
26
-
18
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
@dvjfredmerc529
It's not really that complex. No software required. An average person with a reasonable education and the ability to think can estimate the consequences of our behaviour. You've worked it out; increased density of population, increased travel = increased transmission. There are already documented cases of disease transmission from animal to human and a number of known diseases that one can catch from domestic animals, add to this human expansion onto wildlife habitat, keeping and breeding wild animals then trading them for profit, and bingo. We have the perfect breeding ground for a cocktail of new diseases we will need to get acquainted with. Then, as bugs cross the species, they mutate to adapt to new hosts.
Unfortunately, 70-80% of people are mindless, entitled and unable to foresee the consequences of their behaviour, and cannot see what's coming. Google experimented with quantum computer and the outcome of their experiment was so scary, google decided not to continue. Especially that it doesn't matter anymore. It's done. Our self made fate appears to be sealed.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@martinharris5017
If you had vision, focus and drive to achieve something that benefits people arounf the globe, you's also have money and your name would be a household name, like Bill Gates's. The truth is it isn't.. Many years ago, Bill Gates saw a computer in every household. The rest of computer community sai "rubbish'. It's Bill Gates vision that became reality. Despite his detractors and neysayers.
What philosophy are you talking about. Bill Gates uses computers like everybody else does. He made his money not from using computers but from creating software, being better than very good at it, then creating the entire corporation which employs talented people who create more products.
Originally, wayh back when he was starting out, his philosophy was that he'd rather make 1% of 100 products, than applying 100 % markup on one product. Hard to argue with this: more people can afford to buy, and he makes more money. The philosophy that too many others have and it doesn't take them very far.
2
-
2
-
@LilFisch1174
Rubbish! Bill Gates does have any vaccine production facility. How can he then produce vaccines? Bill Gates cannot test vaccines or any other medications, either. There is a protocol for it. The research is often done by universities, but mostly by pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical companies test vaccines in clinical trials. Bill Gates Foundation donated funds to Oxford Uni for research into Covid19 vax in cooperation with AstraZeneca pharma. The research and clinical trials were botched. The less than desirable standard of clinical trials is 100% the responsibility of AstraZeneca.
If you have any problems here, you need to determine which pharma produced the offensive vaccine you claim is killing children.
One of the most problematic pharmaceutical companies is Pfizer. Pfizer paid the highest to date fine for fudging data and deceiving US Government. Pfizer is NOT Bill Gates, in fact, Pfizer has nothing to do with Bill Gates. He may own some shares but a lot of people do.
What is on public record, though, is that US and UK governments did medical tests on their own population, without informed consent, and on other, vulnerable nations. Again Bill Gates has nothing to do with it. In fact, at the time the unlawful tests first came to light, Bill Gates was a young child. You're barking up the wrong tree.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@caiusmadison2996
One more thing: free education and healthcare are NOT considered welfare in healthy societies. Every person deserves a decent standard of living, good free education, and healthcare. In equitable societies, everyone is better off: there is less violence, less crime and people contribute to the betterment of their country. In contrast, the US has the highest incarceration rate per capita. The US has the elite, celebrities, and an underclass of deplorables. Ever-growing too. And it's the US that preaches to others about human rights while violating these rights, openly, secretly, and by deception on a regular basis.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lemonsunshine947
Blah, blah, blah. Responsibility is" a matter of opinion", my ass. You can't be serious. You bring children into the world, you are responsible for them, or ought to be just like YOU have responsibility for YOUR own actions and your behaviour. Believing otherwise is a copout and counting on others to pick up the slack. How convenient! Why should they?
I understand the sterilization, you're so bitter about, waa free and the women already had at least one child.
As it stands even today, women in US still have no freedom to choose. Some don't even think of consequences and that having a child is a BIG responsibility. One needs to have time for them, you need to have the means to provide them with a decent childhood so that they don't join the ever increasing, in the US, army of deplorables. That's the term applied to the excess population in the US. Not so long ago, Brazillian police were shooting feral children. This caused understandable outrage around the world. But where did all those feral children come from? Whose responsibility were they? Why were they out in the streets?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@woIfson
And why would I do that? I never said the vaccines are properly trialed, merely that all you guys here are barking up the wrong tree. It's the big pharma and your governments in collusion. Nothing to do with Bill Gates, Einsteins. Bill Gates is not involved in research or production of vaccines. He can have an opinion, though.
Pfizer is in bad need of money as it has just under 5 billion in fines currently PAYABLE. And the problems are mounting as Pfizer was caught experimenting on African people, The new lawsuit is in pipeline and penalty will be steep. How come no one here knows that?
The great unwashed masses, nincompoops, and conspiracy theorists confuse Gates Foundation with Pfizer. Two SEPARATE entities independent of each other. The only thing they have in common is their presence in Africa and that's precisely where similarity ends.
