Youtube comments of Zudabaker (@Vyrus36).
-
71
-
71
-
50
-
36
-
33
-
30
-
28
-
25
-
23
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@bereal6590 I was victimized by my mother and her manurisms match Amber Heard to a T.
When they played the audio clip of her berating Jonny Depp, it reminded me of when my mom would scream at my dad.
I never saw my dad hit her. Not even once. Then, at the end of their relationship, only then did he get violent. He endured everything.
I'm fed up, with people not listening to those who experienced personalities like hers.
The arrogant, self serving, screatching, nit picking, soul crushing things they do.
There where times she drove me so bonkers I had to leave. And she would follow me. Much like Jonny described of her.
What sickens me most, is that people like you, and others who see this as mutual, or Amber as the victim, ignoring, everyone who's came forward with stories like mine, and more, talking about their abuse and how ambers words and actions triggered there PTSD, just from her tone, and body language alone.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think she deserves as much of the backlash that she gets.
But don't ever make the mistake of putting them on equal footing.
Especially around people who have witnessed her personality type, first hand.
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Leslie thats me look, Amber presents a lot of the same traits and manurisms as my mom.
My mom was abusive and had a habit of embellishing the truth to get her way. And of getting people to believe her.
She threw a 2 leiter bottle at me, gaslit my little brother, my older brother has crippling mental health issues, and taunted my father in front of us kids. But I never saw him get violent even once, until the end.
He took every verbal lashing, every point of abuse. Every tougne lashing. When I heard the audio of Heard berating Depp, it was reminiscent of listening to my abusive, manipulative, egomaniacal mothers rants trying to provoke my dad.
This case hits very close to home to me.
I'm not denying Jonny may have hit Heard, or been physical with her in some way.
What I am saying is that she is embellishing the truth, and her story doesn't match the extent of the damage she says she suffered.
According to the letter of the law, the police have to file a report if there is a suspected domestic despute.
You think those officers are going to risk their jobs just because someone said so?
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Essentially because it is a mass in motion. So, since the earth rotates, and travels around the sun, and is a large mass, we're all constantly moving even when we are staying still.
Up as in out, as in outwards from the earths crust. Since the earth is not only a large mass, and it is in motion, it bends space time relative to it's momentum. At least that's what I think is being suggested.
Essentially, if the earth didn't have this momentum, it would either drift further away from the sun, and us along with it, or closer into the sun, and us along with it.
But because of it's orbit, it constantly has perfect momentum.
The sun builds incredible amounts of momentum, because it too is in orbit around the center of the galaxy.
Making each planet, similar to a satilite, in flux between free fall, and and escape velocity.
That is the force we are experiencing. Momentum. And we're just along for the ride. Same reason why sometimes stuff sticks to your windshield even though your driving fast but can whipe it off as soon as you get out of the car. We're essentially close enough to that distorted time space that we're along for the ride. Similar to being in a space ship.
Only a space ship doesn't have that amount of mass and doesn't generate enough momentum to have people traveling on the outside of it, but bits of dust yes. On the inside, you experience the momentum, just like you don't experience the momentum of being inside a car unless you're accelerating, but if you get hit by one. Oh boy.
Making each time you jump, an attempt to break from that momentum that earth has to distort space time in the way it does.
What would be interesting to see, if it is momentum itself that is at work or that and other things.
Like, if earth was not moving, at all. Would something still change it's course and run into it? And at what rate? How much does space time bend for mass alone?
Or would something running into it give it momentum, even the smallest amount, and that would cause it to warp space time?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@denierdev9723 the fact the pandemic happened is proof we need a better social safety net.
Military security, aka an armed force, is like having a security guard at a building. They can stop intruders, disrupt theft, notify the police of suspicious activity and respond to orders to help in a tactical approach.
A social safety net, is like you're valet, janitor, ECT, everything else that goes into that building to keep it clean and user friendly.
If you put all of your money into security, you don't have any money left over to make it user friendly.
Maybe this can help clear up some confusion?
Also, I have been homeless, and I do talk to the homeless, and I live on the coast.
Human migration is a huge deal. The reason why most people migrate to coastal cities is because they have the most opportunities for underprivileged people.
If other areas actually offered things like healthcare and food, the homelessness problem would be spread thinner and wouldn't be as impactful.
Furthermore, the fastest growing homeless populations are the elderly, students, veterans, and disabled. Our most vulnerable citizens.
Reminds me of a quote I heard once. "A nation is like a hospital, or a fire crew. There are people that must work together to be successful. But when a decisive issue rears its head, balls can be dropped, and the people we are supposed to protect, end up being the ones who suffer the most."
