General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Zudabaker
The Daily Show
comments

Comments by "Zudabaker" (@Vyrus36) on "The Daily Show" channel.

@guacamolekid3899 he lowered taxes for who? Everyone? Because I owed more in taxes after his policies went into place. Some of those Russian charges brought up incredibly suspicious activity that we all should be concerned about, even though there where no charges on Trump himself, his staff still had significant criminal charges placed against them. Stop being disengenuous.
8
@guacamolekid3899 he didn't make us energy independent. He put the us back into the coal and oil age while the rest of the world is moving away from it. We are starting to loose our relavence in that regard, because sustainable energy plans are becoming the way of the future.
6
@MrFlatage so it's counseling you need I take it?
6
@guacamolekid3899 who was set up? Because in the criminal world, the person who sets up the fall guy is the mob boss to protect himself. You're not helping your argument. And with trumps record for turning his back to people who oppose him and using anyone he can to get his way, I wouldn't put it past him.
5
@guacamolekid3899 unemployment came at the cost of homelessness. Of course unemployment went down. He made it harder to get on.
4
@guacamolekid3899 yes, they can only because of our outdated energy system. And that's fine, you like coal. I guess you have no problem with America loosing it's relavence in the energy market then?
3
@tobesmith7632 they need to stop giving republican politicians a break. The next time someone cries a fraudulent wolf they need to throw the book at em, hard and fast.
3
@tobesmith7632 or do you just unironically believe that the largest cover up in human history, that would directly involved our government and our administrations compliance with other governments, would have went completely under his nose and raidar? And if that's true, what else has been allowed to take place while he's been out golfing and being ignorant to what our government has been doing? The only answer of course is there must be a shadow government. It couldn't possibly a be a series of corrupt lobbiests and media giants who want to maintain power and put whoever in charge to further that agenda. It's all the Democrats fault. And Trump definitely doesn't represent the media or billionaires despite being a billionaire who made his fame by abusing the media. Sure my guy, sure. Grow up.
3
@tobesmith7632 did you also mention that even when including those descrepancies that it did not alter the official results?
3
@tobesmith7632 why is it so hard to admit your statistics are being regurgitated from unreliable sources, and your argument is dubious at best?
3
@royhobbs5167 here you are asking the tough questions huh?
2
@tobesmith7632 do you also wanna talk about how if "plandemic" was true, Trump would have known about it and been briefed on it?
2
@tobesmith7632 y'all got so bent out of shape about crooked politicians you forgot who buys crooked politicians. People like..... Trump!! 🤣
2
@tobesmith7632 it helps to give all that information, in context.
2
@tobesmith7632 did you also know that when you look into the specifics of those descrepancies a majority of the "fraudulent" ballots would have came from Republican voters? I mean, you say it's easy to look up yet you miss or overlooked this stuff.
2
@tobesmith7632 then can you address why that ended up being debunked and after further investigation found more fraud coming from Republicans? You can say the same lie a thousand times but it doesn't make it anymore true.
2
@tobesmith7632 you didn't provide anything, and if I look at the report I will do it on my own terms, and here you are, again, assuming I didn't. TJ said it best. All those stats you ran through where not in the report.
2
@beigefox6579 looks like someone else who doesn't get the point and regurgitates fox news talking points instead. Go back to Tucker, he'll give you what you need.
2
@h.a.l.3980 no one said anything about piping it in. It would be gradual, but more than possible to do things like solar roofs or siding. Wind catches in cities like Chicago would work extremely effectively. People like you existed 30 years ago and said things like what musk is doing now would be impossible then, that's why I bring him up. It doesn't matter what education I have. Eventually someone will come along to make it all even more practical and affordable. I'd even place money on it.
2
@h.a.l.3980 the coal and oil companies didn't sit and wait for their products to drift away with the technology in there early years, they fought hard to get where they are on the global energy market, a lot of that goes into it's practicality. They still spend a lot of money to try and keep it that way. Years and millions to billions of dollars have been spent on research to make it safer and more streamlined. And we're starting to see how alternatives could eventually catch up or even surpass it in some ways. Will we find a way to store and transport batteries? Or find a way to turn buildings into solar and wind catches so the very structures around us are helping collect energy? It's more than possible. The technology will advance and get to the point we can have entire smart cities. You just don't want to believe it could be.