The largest fine in history was slapped on Pfizer by US authorities for deceiving the government and fudging data. No one here knows about this fact, either. Is it a surprise then that the Pfizer vaccine is pushed on people? Now US government needs to ensure Pfizer has money to pay the fine, and survive. Someone has to donate their arms to the cause and this is the unsuspecting expendable public. People with money know where to get vaccinated. Safely.
You, the grey masses are just being used as easy prey. Especially that you have no recourse. There is a safe and effective vaccine available, used by 67 countries worldwide. This information is hidden from you, and from me but I know where to find it. All the while you guys are busy fighting windmills, chasing shadows instead of looking for information. It's easily found.
A petition, well written by someone well versed in the law was already presented to New Zealand Government demanding answers within the statutory time limit and regarding a long list of verifiable concerns around mRNA vaccines. I can't wait. This is the way to go.
I am not sure what sort of rights citizens have in the US. The judicial system looks shady to me
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@teresitapasalo4795
Yes, it is and has been for decades at least.
Ukraine, the part that historians call Ukraine Proper with the capital Lvov, was a Polish territory from 1630 to 1945. After the peace settlement, Poland lost the territory to the USSR, and most Polish people were repatriated. They had horror stories of persecution by the Ukrainian minority in their own country. I was told stories of Ukrainians tearing a non-Ukrainian baby apart with their bare hands. Babies were christened under the cover of night. Otherwise, the christening party, including the priest and the baby could face a lethal attack by Ukrainians. t I found it difficult to believe but could not have an informed opinion either way. Late last year, the Australian ABC news channel showed footage from the 1941 massacres of people in Lvov by the Ukrainian Waffen SS and civilian enthusiasts. This was horrendous. These people were butchered in horrific ways. The entire families were dragged to the forest and buried alive. I now believe that the repatriated Poles were telling the truth. Then there were the Volhynia massacres of defenceless Polish farming communities. The tools used were axes, pitchforks, saws and scythes. Scott Ritter said that Ukrainians were cutting catholic priests with saws before the altars.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dylanjarnagin Incorrect. You only have a quarter of the information at best. Any research facility, university, in particular, receives some funding from the government plus funding from foundations and private individuals. Bill Gates did not fund "IT" he provided some of the funds required for equipment, materials, the scientists, the maintenance of the facility. This is what funding means and it ends here. Funding providers, government included do not require details about how the funds were spent or what materials/ingredients were purchased. The professionals engaged/employed make decisions and disburse funds. Those who provide funding, and those who do the work on it have no way of knowing if the project will be successful.
Queensland lab in Australia received funding to develop a Covid19 vaccine. It hasn't worked out and trials were abandoned. Meantime money was needed and used to pay salaries, purchase equipment, products etc. Without the funding, the project wouldn't get started. Funding allows for the development of projects. That's all
1
-
1
-
@dylanjarnagin
Correct. They donate money to the causes close to their heart or interest. Be it cancer research (Cancer Foundation); Baker Institute - Heart research, or public health (vaccines).
Foundations are funds raising vehicles to which the public and institutions can make tax-deductible donations. Think of a cause and you'll find a foundation for it. Nobel Prize is a foundation. Donations need to be invested otherwise foundation will run out of money.
Research facilities are strictly regulated establishments, private or public companies, and not playgrounds for donors who'd want to play out their fantasies. It doesn't matter how much money they have and donate. Here are basic ins and outs of how things work: the looong part. Read or leave it
Entry to the research sections is restricted to the authorized staff. So no, one cannot just come in and play with the ingredients, or even request particular ingredients to be incorporated. You can develop a product and have it manufactured at a lab according to your specifications. It applies to cosmetics and health supplements but EXCLUDES anything used for public health purposes. Anything that is ingested or injected has to be meticulously developed, tested, and manufactured in a licensed facility.
No one but authorized personnel are allowed to be present in a lab or on the production line which is fully automated these days. In medical research and production, the already stringent protocol is stepped up and often requires premisses with positive air pressure inside to stop any contaminants coming in from outside. research on viruses and vaccines in particular, with staff needing to decontaminate before they enter and before they leave the lab. Detailed records are maintained. Research scientists answer to the director of this particular research. Personnel and its movement are kept to a minimum.
Donations are tax-deductible, so instead of giving money to the government to be wasted on wars, in the case of US, you give to the causes you want to support. Research institutes need to do their accounting and be transparent. Those who donate money may wish to see how their money was spent ie the books. If they really want to they can access datils of the research in scientific journals. Research details are tedious unless of course development of vector vaccines is your burning passion.
Unfortunately, those who pay for research on occasion want an outcome to suit their interest hence science can be tainted. Still, as a donor to medical research, you cannot make requests other than a good product. If you invest in a pharmaceutical company, you want returns, so one cares about profitable and safe-to-use products (no one wants costly lawsuits).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1