Have we lost sight of who it is we are supposed to be protecting in this battle of ideals?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You know what's most interesting about that theory?
Trump was in charge of America at the time. Yes, our billionaire ex president.
Right before the virus hit, he tried to defund the CDC.
As it was becoming apparent in America, he coached Fauci to remain silent about it's severity.
Himself, several republican senators, bill gates, besos, musk, and more all made money off of the pandemic. Basically, the entire world billionaires club made money on the pandemic, of which, Trump is the poster boy of.
Trump, is now also trying to invest in a Chinese company that is under investigation as we speak.
If the lab release theory holds up, and an investigation is launched, who's administration do you think is going to be looked into?
I mean, honestly, I don't think you fellas have thought this through.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@DaturaReapicusJones why do you continue to support a known traitor?
And you realize what this means right? You can't hide the truth, trumps days are numbered. He can do whatever he wants.
You can say whatever you want. It won't matter, the wolves have his scent.
You can rule for a hundred years, it won't matter, we know he betrayed us.
He can be found innocent, it won't matter, we know he betrayed us.
You can try to run out every democrat from the country. It won't matter, we know he betrayed us.
The wolves have his scent now. And it doesn't matter if it happens tomorrow, 4 years from now, or 20 years from now. Once the wolves start howling, Trump and his ilk will run just the same.
Mark my words, history is not kind to known traitors.
3
-
3
-
@toughgiraffe5865 you mean you don't know? Are you living under a rock? Or do you just unironically believe they where true?
We have Jewish space lasers, lizard people, aliens, china, Russia, antifa did it, witch hunt, false flag, election theft and more, most of which contradict one another, and none of which have any credible evidence.
Plus, Trump is now a known traitor, because we know he tried to snatch the election back.
Now's when you fervantly deny it all, call it fake news, or try to insult me instead of putting up anything resembling an argument.
Here let me start for you, "but (insert "the Dems" Oboma, Clinton, or Biden here) was worser!"
You're not only a liar, but you're also predictable.
😘
3
-
@toughgiraffe5865 let me help you then. :)
"Step forward: we hear
That you are a good man.
You cannot be bought, but the lightning
Which strikes the house, also
Cannot be bought.
You hold to what you said.
But what did you say?
You are honest, you say your opinion.
Which opinion?
You are brave.
Against whom?
You are wise.
For whom?
You do not consider your personal advantages.
Whose advantages do you consider then?
You are a good friend.
Are you also a good friend of the good people?
Hear us then: we know.
You are our enemy. This is why we shall
Now put you in front of a wall. But in consideration of your merits and good qualities
We shall put you in front of a good wall and shoot you
With a good bullet from a good gun and bury you
With a good shovel in the good earth."
It's entitled, "interigation of the good" and at the end, the speaker is shot.
The person's face, is a combination of world leaders, (meant to trigger those who have a bias one way or another).
It is a question, for those who self proclaim as "good" or being "better than".
"Are you also a good friend, to the good people?"
Do you take sides? Do you just hear what you need to to justify your feelings? Or are you actually unbiased and support who is good and right regardless??
"You say your opinion, what opinion?"
"You are brave, against whom?"
"You are wise, for whom?"
Who are you being brave against? Who is it you are being wise for?
Do you know? Or is it just a fantasy in your mind, because thinking about the full truth is difficult?
3
-
@hueykhalidX money is based on the trade bargaining system that developed from the original hold/keep model. (Why fort Knox was originally full of gold before we moved away from the gold standard)
In any central system that requires assets or production to be housed and distributed, has fallen back on forms of currency to monitor that system.
People are often quick to point that "money is meaningless" but then don't understand what it developed from. Which was primarily grain storage. The American "hay penny" was an homage to that.
Essentially, all currency is only as valuable as the hold or keep that backs it. And it can only be backed, under a hold/keep and distribution system.
That's how markets are made, it's what trade is based on. Supply and demand, ergo, the supply of your keep and the demand of the community determines how much wheat you can buy for a penny, or a gold coin, or a Drachma could by if you're referencing ancient Greece.
This very structure, and shifting currency further and further away from a tangibly backed standard, (ie away from traditional trade standards where goods and services can be bought and sold with one another and maintains a relative trade value) to what more appears like mathematical gymnastics that ends in a sack of flour being valueless outside of the grocery stores return policy. Unless you can make something with it...
The real question is, how do we bypass this so we don't have to rely on a hold/keep and distribution form of economy from a centralized ruling government?
2
-
@ xMissyChrissyx
Don't be so naive. That's the reason the NFL gave, is that they don't want to offend, and they don't want to turn football political. And it is, very, gun control has become a raging issue in this country due to the media blowing up every shooting case beyond proportion and have been causing the public to call for "justice" and "safety".
