Comments by "Zudabaker" (@Vyrus36) on "Late Night with Seth Meyers"
channel.
-
8
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shaun5328 1. You defended trump by saying he didn't do anything wrong to win his election just because they could not pin him specifically with charges.
2. blm was made to look bad by anarchist extremists, and alt right goons who wanted to take advantage of the chaos. We know the names of the boogaloo bois, and proud boys who escalated events in Portland and Minnesota.
3. No, put together a timeline, stop trying to play this what came first the chicken or the egg game with me when we know what dates actions where taking place.
4. Ukraine has been seeking NATO membership ever since 2014 when we supported them then under Bush Jr.
5. There you go, you have a superficial standard for success.
6. America has the KKK and neo Nazis supporting Trump and Russia currently along with alt right extremists. That is one branch of volunteers, and it has 10-20 percent reported Nazi involvement. And yes, I do see a problem with that, which is why I stated very clearly that their government needs to eradicate Nazi membership and involvement in their military. Any percentage of Nazis in your army is too many. Stop using emotionally driven talking points.
7. It appears I'm just talking to a indipendant sellout who pretends to distrust the government, and pretends to be paranoid against a new world order, but then once another country starts invading others under a dictators rule, starts acting like it's justified, because they just don't trust anything except numbers. 🙄 Do you know what centrist sway is?
8. You've been ignoring over half the points I make, and continue to post over them acting like you're opinions are facts. I'm beginning to think you just don't have a good grasp of history or logic.
9. Because you don't seem to understand why I'd think that. I've ran into some neutral contenders that just don't want US involvement. And I agree with that. But you, you unironically support their invasion. You're a charlatan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shaun5328 🤣🤣🤣🤣 the definitive cause of that fire has never been proven.
The lead experts attribute it to a spark or cigarette ash, because journalists and scientists know how to use logic, and apply aspects like Occam's razor. Something I mentioned earlier that I'm willing to bet you still don't understand.
Occam's razor states, that the best answer often has the fewest assumptions given the evidence. That doesn't mean it can't be wrong still, it just means it's the most logical conclusion given the evidence.
That's the difference between French media, and America's media.
The French wait until the facts are in before pointing blame.
American media jumps to conclusions and scapegoats.
In France Notre Dame burning was quickly reported as an accident as soon as evidence pointed that direction.
In America, they assume negative intent, then even after finding inconclusive, or 0 evidence supporting that intent, they begin to speculate and hypothesize to try and pretend they where right all along!
America reports news to try and save face, then throws it's own citizens under the bus.
The French report facts, and try there best to not let personal opinions influence there journalism.
So, why don't you tell me again how riots don't work?
Tell me you've never studied history without telling me you've never studied history?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1