Comments by "Zudabaker" (@Vyrus36) on "Upper Echelon" channel.

  1. There ya go. That's the phrase she destroyed. Not the entire "me too" movement. If anything, it just got expanded to men and women. Believe all victims. Be they men or women. But don't be afraid to question the evidence.
    5
  2. There ya go. That's the phrase she destroyed. Not the entire "me too" movement. If anything, it just got expanded to men and women. Believe all victims. Be they men or women. But don't be afraid to question the evidence.
    3
  3.  @rp1ten  what? No. Haha, we're finding out who was trying to take advantage of those movements.
    1
  4. She didn't destroy the "me too" movement. She just challenges the belief that we should believe all women and set a standard for what we should be looking for in these cases. Like Jonny Depp's attorney said "this is me too, without the 'me too'" After this case, we can validate, or invalidate a woman's claim, if she doesn't have any real evidence, by showing if there was a pattern of abuse that took place prior. Like, am I the only one here noticing the difference between this case and Kavenaugh? Amber heard came forward with no credible evidence, a shakey story, and no one came forward saying "I too was abused by Jonny Depp." Get real dude. This one case is, what we call in statistics, an isolated incident that helps us understand the rules. Believe all victims, but don't be afraid to question the evidence.
    1