If it isn't political then why allow all of the other crap commercials that are way more damaging to our psychi and are actually offensive? The last time I checked tolerance is a 2 way street after all.
You saying that it's not political is about the most ignorant statement I've ever heard. Of course it's political. The only non political part about it, is the commercial itself. It's just an excuse and pointing finger saying, "it's not political" when actually, it's one of the most political things to happen in the history of commercials. And it goes to show how damaged we've become as a society that we even put this much attention towards an advertisement, and what's even more disappointing is how they have brainwashed millions of people that guns are the cause of the death and destruction when we've been laying waste to nations and killing each other off ever since, well how long has society been around? But yeah, it's the guns fault, all that other shit that happened before guns, that's not human history or human nature at all.
I'm sick of how we allow our government to take away our rights, I'm sick of how the media is used to promote private agendas, and most of all I'm sick of ignorance that has spread across our nation like a plague.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sidneybales9062 yes, conservatives and liberals neither of them really have the black communities interest in mind.
Both do underhanded and devicive things to get there way within the black and African American community.
A perfect example is gun laws. Look up the truth TV video about gun laws and how both Democrats and Republicans use policy to keep minorities treated like second class citizens.
Both sides like to pretend they're "over racism" but truth is, both have been selling us out to corporate interests while putting on a guise of community outreach and "doing something for minorities."
Like, you know it's a problem, when we try to congratulate white politicians, actors, corporations, and the like for the advancement of communities not their own.
Charity is it's own reward right? So why would someone take away all the power these people have to do better and put it in the hands of politicians and businessmen?
Even Trump bragged about how he did more for the black community than any other president. No, the black community does for itself, just like any community would given the tools and resources at their disposal.
We congratulate white politicians like Trump and Biden for what they've done for the black community. But then ignore what the black community is doing for themselves and the efforts they have made to improve their own communities.
If minority communities are doing well, if they are doing better, give them the credit for taking advantage of the resources available for their communities.
2
-
It's the cycle of life. Except seen through a different scope. The life of a society is marked by adversity and revolution. Adversity at it's foundation, and a revolution at it's end to create adversity.
Meaning, it ultimately depends on how bright and honest your leaders happen to be during the time of a revolution.
At the end of a civilization cycle, it's usually kicked off with severe distrust between social, political, and economic standings, which, needs to be disassembled so they can continue to keep going, or else it risks cannibalizing itself (economically speaking) to the point all land and wealth (not money, wealth, what you own that can be inherited) are owned by a subclass of rulers and everything else is more or less just rented at their mercy.
Of course, society has never fully engulfed itself like that, and it's in large part to, the revolution.
Pray you have bright leadership.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@doccarter5283 you obviously have never heard of exceptions to that rule.
It's called "argument from fallacy" or "argumentum ad fallacy" or " the bad reasons fallacy" or (as I like to call it) the boy who cried wolf fallacy.
It states, that just because a fallacy exists within an argument, that it does not automatically invalidate the conclusion. It just makes that point invalid.
In matters of showing motivation, character can be brought into question. This happens all the time, in the court of law.
I'd follow your own advice, and stop with that strategy, it was dead before you started. I know, that I know more about logic than you, because you jumped to the lowest tier of argument, unironically, which is, the argument from fallacy.
You're move boy who cried fallacy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bryanl4626 Jackson Mississippi? Jackson Wyoming?
What's the poverty rate in the town?
Because Boise Idaho also, has low crime rates.
But it also has a lot of millionaires per Capita, a solid education system, the population density isn't as bad as LA New York, Chicago, or Phoenix. They're homeless population is primarily people who live the camping lifestyle so they aren't really seen in the city.
But, as Boise continues to grow, and the more disperity that takes place, crime rates have been increasing as people have become more and more desperate over the last few years.
Can you also provide the rate of poverty for your area, and how that has fluctuated over the last ten years? What is minimum wage vs the average rent? Is it a high traffic city that is a hub between many destinations and therefore has a lot of traveling in it? Because that effects crime as well, the amount of tourism and travel in an area.
I wonder if you considered any of these factors before deciding to post.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheMrVerified what baffles me is how many of these types have adopted the "alpha male" personality.
In the wild, species who feel a constant need to protect, feel threatened and need defense strategies, who measure success by showing off, fight one another for mating rights, and are quick to put down others for "masculinity" or a lack there of, are sheep, elk, deer, you know, grazing animals and herbivors.
Wolves, operate in familial hierarchies as a pack. Not alpha hierarchies like most tend to believe. And often times, the elder female is the most respected member of a wolf pack.