2
How is it convenient when everyone who's been going against the base is being labeled an enime? He understands the risk, and he cares more about calling out his party than being ostracized by it. Stop being a simp.
1
@guacamolekid3899 guac is one of my favorite side dishes. Just get me some chips and I'll have you down in no time.
1
@guacamolekid3899 clean fuel in general is a myth. There are only greener alternatives. And yes, a lot of alternatives leave a smaller footprint than coal and oil.
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe I love how you took the time to say this on Thanksgiving. Did you get uninvited to your family gathering so decide to take it out on the internet?
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe we didn't have a booming economy. We still have the same amount of jobs, and unemployment has been going down drastically ever since Biden took office. We didn't have self sufficient oil before then. We had a president who took us backwards with energy technology and renewables.
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe not only that, but you took the time to say this on Thanksgiving. Did you get uninvited and decide to take your anger out on online strangers?
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe why's our unemployment rate back down under 5% then? Why is the chief complaint coming from workers not going back to work working conditions and wages? And the government has been in debt since the Bush era.
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe and it's not that everyone else is obsessed with Trump, it's that his followers are and everyone else is tired of hearing about him. So they spend their time countering every crazy bit of nonsense you morons bring up. And it's becoming a menotenous chore. It's like being a teacher always having to correct the one kid who keeps telling everyone toilet snakes exist and creeps out half the class.
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe you got triggered just by me saying Thanksgiving. Enough said.
1
@SirPatrickMackofMaplethorpe take you're own advice and don't have kids. They'd probably end up in foster care anyway judging by how angry you got over someone simply mentioning Thanksgiving. You'd probably end up being imprisoned for child endangerment.
1
I hope he reads this and is stung by it. You put in so much effort.
1
@h.a.l.3980 At least I'm not an oil company stooge. I'm fine with my lot in life.
1
@h.a.l.3980 still would be better than an oil company stooge.
1
@h.a.l.3980 oh you can be a geotech and a stooge at the same time. You're being one right now.
1
@h.a.l.3980 Playing dumb eh? Well guess what, he ain't playing.
1
@h.a.l.3980 it's like you didn't actually read anything I said. Haha, you're laughable. I said there wasn't one, I said oil fought to get there and become the practical standard for industry. Please catch up.
1
@h.a.l.3980 guess what's starting to sell more?
1
@h.a.l.3980 Can't hear you over them sales.
1
@h.a.l.3980 https://youtu.be/tgIqecROs5M
1
@h.a.l.3980 history is history but the future will be what it will be.
1
@h.a.l.3980 for now.
1
@h.a.l.3980 and like I said there are already energy companies who have switched almost completely over to renewables like wind farms. Once they figure out how to collect energy in urban areas, and are able to macro and micro farm renewables, combined with things like tidal turbines and advancing tech that way oil will be reserve for stockings and the plastics in windmills.
1
@h.a.l.3980 sale
1
@h.a.l.3980 uh huh. And the areas that don't need it won't use it or at least won't have to. And that list will drop with every new step they take. Sale.
1
@h.a.l.3980 yeah, you're a stooge. Big oil till you die. Maybe move to a city that you know will never switch to renewables so you can keep your job security.
1
@h.a.l.3980 Yes, there are some areas that will still need it. The more other technology develops the less we as a whole will have to use it. Keep going stooge. Keep stooging it up.
1
@h.a.l.3980 I've acknowledged your point several times over and you still keep trying to beat on it instead of listening. And the whole "go educate yourself" bit. You're also self righteous. Haha, hilarious.
1
@h.a.l.3980 which area do you live in? And are you thinking I'm trying to say I know more than you about the way our current hydrocarbon system works, a geo tech from a gas company, is that where you are thinking a bulk of my argument comes from? Because I understand that every market today still has some from of gas powered or nuclear power plant, and only small areas have managed to harness wind and solar energy to account for anywhere to 20-40% of their population. Some energy companies, hoping to go full wind or solar within the next 20 years. I'm not arguing from a position of the way the current system is ran. I understand why it is ran that way. You're able to do that because in the current market, the kinds of solar and wind power gadgets we can afford currently can only hope to power a portion of our current energy consumption. Making buybacks possible since you are essentially selling back the energy you saved by having solar panels. I'm not arguing from a position of the current state of technology. I'm arguing about how current trends and inventions might change the future of how energy is looked at and talked about. And I can only do this from my perspective, based on what I have seen and heard and been informed of.
