Youtube comments of Zudabaker (@Vyrus36).

  1. 71
  2. 71
  3. 50
  4. 36
  5. 33
  6. 30
  7. 28
  8. 25
  9. 23
  10. 19
  11. 19
  12. 19
  13. 18
  14. 14
  15. 14
  16. 13
  17. 13
  18. 13
  19. 13
  20. 12
  21. 11
  22. 11
  23. 11
  24. 11
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 10
  28. 10
  29. 10
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 5
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. Essentially because it is a mass in motion. So, since the earth rotates, and travels around the sun, and is a large mass, we're all constantly moving even when we are staying still. Up as in out, as in outwards from the earths crust. Since the earth is not only a large mass, and it is in motion, it bends space time relative to it's momentum. At least that's what I think is being suggested. Essentially, if the earth didn't have this momentum, it would either drift further away from the sun, and us along with it, or closer into the sun, and us along with it. But because of it's orbit, it constantly has perfect momentum. The sun builds incredible amounts of momentum, because it too is in orbit around the center of the galaxy. Making each planet, similar to a satilite, in flux between free fall, and and escape velocity. That is the force we are experiencing. Momentum. And we're just along for the ride. Same reason why sometimes stuff sticks to your windshield even though your driving fast but can whipe it off as soon as you get out of the car. We're essentially close enough to that distorted time space that we're along for the ride. Similar to being in a space ship. Only a space ship doesn't have that amount of mass and doesn't generate enough momentum to have people traveling on the outside of it, but bits of dust yes. On the inside, you experience the momentum, just like you don't experience the momentum of being inside a car unless you're accelerating, but if you get hit by one. Oh boy. Making each time you jump, an attempt to break from that momentum that earth has to distort space time in the way it does. What would be interesting to see, if it is momentum itself that is at work or that and other things. Like, if earth was not moving, at all. Would something still change it's course and run into it? And at what rate? How much does space time bend for mass alone? Or would something running into it give it momentum, even the smallest amount, and that would cause it to warp space time?
    3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134.  @denierdev9723  the fact the pandemic happened is proof we need a better social safety net. Military security, aka an armed force, is like having a security guard at a building. They can stop intruders, disrupt theft, notify the police of suspicious activity and respond to orders to help in a tactical approach. A social safety net, is like you're valet, janitor, ECT, everything else that goes into that building to keep it clean and user friendly. If you put all of your money into security, you don't have any money left over to make it user friendly. Maybe this can help clear up some confusion? Also, I have been homeless, and I do talk to the homeless, and I live on the coast. Human migration is a huge deal. The reason why most people migrate to coastal cities is because they have the most opportunities for underprivileged people. If other areas actually offered things like healthcare and food, the homelessness problem would be spread thinner and wouldn't be as impactful. Furthermore, the fastest growing homeless populations are the elderly, students, veterans, and disabled. Our most vulnerable citizens. Reminds me of a quote I heard once. "A nation is like a hospital, or a fire crew. There are people that must work together to be successful. But when a decisive issue rears its head, balls can be dropped, and the people we are supposed to protect, end up being the ones who suffer the most." Have we lost sight of who it is we are supposed to be protecting in this battle of ideals?
    3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156.  @toughgiraffe5865  let me help you then. :) "Step forward: we hear That you are a good man. You cannot be bought, but the lightning Which strikes the house, also Cannot be bought. You hold to what you said. But what did you say? You are honest, you say your opinion. Which opinion? You are brave. Against whom? You are wise. For whom? You do not consider your personal advantages. Whose advantages do you consider then? You are a good friend. Are you also a good friend of the good people? Hear us then: we know. You are our enemy. This is why we shall Now put you in front of a wall. But in consideration of your merits and good qualities We shall put you in front of a good wall and shoot you With a good bullet from a good gun and bury you With a good shovel in the good earth." It's entitled, "interigation of the good" and at the end, the speaker is shot. The person's face, is a combination of world leaders, (meant to trigger those who have a bias one way or another). It is a question, for those who self proclaim as "good" or being "better than". "Are you also a good friend, to the good people?" Do you take sides? Do you just hear what you need to to justify your feelings? Or are you actually unbiased and support who is good and right regardless?? "You say your opinion, what opinion?" "You are brave, against whom?" "You are wise, for whom?" Who are you being brave against? Who is it you are being wise for? Do you know? Or is it just a fantasy in your mind, because thinking about the full truth is difficult?