Bears and tigers operate under the notion of territory and respect.
And in lion prides there are often 2-3 males who share roles and responsibilities.
The misconception is when young, adolescent carnivores go out to make a pack or a pride, or try to find territory for themselves.
It's less about hierarchies, and more about age, respect, family, and species dynamics.
The animals in nature that most resemble the "alpha male" as seen by western society and media, are all grazing animals.
2
-
@jonathanbrianlichty I'm not assuming. I'm going through the diagnosis process as well.
I just got diagnosed with ADHD, and they are looking for potential diagnosis into autism spectrum. I also happen to be a psychological student who is researching the breakthroughs in empathy research.
Also, generally people don't get diagnosed with several personality disorders from the dsm 5. They get diagnosed with a handful because they share high co-morbidity rates.
I'm saying this, because traits, diagnosis, are not "light or dark".
And as my psychologist put it, will power is different from having triggers. No amount of will power in the world matters when it comes to a psychological trigger. It's just something we have to be aware of to curb those impulses and responses.
I know issues are identifiable without having to label them "dark" or "light".
That is the issue and my contention. Not that diagnosis is a long process where multiple disorders have overlapping qualities making them harder to pin down.
It's that we make those diagnosis harder to maintain accuracy when we share misinformation about psychological health, and the diagnostic process.
And, I'm not saying this to take anything away from you. I'm saying this so you realize what a feat it is, to go through what you have and be able to manage your emotions, at all.
If anything. I'm telling you your not giving yourself enough credit.
Maybe you shouldn't assume?
2
-
@freedommeow I think the creator purposely doesn't use modern names because he hopes we are intelligent enough to make the comparisons to today's times.
All you have to do, is see who has a furvered belief that they are the only answer to our problems, and that only they have the solutions.
You can further notice their totalitarian ideals by their willingness to consolidate rule, to one party or leader, turning the opposition into useless talking heads trying to refute this one mindset and one person being propped up as the definitive answer or solution to the problems we are facing.
Now, if we look at the Salem witch trials, (which is the only real case of a totalitarianism mind set in America) we can determine that the main cause of the mentality, stems from fear, and a longingness to control that which they don't understand.
If you happened to miss the accompanying videos, it's always marked by anti-discovery, anti-science and fact, and instead pro conspiracy, pro division, and an idea that only one leader can save us.
To me it's obvious. Only one political party in America is trying to rally their platform around one man's ideas.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 if the shoe fits, again you take the high road, I'll take the low road, and I'll get to Scotland before you.
The only argument you have left, is one from this psuedo moral position, where name calling is somehow insufferable.
In case of character, it can, and does get used against you in debate all the time.
If you backpedal on your words, if you can't follow through with your points after being asked direct questions, then you are, in fact, a fizzle.
Don't like that? Then stop being so much of a fizzle.
One of the things I can't stand is when pseudo intellectuals like you try to purport that ad hominem attacks automatically invalidate the person who's speaking.
The only thing that it does is make that particular point invalid.
And in cases of calling character into question it is valid.
Because if you can be shown to be unreliable when defending your stance then I have every right to call that out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 why can't you answer a simple question without using loaded questions?
I don't hate you, but I think your argument is poorly thought out, and I don't think you've actually thought this through as far as you think you have.
The fact you can't answer the obvious question, and instead have to ask your own loaded questions, just tells me that it makes you uncomfortable.
So, for the last time, do, you, speak, for, those, people?
Stop dodging, and answer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@r.tothea.tother.4221 no, you didn't, and what goes unsaid, actually says alot in debate.
You could have acknowledged that we can make things better, but you didn't.
You could have talked about the necessity of voter expansion, but you didn't.
Instead, you tried to drive home the talking point, that some people don't actually have it that bad, and when asked to elaborate on it, I got crickets and diversions.
I honestly hope I do, Im going to school for philosophy and psychology. I hope to enter accidemic debates and make a difference.
Yet another bluff bites the dust huh?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In any time honored tradition, it's not okay to call yourself a guru, an earth angel, an alien, etc.
Those are titles to be bestowed upon you by great and wise spiritual leaders.
From honored Ayahuasca ceremonies, to tibetan monks. They do not self shaman, self guru, or anything like that.
And when asked about it, do not hesitate to give credit to their teachers.
Always beware of the self shaman, the self guru. Pay attention to their words, how they claim to get their information. Pay attention to who they thank for their gifts. If they even thank anyone at all...
Ask them how they feel about things that are out of our control like genetic disabilities. Do they feel the sick children are being punished for a past life? Or do they see someone who struggles and we need to show compassion for?