1
@h.a.l.3980 just now realizing I said current too many times.
1
@h.a.l.3980 well, one can argue that with all technology, it gets smaller, smarter, and better over time. Who is to say they don't invent micro turbines that can be put on skyscrapers one day that can power the Chrysler building.
1
@h.a.l.3980 That or you'd have to re-enginer a whole new kind of building to make up for the drag since current buildings would probably just start to collapse. Haha
1
@h.a.l.3980 that's what I'm talking about, when renewables reach the point they can be integrated into architecture, in a way that's practical for an urban area. That will be fascinating
1
@h.a.l.3980 and sure, it may not ever release our dependence on oil, I can see that clearer now. But we can slow it down to a trickle in some areas.
1
@h.a.l.3980 I'm sorry for calling you a stooge. I guess not all people from oil companies are bad.
1
@h.a.l.3980 dude, really?
1
@h.a.l.3980 no, I'm only an idiot for wasting this much time talking to you then taking back calling you a stooge.
1
@h.a.l.3980 do you understand what I am saying now or should I get the crayons next?
1
@h.a.l.3980 How trustworthy is the Colorado independent?
1
@h.a.l.3980 how trustworthy is the Denver post or Denver's government website?
1
@h.a.l.3980 have you read what they have to say about xcels 2030 goals?
1
@h.a.l.3980 it looks like, someone is making, sales. :)
1
@h.a.l.3980 Do you not believe that I have taken your poorly presented points into consideration?
1
@h.a.l.3980 what is xcels 2030 goal?
1
@h.a.l.3980 I see, your trying to make the conversation about things I didn't say now. I never brought up morals. Please point to when I brought up morals?
1
@h.a.l.3980 what are xcels 2030 energy goals?
1
@h.a.l.3980 do you know what the bay areas 2030 goals are? And who ebce is?
1
@h.a.l.3980 maybe you can tell me of con ed's 2040 goals for New York?
1
@h.a.l.3980 yay!! We've stuck with the appeal to authority I see?
1
@h.a.l.3980 huh, I wonder why top economist D Timmins of Boston university predicts that switching to renewables will loosen up the economy? Maybe your scientists should stick to their field of study and leave the economics to the economists?
1
@h.a.l.3980 yes, an economist has a better understanding of the economy than a scientist does, since, that's his field of study. Are you saying that that your world renown scientist knows more about economics than an economist?
1
@h.a.l.3980 Christ dude, get a grip
1
@h.a.l.3980 if I want to know what oil is most efficient when combusted, I'll ask a scientist. If I want to know how it will effect the economy 12 years from now, I'll ask an economist.
1
@h.a.l.3980 what? You produce and store electricity. It's dependant on the on site equipment. Anywhere can have onsite equipment to produce and store electricity. You're argument makes no sense because you would not need to transport anything. You'd just need to make sure you have a system that can keep up with your wattage demands at the location you are at.
1
@h.a.l.3980 the free market has been manipulated by oil and gas to give them an unfair advantage in the global economy. So yes, the free market did naturally favor them. And they took that favor, along with the power and influence money could buy, and used it to inflate there bottom dollar and stockpiles at the expense of our environment and people. So you are correct that oil companies are not evil persay. They have just been at the top of the game for so long that they're now behaving like spoiled kids.
1
@h.a.l.3980 how is Elon musk doing?
1
@h.a.l.3980 Dude, technology is advancing in that front every day. Quite being a nay sayer. Renewable energy technology is advancing in exactly that way. We may even see breakthroughs like that within our lifetime. I'm curious as to why you think it can't or won't happen? Just because we have the structure we do now? That can, and will change with time. And the less we talk those types of alternatives, the more we fall behind the rest of the world who is advancing in that way.