    3
  157.  @hueykhalidX  money is based on the trade bargaining system that developed from the original hold/keep model. (Why fort Knox was originally full of gold before we moved away from the gold standard) In any central system that requires assets or production to be housed and distributed, has fallen back on forms of currency to monitor that system. People are often quick to point that "money is meaningless" but then don't understand what it developed from. Which was primarily grain storage. The American "hay penny" was an homage to that. Essentially, all currency is only as valuable as the hold or keep that backs it. And it can only be backed, under a hold/keep and distribution system. That's how markets are made, it's what trade is based on. Supply and demand, ergo, the supply of your keep and the demand of the community determines how much wheat you can buy for a penny, or a gold coin, or a Drachma could by if you're referencing ancient Greece. This very structure, and shifting currency further and further away from a tangibly backed standard, (ie away from traditional trade standards where goods and services can be bought and sold with one another and maintains a relative trade value) to what more appears like mathematical gymnastics that ends in a sack of flour being valueless outside of the grocery stores return policy. Unless you can make something with it... The real question is, how do we bypass this so we don't have to rely on a hold/keep and distribution form of economy from a centralized ruling government?
    2
  158. @ xMissyChrissyx Don't be so naive. That's the reason the NFL gave, is that they don't want to offend, and they don't want to turn football political. And it is, very, gun control has become a raging issue in this country due to the media blowing up every shooting case beyond proportion and have been causing the public to call for "justice" and "safety". If it isn't political then why allow all of the other crap commercials that are way more damaging to our psychi and are actually offensive? The last time I checked tolerance is a 2 way street after all. You saying that it's not political is about the most ignorant statement I've ever heard. Of course it's political. The only non political part about it, is the commercial itself. It's just an excuse and pointing finger saying, "it's not political" when actually, it's one of the most political things to happen in the history of commercials. And it goes to show how damaged we've become as a society that we even put this much attention towards an advertisement, and what's even more disappointing is how they have brainwashed millions of people that guns are the cause of the death and destruction when we've been laying waste to nations and killing each other off ever since, well how long has society been around? But yeah, it's the guns fault, all that other shit that happened before guns, that's not human history or human nature at all. I'm sick of how we allow our government to take away our rights, I'm sick of how the media is used to promote private agendas, and most of all I'm sick of ignorance that has spread across our nation like a plague.
    2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162.  @sidneybales9062  yes, conservatives and liberals neither of them really have the black communities interest in mind. Both do underhanded and devicive things to get there way within the black and African American community. A perfect example is gun laws. Look up the truth TV video about gun laws and how both Democrats and Republicans use policy to keep minorities treated like second class citizens. Both sides like to pretend they're "over racism" but truth is, both have been selling us out to corporate interests while putting on a guise of community outreach and "doing something for minorities." Like, you know it's a problem, when we try to congratulate white politicians, actors, corporations, and the like for the advancement of communities not their own. Charity is it's own reward right? So why would someone take away all the power these people have to do better and put it in the hands of politicians and businessmen? Even Trump bragged about how he did more for the black community than any other president. No, the black community does for itself, just like any community would given the tools and resources at their disposal. We congratulate white politicians like Trump and Biden for what they've done for the black community. But then ignore what the black community is doing for themselves and the efforts they have made to improve their own communities. If minority communities are doing well, if they are doing better, give them the credit for taking advantage of the resources available for their communities.
