Comments by "Zudabaker" (@Vyrus36) on "Brian Tyler Cohen"
channel.
-
50
-
36
-
28
-
23
-
19
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@toughgiraffe5865 you mean you don't know? Are you living under a rock? Or do you just unironically believe they where true?
We have Jewish space lasers, lizard people, aliens, china, Russia, antifa did it, witch hunt, false flag, election theft and more, most of which contradict one another, and none of which have any credible evidence.
Plus, Trump is now a known traitor, because we know he tried to snatch the election back.
Now's when you fervantly deny it all, call it fake news, or try to insult me instead of putting up anything resembling an argument.
Here let me start for you, "but (insert "the Dems" Oboma, Clinton, or Biden here) was worser!"
You're not only a liar, but you're also predictable.
😘
3
-
@toughgiraffe5865 let me help you then. :)
"Step forward: we hear
That you are a good man.
You cannot be bought, but the lightning
Which strikes the house, also
Cannot be bought.
You hold to what you said.
But what did you say?
You are honest, you say your opinion.
Which opinion?
You are brave.
Against whom?
You are wise.
For whom?
You do not consider your personal advantages.
Whose advantages do you consider then?
You are a good friend.
Are you also a good friend of the good people?
Hear us then: we know.
You are our enemy. This is why we shall
Now put you in front of a wall. But in consideration of your merits and good qualities
We shall put you in front of a good wall and shoot you
With a good bullet from a good gun and bury you
With a good shovel in the good earth."
It's entitled, "interigation of the good" and at the end, the speaker is shot.
The person's face, is a combination of world leaders, (meant to trigger those who have a bias one way or another).
It is a question, for those who self proclaim as "good" or being "better than".
"Are you also a good friend, to the good people?"
Do you take sides? Do you just hear what you need to to justify your feelings? Or are you actually unbiased and support who is good and right regardless??
"You say your opinion, what opinion?"
"You are brave, against whom?"
"You are wise, for whom?"
Who are you being brave against? Who is it you are being wise for?
Do you know? Or is it just a fantasy in your mind, because thinking about the full truth is difficult?
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@doccarter5283 you obviously have never heard of exceptions to that rule.
It's called "argument from fallacy" or "argumentum ad fallacy" or " the bad reasons fallacy" or (as I like to call it) the boy who cried wolf fallacy.
It states, that just because a fallacy exists within an argument, that it does not automatically invalidate the conclusion. It just makes that point invalid.
In matters of showing motivation, character can be brought into question. This happens all the time, in the court of law.
I'd follow your own advice, and stop with that strategy, it was dead before you started. I know, that I know more about logic than you, because you jumped to the lowest tier of argument, unironically, which is, the argument from fallacy.
You're move boy who cried fallacy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 if the shoe fits, again you take the high road, I'll take the low road, and I'll get to Scotland before you.
The only argument you have left, is one from this psuedo moral position, where name calling is somehow insufferable.
In case of character, it can, and does get used against you in debate all the time.
If you backpedal on your words, if you can't follow through with your points after being asked direct questions, then you are, in fact, a fizzle.
Don't like that? Then stop being so much of a fizzle.
One of the things I can't stand is when pseudo intellectuals like you try to purport that ad hominem attacks automatically invalidate the person who's speaking.
The only thing that it does is make that particular point invalid.
And in cases of calling character into question it is valid.
Because if you can be shown to be unreliable when defending your stance then I have every right to call that out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 why can't you answer a simple question without using loaded questions?
I don't hate you, but I think your argument is poorly thought out, and I don't think you've actually thought this through as far as you think you have.
The fact you can't answer the obvious question, and instead have to ask your own loaded questions, just tells me that it makes you uncomfortable.
So, for the last time, do, you, speak, for, those, people?
Stop dodging, and answer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 no, you didn't, and what goes unsaid, actually says alot in debate.
You could have acknowledged that we can make things better, but you didn't.
You could have talked about the necessity of voter expansion, but you didn't.
Instead, you tried to drive home the talking point, that some people don't actually have it that bad, and when asked to elaborate on it, I got crickets and diversions.
I honestly hope I do, Im going to school for philosophy and psychology. I hope to enter accidemic debates and make a difference.
Yet another bluff bites the dust huh?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Fake Theory you don't care about people being called idiots for not taking the virus seriously.
No, what really bothers you is questioning your own intelligence as a result.