Ask yourself these and . more when approaching a self proclaimed "shaman" or "guru".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Teknokill-jm2ub this is not about what I would rather have. This is about the reality of life.
There are many times those serving under leadership might be more qualified compared to a leader, what matters ultimately, is that the team is made of people that can make up for one anothers flaws.
And, sometimes intuition fails us, sometimes logic fails us. The two are not mutually exclusive and both are benificial for survival and to make decisions.
Some people tend to make them more with the head than the heart and others the other way around.
Does that mean I think a captain is going to slide down the slippery slope of cold hard robotic logical decisions that can end in catastrophe if we continue to see stoicism as the Hallmark of leadership? No.
It means I trust them to make decisions, and to have wayed those factors before making them.
Some are going to be more emotionally driven, going off of gut feelings and intuition, others are going to be more logic drivin, going off of calculations and codes.
All and all, at the end of the day, if you're crew responds to you, if you can get the job done, if you have people you can depend on to fill in for your weaknesses, then everything is as it should be.
That may look different from ship to ship. That may vary from case to case. What one captain does may not sit well with another.
But, if they have earned the respect of their crew, and I find myself on board, what would I ever have to gain by trying to ruin that dynamic? Just for my personal interests?
How selfish would that be?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Fake Theory you don't care about people being called idiots for not taking the virus seriously.
No, what really bothers you is questioning your own intelligence as a result.
So rather than promote corrections to information, and being a cause for enlightenment, and safety.
You'd rather take that information and use it to help people feel better about doing nothing, or being anti mask or anti vax?
Let me get this straight, you know the truth and are using it to make people feel okay about doing the wrong thing or nothing at all? Your taking the truth about masks and using it as a talking point against covid restrictions instead of educating people on what kind of mask to use?
Like, you understand this, and you understand what the virus is doing, and you could be telling people to use better masks, but instead your saying, "they told us to use the wrong ones better give up?"
Is that it? Do you yourself wear a mask or do you not consider it worth it even though you know exactly what kind you'd need to keep yourself and your family safe?
What a waste of intelligence.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
He did give a medical opinion in a court case based on public knowledge.
You can talk about the traits, you can name the traits, but you can't tie them to a specific disorder.
And yes, he is splitting hairs, that is the issue here, is your not allowed to comment on a diagnosis, or to link it to the disorder. You can name the traits you can give your expert opinion of those traits. But as soon as you attempt to link that information to a diagnosis or give an opinion to what that represents, you're guilty.
Haha, no he isn't just trying to tell it like it is, he's backpedaling, because he did the wrong thing.
By alluding the traits to narcissistic personality by calling them "narcissistic personality traits" and not letting the lawyers ask about the traits and their association to any disorders.
That's the difference.
He needs to be held accountable.
2
-
@whatsthebigfndeal your simple.
You're a fake, and a coward, and I can prove it.
You don't distrust the government like you say, you only distrust Democrats.
You can't make an argument outside of projection and ad hominem because your inept in an argument.
You brought up dunning Kruger then hilariously showed blatant ignorance to how our voting works.
Once backed into a corner, you lashed out and called everyone else the problem. Is that really so or did you simply run out of credible things to say?
"Step forward, we hear that you are a good man
You stand by what you said, but what did you say?
You say you can't be bought, but the lighting, which strikes us down, also cannot be bought.
You do not consider your advantages? Who's advantages do you consider then?
You are a "good" friend, are you also a good friend of the good people?
Hear us then, we know you are our enime. That is why we shall now put you in front of a wall.
But in consideration of your good qualities, we will put you in front of a good wall, shoot you with a good gun, and burry you, in the good earth."
-interigation of the good Bertolt Bretch.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@toughgiraffe5865 yeah I know one side keeps wanting everyone to put all of their faith into Trump and his policies and the other one is wanting people to consider a multitude of different people's views, their plights, and challenges. Weird huh?
So, you tell me, who has only one platform they are running on and says "trust me because reasons!"
Who's the one who keeps getting laughed out of court rooms for not having evidence?
Man, you walked right into the point and still missed it.
And you're right, there is no hope for you, if you only believe in the Republicans.
But you know, you can always continue to assume my political affiliation and ideologies.
Yes, the media is corrupt, all of it, not just the parts that slam Trump like you think.
Also, we have logical tools, like Occam's razor, and things like reasoning, and accreditation, to help determine a good source from a bad source.
Morons like you cherry pick info based on where it came from, and not how the information was put together.
🤣🤣🤣
You definitely are lost, nice projection my man. 🤣🤣🤣
I mean, the media is a one sided juggernaut that hates Republicans. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Get a grip.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@2Sinamin that's completely accurate. They are victims of the dunning Kruger effect.