    2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296.  @Teknokill-jm2ub  this is not about what I would rather have. This is about the reality of life. There are many times those serving under leadership might be more qualified compared to a leader, what matters ultimately, is that the team is made of people that can make up for one anothers flaws. And, sometimes intuition fails us, sometimes logic fails us. The two are not mutually exclusive and both are benificial for survival and to make decisions. Some people tend to make them more with the head than the heart and others the other way around. Does that mean I think a captain is going to slide down the slippery slope of cold hard robotic logical decisions that can end in catastrophe if we continue to see stoicism as the Hallmark of leadership? No. It means I trust them to make decisions, and to have wayed those factors before making them. Some are going to be more emotionally driven, going off of gut feelings and intuition, others are going to be more logic drivin, going off of calculations and codes. All and all, at the end of the day, if you're crew responds to you, if you can get the job done, if you have people you can depend on to fill in for your weaknesses, then everything is as it should be. That may look different from ship to ship. That may vary from case to case. What one captain does may not sit well with another. But, if they have earned the respect of their crew, and I find myself on board, what would I ever have to gain by trying to ruin that dynamic? Just for my personal interests? How selfish would that be?
    2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. @Mary Antonio it's not everyone else's fault you don't understand nuance and took Dr. Faucis words out of context. You like many others where spoon fed half truths and incomplete quotes and are now totting them around like "experts" when you probably can't even program a oven clock. You don't understand the difference between an airisol and something that is air born. You don't understand why fauci made his remarks. You don't understand how a curve works during a pandemic. There is a false corolation between mandates and virus numbers, because of the exponential nature of such an outbreak. If you don't understand what exponential means, then you don't have any room to talk. Faucis words was a warning that masks on their own won't stop the virus because of the exponential threat the virus posseses. You have to follow it up with social distancing and self quarantines. Which we didn't do, and idiots like you took his words out of context then to justify not wearing a mask. He was simply saying that it's the first step, but not the only or last step you should take, and we would flatten that curve that way. Not prevent it outright. You're smart enough to understand this. But you choose not to because you'd rather double down on what you've already been spoon fed to believe than admit you could be wrong about something. And worse of all, you pretend to be sure of yourself, and you haven't even done the bare minimum to research it. All you've done is found a way to make your ignorance look credible based on a few quotes and biases. You can't say anything else, because you don't have any argument outside of that.
    2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538.  @runtoth3abyss  no it isn't actually if you looked at the accompanying videos that this channel has been producing they deliberately don't mention names because they hope that people are intelligent enough to realize what's going on within our own country. The difference is a lot of liberals and Democrats don't pay attention to these types of videos because they already understand what is going on and have been trying to get people to understand this. The commenters on these videos are laughable to me because they're eating up everything that this guy's saying without even realizing that they are the largest offenders of it. It's hilarious to me that they are so unaware of themselves, that they would even misuse educational material such as this to call Democrats bad. Everything in these videos is practically screaming "Trump is a totalitarian threat" yet they are so fickle and blind, that they will use any information to make themselves feel good. Even if it's perverting years of psychological research to project their totalitarian ideals onto another party. Like I said before, there is a reason the creator of these videos doesn't use modern names. It's on purpose to see who is adopting the "us vs them" mentality, and it appears to be both of you. Obviously the Republicans are more guilty of this, since they are ligitimatly trying to rally their party under one leader and one ideal. They've become so self serving, that there isn't even room for views outside of Q within their own party anymore. It's gotten to where they are that rediculous and closed off that you can practically spell it out for them, and they'd still try to blame the Democrats, as you have witnessed by looking at the comments on these videos.