So rather than promote corrections to information, and being a cause for enlightenment, and safety.
You'd rather take that information and use it to help people feel better about doing nothing, or being anti mask or anti vax?
Let me get this straight, you know the truth and are using it to make people feel okay about doing the wrong thing or nothing at all? Your taking the truth about masks and using it as a talking point against covid restrictions instead of educating people on what kind of mask to use?
Like, you understand this, and you understand what the virus is doing, and you could be telling people to use better masks, but instead your saying, "they told us to use the wrong ones better give up?"
Is that it? Do you yourself wear a mask or do you not consider it worth it even though you know exactly what kind you'd need to keep yourself and your family safe?
What a waste of intelligence.
2
-
@whatsthebigfndeal your simple.
You're a fake, and a coward, and I can prove it.
You don't distrust the government like you say, you only distrust Democrats.
You can't make an argument outside of projection and ad hominem because your inept in an argument.
You brought up dunning Kruger then hilariously showed blatant ignorance to how our voting works.
Once backed into a corner, you lashed out and called everyone else the problem. Is that really so or did you simply run out of credible things to say?
"Step forward, we hear that you are a good man
You stand by what you said, but what did you say?
You say you can't be bought, but the lighting, which strikes us down, also cannot be bought.
You do not consider your advantages? Who's advantages do you consider then?
You are a "good" friend, are you also a good friend of the good people?
Hear us then, we know you are our enime. That is why we shall now put you in front of a wall.
But in consideration of your good qualities, we will put you in front of a good wall, shoot you with a good gun, and burry you, in the good earth."
-interigation of the good Bertolt Bretch.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@toughgiraffe5865 yeah I know one side keeps wanting everyone to put all of their faith into Trump and his policies and the other one is wanting people to consider a multitude of different people's views, their plights, and challenges. Weird huh?
So, you tell me, who has only one platform they are running on and says "trust me because reasons!"
Who's the one who keeps getting laughed out of court rooms for not having evidence?
Man, you walked right into the point and still missed it.
And you're right, there is no hope for you, if you only believe in the Republicans.
But you know, you can always continue to assume my political affiliation and ideologies.
Yes, the media is corrupt, all of it, not just the parts that slam Trump like you think.
Also, we have logical tools, like Occam's razor, and things like reasoning, and accreditation, to help determine a good source from a bad source.
Morons like you cherry pick info based on where it came from, and not how the information was put together.
🤣🤣🤣
You definitely are lost, nice projection my man. 🤣🤣🤣
I mean, the media is a one sided juggernaut that hates Republicans. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Get a grip.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@2Sinamin that's completely accurate. They are victims of the dunning Kruger effect.
It's kinda counter intuitive but basically, if you believe you can be susceptible to it, you're more likely to acknowledge when you lack information, are better at educating yourself, are more open minded, and more receptive to new information.
If you believe you are immune to it, well, then you're ignorance probably outweighs your intelligence and you're not aware and probably will never be unless something happens that forces you to shuffle around your thoughts.
If you believe you are immune to ignorance, then you probably are ignorant and will remain so.
If you believe you can be ignorant of topics, then you're more likely to learn, and acknowledge where you lack information so you can learn.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lronhoover7637 that's a YouTube video...
Haha. "I don't have YouTube sources!" *Puts up video from YouTube."
Yes, a cited source can technically be anything but accredited sources are specific.
Do you believe any citation is credible?
Also, you have yet to inform me of the accredited video, journal, speech, paper, or article you extracted this info from.
So, no, you didn't cite anything.
As a matter of fact, I think you are presenting someone else's research/theory as your own, and are afraid to expose that fact.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UCm4feOcWJOMGpIp_lLNY-fA yes, I'm aware of the potential that it was a lab release.
However, without sufficient evidence, we have to apply logical tools like Occam's razor and remove assumptions from the evidence.
So, yes, it's definitely a possibility that it came from the lab in Wuhan, and was released intentionally.
A very good possibility, and would open a whole line of questioning IF proven.
And, if and when it is proven, I'll be one of the first to conclude that all those accountable must be dealt with swiftly.
But until then, it's all speculation on the specifics, and as a rational human, I must reserve judgement until the facts are in.