It's kinda counter intuitive but basically, if you believe you can be susceptible to it, you're more likely to acknowledge when you lack information, are better at educating yourself, are more open minded, and more receptive to new information.
If you believe you are immune to it, well, then you're ignorance probably outweighs your intelligence and you're not aware and probably will never be unless something happens that forces you to shuffle around your thoughts.
If you believe you are immune to ignorance, then you probably are ignorant and will remain so.
If you believe you can be ignorant of topics, then you're more likely to learn, and acknowledge where you lack information so you can learn.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bitrudder3792 yeah, you're right, the amount of conspiracies coming from the right is concerning.
I don't understand why so many different bad ideas have came around, I almost think it's intentional.
Like, as soon as one conspiracy gets put down, 2 more come up in it's place. And they started kicking into high gear right around when Trump entered the political scene.
I believe they are dileberately placed to cause confusion and distrust.
And then, in that confusion, anyone can say anything, and as long as there is a sliver of evidence to support it, it can be taken as truth. And since there is so much misinformation, anyone can dismiss anything as a lie.
It's a sort of information Hydra where only people who understand how to sort a good source from a bad source can see their way through.
Pride comes before the fall, hubris rarely pays off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GershomSeventyEight because officers are supposed to give citizens the benifit of the doubt unless they have an obvious reason to stop someone.
If he was unloading a mattress, or a couch, then yes, you'd probably have a point. Or if someone had phoned in with a man matching his description continually illegally dumping you'd have a point.
But it's just not an officers job to hassle citizens over minor infractions. If it was, we'd see a lot more jaywalking tickets than we currently do. Minor crimes, usually have to be blatant and disruptive, other wise officers are supposed to give you the benifit of the doubt.
You know, assume innocence unless you have a suspicion of guilt?
So, what was so out of the ordinary that the suspicion of guilt arose?
What could have possibly had these cops, who would otherwise just let someone be and drive by, stop this man?
It doesn't seem like a grandiose display of illegal dumping that would require police involvement now does it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lronhoover7637 that's a YouTube video...
Haha. "I don't have YouTube sources!" *Puts up video from YouTube."
Yes, a cited source can technically be anything but accredited sources are specific.
Do you believe any citation is credible?
Also, you have yet to inform me of the accredited video, journal, speech, paper, or article you extracted this info from.
So, no, you didn't cite anything.
As a matter of fact, I think you are presenting someone else's research/theory as your own, and are afraid to expose that fact.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UCm4feOcWJOMGpIp_lLNY-fA yes, I'm aware of the potential that it was a lab release.
However, without sufficient evidence, we have to apply logical tools like Occam's razor and remove assumptions from the evidence.
So, yes, it's definitely a possibility that it came from the lab in Wuhan, and was released intentionally.
A very good possibility, and would open a whole line of questioning IF proven.
And, if and when it is proven, I'll be one of the first to conclude that all those accountable must be dealt with swiftly.
But until then, it's all speculation on the specifics, and as a rational human, I must reserve judgement until the facts are in.
But don't worry, I know you won't be able to stop yourself from saying, "told ya so" if future evidence reveals it to be the case. 😘
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lronhoover7637 and for all of corporate media's follies, Trump's deal with China, and his wanting to shut down the CDC, and him telling Fauci to remain silent, has gone relatively unreported by corporate media.
Sure they glossed over it because it's a jab at the guy, but they didn't double down on reporting it like they do to call out his derogatory remarks, the inserection, fraud, Russia, or lying about the pandemic, or any of those things.
If anything, I bring those points up because they seem to not be a target by corporate media, and have more or less been glossed over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Now I understand why I don't believe empaths exist. It's not that I don't believe empathy doesn't exist, or that people can't be predominantly empathetic.
Here is why. I believe "empath" isn't a diagnosis, and shouldn't be, because it, alone, doesn't explain a diagnosis.
Even the term "dark empath" doesn't fully.
To me, it's too clunky.
But it should be recognized in diagnosis.
But as a qualifier to specify a type of diagnosis.
Instead of "dark empath" we should instead use the term, "emotive" as a pre-qualifier to diagnose someone who has a hightened sense of emotional awareness/sensitivity.
Someone who has empathetic personality traits. Or we can even use the word "empathetic" as the pre-qualifier to save confusion.
Because, it's so varied and nuanced that i believe it will appear differently and manifest differently depending on what it is alongside.
For instance, an empathetic sociopath is going to look different from an empathetic psychopath.
And the same time, someone with empathetic cptsd is going to look different than someone who has empathetic depression.
Just "empath" isn't a diagnosis.