    1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550.  @freedommeow  that's a very good bullshit if I've ever heard one. Yes freedom, diversity, liberty, and a few others was the full promise. You almost had me going. Freedom, or otherwise, our founding fathers still believed in scientific advancement and where so appalled by British nationalism that we decided to form our own country. Only to turn around years later and have a bunch of people crazier than the Salem witch hunters, and bringing back dead Victorian values. The idea of freedom can only be preserved by those who are safe enough to be free. In other words, you are not actually free if you have to live in fear. Now to follow that up I say remember Isiah 45 7. "I form the light and create darkness: I make peace and create evil: I the Lord do all these things." I think all of these q anon supporters missed this nugget of info from the bible, or at least are purposefully glossing over it. The truth is, if Trump was president he would have been briefed on the dangers of the coronavirus. He would have known it's potential threat beforehand. Months before it reached us shores, Trump decided to try to gut the CDC pandemic response program, almost ensuring we'd have to have longer quarantine times, and mandates, due to misinformation. You want to understand how "plandemic" worked? Take a look at the organizations actions right before Coronavirus hit us shores. Now look at what has happened since. Yes, the furvered belief in Trump as a savior of the land has only grown since then. His followers increasingly finding flaw with the foundation of our nation, the same foundation they say they hold sacred to the same nation. I guess when you only have room for one line of thought within a party, it gets very difficult to even breathe a different opinion for fear of being ostracized by a big orange man. Like I said before. If you want to understand who the totalitarian is, then ask yourself who is trying to consolidate their parties power under one leader, or one idea? Because the Democrats are made up of several causes and ideas, and have a plethora of voices that come from within. What differing voices and opinions do the Republicans have right now? Because it seems to me, that they are dileberately sperating themselves from anything but q.
    1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754.  @kathleenchilds2837  I know you don't have anything valid to say because all you did was come in here and say "DARPA". Yes and? What about it? I've read the actual pier review studies that suggest a lab leak was possible. And I admit, it definitely is a possibility. But the cats out of the bag so to speak. We have to deal with the aftermath of that first, because people are getting sick and dying. I'm not going to allow myself to be distracted by stuff that is yet to be proven while that is occurring. And, furthermore, Fauci is an internationally accredited Dr. Of course he'd donate money to an international test facility. That's like saying firemen create fire by donating money to gas grill companies in hopes they make a safer product. What the facility did from there, and the Drs in question in it's creation, are a whole different story. Not to mention the Dr who is seen as responsible for introducing these protein spikes happens to be Russian. All Fauci did is donate money, probably at the recommendation of whatever administration was running at the time. This could have far reaching complications that involve any world government. Not to mention this all gets more complicated once you consider Trump did things like instruct Fauci during the early stages of the pandemic, delay our response, and tried to gut the CDC before it came to us shores. And he's now trying to invest in a Chinese company that is under investigation. The bill gates foundation is suspect in all of this, as are Tesla and Bezos who all made billions off of the virus. There are to many people with to many motivations for an event like this to definitively point blame at anyone yet.
    1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. I think the point being missed here is that he was supposed to be unecisarily cruel to show how far he was slipping from his humanity. It even started at the begining of the serries that the longer he stayed there the more he was becoming undead (the role of Ainz) and loosing his human emotions. He also states how he already has no sympathy or kinship for humans going into the world. Meaning that the longer he is in game, the more his sense of humanity slips. He has no problem sending out people who have done far worse to humans than he had before this happened. He had no problem abandoning the adventure group that raided Nazarick in the first place to go and kill them all off. You can tell how far he is slipping by how his right hand man Demiurge keeps blabbing off about what he thinks Ainz is doing and he just goes along with it. Kind of shocked at first, but then laughs it off and becomes totally fine with the role of the supreme being that plans of killing everyone off and taking over the world. It's basically the story of the crazed maniac taking over the world from his perspective going from fair ruler that want's to help to sinister, angry, cruel, conquerer of humans. The "unecessary cruelty" was to show how far Ainz would go to streagnthen his forces when enraged and to show how removed he has become from his human sense of morality. Nothing more, nothing less. And it does have a draw, in the same way people watch documentaries on serial killers. It's interesting because it shows how far his human morality and how out of touch he's becoming with the human world and demonstrates what he is becoming capable of.