But don't worry, I know you won't be able to stop yourself from saying, "told ya so" if future evidence reveals it to be the case. 😘
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lronhoover7637 and for all of corporate media's follies, Trump's deal with China, and his wanting to shut down the CDC, and him telling Fauci to remain silent, has gone relatively unreported by corporate media.
Sure they glossed over it because it's a jab at the guy, but they didn't double down on reporting it like they do to call out his derogatory remarks, the inserection, fraud, Russia, or lying about the pandemic, or any of those things.
If anything, I bring those points up because they seem to not be a target by corporate media, and have more or less been glossed over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The end is near ...Your astronomical conceit
Of bulk and power is anserine.
Your ignorance so thick,
You did not know your own arithmetic.
We flung the graphs about your flying feet;
We measured your diameter —
Merely a line
Of zeros prefaced by an integer.
Before we came
You had no name.
You did not know direction or your pace;
We taught you all you ever knew
Of motion, time and space.
We healed you of your vertigo
And put you in our kindergarten show,
Perambulated you through prisms, drew
Your mileage through the Milky Way,
Lassoed your comets when they ran astray,
Yoked Leo, Taurus, and your team of Bears
To pull our kiddy cars of inverse squares.
'Boast not about your harmony,
Your perfect curves, your rings
Of pure and endless light — 'Twas we
Who pinned upon your seraphim their wings,
And when your brassy heavens rang
With joy that morning while the planets sang
Their choruses of archangelic lore,
'Twas we who ordered the notes upon their score
Out of our winds and strings.
Yes! all your shapely forms
Are ours — parabolas of silver light,
Those blueprints of your spiral stairs
From nadir depth to zenith height,
Coronas, rainbows after storms,
Auroras on your eastern tapestries
And constellations over western seas....
Just part of "the truant" by ej Pratt.
Tell whoever you "spoke" with I'll be waiting. And I know their secret. 😘
https://canpoetry.library.utoronto.ca/pratt/poem3.htm
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@boblewis7145 in Utah the only people who cast dead votes where for Republicans.
Oklahoma isn't the problem. The problem is that Republican states that expanded their voting rights are few and far between, a majority of them, still have passed laws further restricting rights.
No one brought up Oklahoma, you did, almost as a way of saying, "not all republican states".
Yes, there are exceptions to the general rule, because that's what makes it a general rule.
It would be impressive if other states learned from Oklahoma's, and other states examples, but they aren't now are they?
Sounds like, Oklahomans have a reason to hold other Republican states accountable for making them look bad, dispite their efforts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fake Theory you don't really care about people being called names.
You say you do because it feels like taking the high road after being called out for calling people you never met hateful.
As for dehumanizing fellow Americans, people have done far worse to one another over far less. You don't care so much about that as you care the people being poked fun at happen to align with your ideologies.
But, if I may, let's say you are right and people are purposefully misleading one another.
Wouldn't the responsible thing to do, if you had the correct information, to share that information? How selfish do you have to be to have all of the answers, then sit back and smirk saying "told ya so."
Like, if you understand what is proper to do, why sit on your hands and turn up the beast pretending doing nothing in the face of misinformation is the right answer?
Because, again, using Occam's razor, our best answers seem to be leaning towards effort, not stagnation. So if what is considered to be the best course of action (which is appropriately fitting masks, vaccines, and social distancing.) Is being denied as helpful, then surely you have a better and safer alternative?
Come on now, don't tell me you have all the answers and have been holding out on the world this whole time?
Let me guess, because ideas have people, people don't have ideas? Does that mean you're ideas are not your own and you are incapable of coming up with a unique thought too?
I play dumb, but I understand what it means, it means someone of importance and persuasion gives an idea force. But I digress, what is your alternative solution and what is its documented effectiveness?
Is it to do nothing and let herd immunity take over? Because we've seen the results of that in other nations.
So, please, if you are so informed, and have the best answer for us, can you start a movement and become a leader for the people? Or are you waiting for someone with more charisma than yourself to Cary that torch of insight?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Tick421 anything that's truth, has proof, that's not me just saying it, it's just the way it is.
I can give you dozens of examples of her directly responding to questions.
If you can't even bring one example up, why should anyone listen to your opinion?
Sure, you are entitled to your opinion, but I don't have to politely agree to disagree, if you can't even take the first step in defending it.
You don't automatically start with that level of respect, you haven't earned it.
If you want me or anyone else to take your "opinion" earnestly, you need to be able to back it up. Otherwise, it's just meaningless words.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1