You can be an empathetic person, have an empathetic personality. But I don't think we shouldn't be calling ourselves "empaths". It's limiting, and it creates more stigma than it helps prevent, and undermines how this could be understood and approached. We should expand testing on some of these theories and see what there is to find before we just start calling people "empaths".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Christel Elsea not once did I scream racism.
As a matter of fact, I fully acknowledged they are not inherently racist, but gave examples of how they are clasist, and how minorities happen to make up a significant portion of our impoverished neighborhoods.
The only problem is, we need free ids if you're going to enforce id requirements.
Real ids, America was never supposed to be a pay for citizenship type environment.
And yes, people did, for years, but no one listens to the needs of impoverished neighborhoods. And when they do make enough noise to be heard, people like you, pretend Americans just deserve the treatment.
It's baffling how we pride ourselves to be a free nation, then treat the uneducated and impoverished like 2nd class citizens if they can't get a state id in a timely manner.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@freedommeow that's a very good bullshit if I've ever heard one. Yes freedom, diversity, liberty, and a few others was the full promise.
You almost had me going. Freedom, or otherwise, our founding fathers still believed in scientific advancement and where so appalled by British nationalism that we decided to form our own country.
Only to turn around years later and have a bunch of people crazier than the Salem witch hunters, and bringing back dead Victorian values.
The idea of freedom can only be preserved by those who are safe enough to be free.
In other words, you are not actually free if you have to live in fear.
Now to follow that up I say remember Isiah 45 7. "I form the light and create darkness: I make peace and create evil: I the Lord do all these things." I think all of these q anon supporters missed this nugget of info from the bible, or at least are purposefully glossing over it.
The truth is, if Trump was president he would have been briefed on the dangers of the coronavirus. He would have known it's potential threat beforehand.
Months before it reached us shores, Trump decided to try to gut the CDC pandemic response program, almost ensuring we'd have to have longer quarantine times, and mandates, due to misinformation.
You want to understand how "plandemic" worked? Take a look at the organizations actions right before Coronavirus hit us shores.
Now look at what has happened since.
Yes, the furvered belief in Trump as a savior of the land has only grown since then. His followers increasingly finding flaw with the foundation of our nation, the same foundation they say they hold sacred to the same nation.
I guess when you only have room for one line of thought within a party, it gets very difficult to even breathe a different opinion for fear of being ostracized by a big orange man.
Like I said before. If you want to understand who the totalitarian is, then ask yourself who is trying to consolidate their parties power under one leader, or one idea?
Because the Democrats are made up of several causes and ideas, and have a plethora of voices that come from within.
What differing voices and opinions do the Republicans have right now? Because it seems to me, that they are dileberately sperating themselves from anything but q.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@freedommeow plus if you remember actual history, Sparta never developed beyond that, meanwhile Alexander of Macedonia not only outdid the Spartans in combat, but after doing so freed their slaves, and went on to conquer the Persian empire, and did it while spreading freedom and the idea of a Republic.
In comparison Sparta is barely noticeable to cultural history, and a footnote in military history.
And furthermore, the Persians they fought against, where the founders of a code of conduct for wartime, treated prisoners of war well, offered tribute to nations they conquered, and freed slaves of foreign nations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@freedommeow also, remember Isiah 45 7.
The Lord creates the darkness and the light, it is from him all things are possible. It's not some indefinite progress and kindness, it's everything.
Remember, Jesus taught us to be aware of what step to take. To question actions of men and ourselves, but not be hesitant to act upon what we feel is right.
It's like not being afraid to make a mistake while acting upon doing the right thing, because the mistake only helps us learn. But if we don't evaluate ourselves afterwards, and we don't face our mistakes, then what has been learned?
This is also why the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Good intentions are great, but they don't mean anything if you don't learn from your mistakes and evaluate how to do better in life. You can actually do great harm if you act without first understanding what it is you are doing or getting into.
Not out of fear but love of course. And the reason why we love that which we identify as bad or evil? Is because all that is bad and evil is still given to us by God. And the righteous man loves his enimes enough to deliver justice.
A pious man never needs proof to believe, but he still has to work for the blessings that he recieves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Joe Green let me put it this way, anyone who says they have all the answers and claims to be the only hope for America, is probably a con artist.
Because the truth is, running a country is hard, no one has all of the answers, we need ideas to compete so the truly strong ones can win.
And anyone who tries to stand in the way of that process, is probably a big ol coward and cry baby who wants to pretend everything they say is right.
Grow up, no one is right that often, especially about leading a country.
If it where that easy, that any one person, or idea has all the answers, then a 10 year old could do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The end is near ...Your astronomical conceit
Of bulk and power is anserine.