    1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878.  @shaun5328  1. You defended trump by saying he didn't do anything wrong to win his election just because they could not pin him specifically with charges. 2. blm was made to look bad by anarchist extremists, and alt right goons who wanted to take advantage of the chaos. We know the names of the boogaloo bois, and proud boys who escalated events in Portland and Minnesota. 3. No, put together a timeline, stop trying to play this what came first the chicken or the egg game with me when we know what dates actions where taking place. 4. Ukraine has been seeking NATO membership ever since 2014 when we supported them then under Bush Jr. 5. There you go, you have a superficial standard for success. 6. America has the KKK and neo Nazis supporting Trump and Russia currently along with alt right extremists. That is one branch of volunteers, and it has 10-20 percent reported Nazi involvement. And yes, I do see a problem with that, which is why I stated very clearly that their government needs to eradicate Nazi membership and involvement in their military. Any percentage of Nazis in your army is too many. Stop using emotionally driven talking points. 7. It appears I'm just talking to a indipendant sellout who pretends to distrust the government, and pretends to be paranoid against a new world order, but then once another country starts invading others under a dictators rule, starts acting like it's justified, because they just don't trust anything except numbers. 🙄 Do you know what centrist sway is? 8. You've been ignoring over half the points I make, and continue to post over them acting like you're opinions are facts. I'm beginning to think you just don't have a good grasp of history or logic. 9. Because you don't seem to understand why I'd think that. I've ran into some neutral contenders that just don't want US involvement. And I agree with that. But you, you unironically support their invasion. You're a charlatan.
    1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888.  @shaun5328  you don't actually live here and argue but if you don't care so I don't believe a God damn thing you have to say in disregard. Like why would I listen to anything you have to say you already admitted you don't care and that you don't have all the information. And then you try to bring in that Russia have the only positive BLM messages? Again I don't believe a goddamn thing you have to say. Oh you mean hearts and minds don't just change overnight wow it's almost like we have years of corrective action to do to make up for years of racist attitudes in this country. Also just because I don't take people's word for it I went ahead and looked up those news stations that you said put BLM in a bad light. And what I found was a bunch of neutral reports that showed the facts of the situation. A majority of them say that BLM protesters have been active as a result of the George Floyd murder and that it "shook the world". I don't see anything from CNN or Al Jazeera or France 24 or anything like that, that holds BLM directly accountable for all of the looting and violence that took place during those rallies. They all report that those things happened but they never reported who was responsible for those. They all talk about how the BLM movement went global and how it had a far-reaching impact and how it sparked protests and cities outside America. You sure you actually read any of those articles? There's one from France 24 about how the French government and intellectuals think that the BLM movement is bad for the world. And from the same network in the same station another article about it's own color blindness. Seems to me like the foreign press gave both sides of the topic, didn't put any bias on it, and made aware what where people's opinions, and what where the facts. I'm seeing a bunch of articles about alt right militant groups rising in America I see a bunch of articles about how some of them have gone to disrupt BLM movements in America. Like did you actually read any of these articles or are you just talking out your ass? I saw one from Al Jazeera about how The alt-right presence at protests in rallies has been escalating the violence of these protests. So when you say all of this stuff is it because you actually checked your facts? Or is it because of more of this false confidence that you keep picking up from the bullshit store?
    1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966.  Fake Theory  you don't really care about people being called names. You say you do because it feels like taking the high road after being called out for calling people you never met hateful. As for dehumanizing fellow Americans, people have done far worse to one another over far less. You don't care so much about that as you care the people being poked fun at happen to align with your ideologies. But, if I may, let's say you are right and people are purposefully misleading one another. Wouldn't the responsible thing to do, if you had the correct information, to share that information? How selfish do you have to be to have all of the answers, then sit back and smirk saying "told ya so." Like, if you understand what is proper to do, why sit on your hands and turn up the beast pretending doing nothing in the face of misinformation is the right answer? Because, again, using Occam's razor, our best answers seem to be leaning towards effort, not stagnation. So if what is considered to be the best course of action (which is appropriately fitting masks, vaccines, and social distancing.) Is being denied as helpful, then surely you have a better and safer alternative? Come on now, don't tell me you have all the answers and have been holding out on the world this whole time? Let me guess, because ideas have people, people don't have ideas? Does that mean you're ideas are not your own and you are incapable of coming up with a unique thought too? I play dumb, but I understand what it means, it means someone of importance and persuasion gives an idea force. But I digress, what is your alternative solution and what is its documented effectiveness? Is it to do nothing and let herd immunity take over? Because we've seen the results of that in other nations. So, please, if you are so informed, and have the best answer for us, can you start a movement and become a leader for the people? Or are you waiting for someone with more charisma than yourself to Cary that torch of insight?
    1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1