Comments by "Zudabaker" (@Vyrus36) on "Rebel HQ"
channel.
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@GershomSeventyEight because officers are supposed to give citizens the benifit of the doubt unless they have an obvious reason to stop someone.
If he was unloading a mattress, or a couch, then yes, you'd probably have a point. Or if someone had phoned in with a man matching his description continually illegally dumping you'd have a point.
But it's just not an officers job to hassle citizens over minor infractions. If it was, we'd see a lot more jaywalking tickets than we currently do. Minor crimes, usually have to be blatant and disruptive, other wise officers are supposed to give you the benifit of the doubt.
You know, assume innocence unless you have a suspicion of guilt?
So, what was so out of the ordinary that the suspicion of guilt arose?
What could have possibly had these cops, who would otherwise just let someone be and drive by, stop this man?
It doesn't seem like a grandiose display of illegal dumping that would require police involvement now does it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1