1
@h.a.l.3980 we are even seeing more and more companies switch to solar and wind for back ups since they can be charged and stored and make for more sustainable plans long term. It's like you've never seen half of the advancements being utilized. The largest issues right now with it are, it's in it's infancy and hasn't worked out all the bugs and details yet. But once those become more efficient and effective (which is only a matter of time) you won't need to run off of gas generated city power, and can run off of batteries and sunlight. It's affordability, and efficiency, is only going to get better with time
1
@h.a.l.3980 as a matter of fact, right now Idaho power uses 40-60% wind energy (I can't remember the exact number) to power the treasure valley. That's Boise, Idaho and the surounding area. You telling me that can't be improved on and be expanded to a city like new York or a factory in Michigan within the next 20 years?
1
@h.a.l.3980 there we go. You used to work for an oil company. Now we know why you're so adamant at keeping it on gas. Have a wonderful day.
1
@leechion2933 make informed consumer decisions when and where you can. No one needs a Tesla to make an impact. Sometimes just making better choices at the grocery store makes all the difference.
1
@h.a.l.3980 as a matter of fact, I appreciate people like you. Because without people like you, there would be even less motivation for people to work on these technologies and be able to figure out these obstacles in their path. If it wasn't for neigh sayers like you, the people working on this stuff wouldn't have anyone to prove wrong. So, keep being an oil company stooge, give those developing alternative fuel more fuel for their fire to prove people like you wrong. It's almost a necessary evil.
1
@h.a.l.3980 whatever you say oil company stooge.
1
@h.a.l.3980 you mean like petroleum, plastics, gas, oil, waxes, those kind of things? Never heard of them.
1
@h.a.l.3980 ah so wax, petroleum, plastics, oils, and gases aren't hydrocarbons then?
1
@h.a.l.3980 like seriously, the only purpose that question served was so you could say "nope" then gloat. Spoken like a true stooge.
1
@h.a.l.3980 yup, because that's exactly what my argument was. Keep it up you're making yourself look like a clown.
1
@h.a.l.3980 Point to where I said we'd stop using oil products all together?
1
@h.a.l.3980 because I said the opposite. I admittedly said we'd not be able to completely cut ourselves off from it. I said, we wouldn't have to be as dependent on it for city development and transportation. And oil/hydrocarbons would become secondary for energy use. When did I ever say we'd step away from hydrocarbons completely? You're a stooge, trolling like a stooge, throwing out your degree like a stooge, and didn't bring one iota of evidence. If all you have to rely on is your appeal to authority, your argument isn't as solid as you think it is.
1
@leechion2933 also, when it comes to commercial farming, you're right, there is not much difference between an organic carrot vs a regular carrot. And when it comes to commercial farming, there is little we can do as people to help, except to hold companies accountable who choose to use unsafe products. And I include organic farms in that as well, because a lot of organic farms use detrimental practices and pesticides, but they are organic so it sounds better to a consumer. Eating from organic farms and really anything mass produced is still going to have an impact. It's our responsibility as citizens, to hold responsible those who put the environment at risk with their farming practices. Organic and inorganic alike.
1
@leechion2933 you know, be wise enough to understand what you can change in your daily life, and hold the parties accountable for their fair share too.
1
@leechion2933 if homeless me can find ways to make an impact and save/make money with it, poor you can do the same.
1
@leechion2933 so, if you're trying the "woe is me" approach, you'll get no sympathy from me. I've been on the streets before.
1
@leechion2933 used to be. As in, not currently. You're really just reading whatever you want to out of these aren't you?
1
@leechion2933 name three ways you can minimize impact that help save money, and three ways that don't cost any money. If you can't, then do some research, and get back to me because I know they exist.
1
@leechion2933 and when I was homeless, we'd still be able to have this conversation because of an old laptop I had for free and free wifi access from Starbucks or a grocery store or something else. I didn't need money to look at youtube even when I was broke. Sounds like you just lack determination, knowledge, and imagination.
1
@leechion2933 but that's not fair. I shouldn't just superimpose my life over yours. Your experiences and limitations are valid. Have you ever looked into ways that you can be pro environment that don't cost anything?
1
@leechion2933 you are misreading what I'm saying on purpose. Stop making excuses and find out ways to be helpful that don't cost money.
1