Your ignorance so thick,
You did not know your own arithmetic.
We flung the graphs about your flying feet;
We measured your diameter —
Merely a line
Of zeros prefaced by an integer.
Before we came
You had no name.
You did not know direction or your pace;
We taught you all you ever knew
Of motion, time and space.
We healed you of your vertigo
And put you in our kindergarten show,
Perambulated you through prisms, drew
Your mileage through the Milky Way,
Lassoed your comets when they ran astray,
Yoked Leo, Taurus, and your team of Bears
To pull our kiddy cars of inverse squares.
'Boast not about your harmony,
Your perfect curves, your rings
Of pure and endless light — 'Twas we
Who pinned upon your seraphim their wings,
And when your brassy heavens rang
With joy that morning while the planets sang
Their choruses of archangelic lore,
'Twas we who ordered the notes upon their score
Out of our winds and strings.
Yes! all your shapely forms
Are ours — parabolas of silver light,
Those blueprints of your spiral stairs
From nadir depth to zenith height,
Coronas, rainbows after storms,
Auroras on your eastern tapestries
And constellations over western seas....
Just part of "the truant" by ej Pratt.
Tell whoever you "spoke" with I'll be waiting. And I know their secret. 😘
https://canpoetry.library.utoronto.ca/pratt/poem3.htm
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kathleenchilds2837 I know you don't have anything valid to say because all you did was come in here and say "DARPA".
Yes and? What about it?
I've read the actual pier review studies that suggest a lab leak was possible.
And I admit, it definitely is a possibility.
But the cats out of the bag so to speak. We have to deal with the aftermath of that first, because people are getting sick and dying.
I'm not going to allow myself to be distracted by stuff that is yet to be proven while that is occurring.
And, furthermore, Fauci is an internationally accredited Dr. Of course he'd donate money to an international test facility.
That's like saying firemen create fire by donating money to gas grill companies in hopes they make a safer product.
What the facility did from there, and the Drs in question in it's creation, are a whole different story. Not to mention the Dr who is seen as responsible for introducing these protein spikes happens to be Russian. All Fauci did is donate money, probably at the recommendation of whatever administration was running at the time.
This could have far reaching complications that involve any world government.
Not to mention this all gets more complicated once you consider Trump did things like instruct Fauci during the early stages of the pandemic, delay our response, and tried to gut the CDC before it came to us shores. And he's now trying to invest in a Chinese company that is under investigation.
The bill gates foundation is suspect in all of this, as are Tesla and Bezos who all made billions off of the virus.
There are to many people with to many motivations for an event like this to definitively point blame at anyone yet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shaun5328 1. You defended trump by saying he didn't do anything wrong to win his election just because they could not pin him specifically with charges.
2. blm was made to look bad by anarchist extremists, and alt right goons who wanted to take advantage of the chaos. We know the names of the boogaloo bois, and proud boys who escalated events in Portland and Minnesota.
3. No, put together a timeline, stop trying to play this what came first the chicken or the egg game with me when we know what dates actions where taking place.
4. Ukraine has been seeking NATO membership ever since 2014 when we supported them then under Bush Jr.
5. There you go, you have a superficial standard for success.
6. America has the KKK and neo Nazis supporting Trump and Russia currently along with alt right extremists. That is one branch of volunteers, and it has 10-20 percent reported Nazi involvement. And yes, I do see a problem with that, which is why I stated very clearly that their government needs to eradicate Nazi membership and involvement in their military. Any percentage of Nazis in your army is too many. Stop using emotionally driven talking points.
7. It appears I'm just talking to a indipendant sellout who pretends to distrust the government, and pretends to be paranoid against a new world order, but then once another country starts invading others under a dictators rule, starts acting like it's justified, because they just don't trust anything except numbers. 🙄 Do you know what centrist sway is?
8. You've been ignoring over half the points I make, and continue to post over them acting like you're opinions are facts. I'm beginning to think you just don't have a good grasp of history or logic.
9. Because you don't seem to understand why I'd think that. I've ran into some neutral contenders that just don't want US involvement. And I agree with that. But you, you unironically support their invasion. You're a charlatan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shaun5328 🤣🤣🤣🤣 the definitive cause of that fire has never been proven.
The lead experts attribute it to a spark or cigarette ash, because journalists and scientists know how to use logic, and apply aspects like Occam's razor. Something I mentioned earlier that I'm willing to bet you still don't understand.
Occam's razor states, that the best answer often has the fewest assumptions given the evidence. That doesn't mean it can't be wrong still, it just means it's the most logical conclusion given the evidence.
That's the difference between French media, and America's media.
The French wait until the facts are in before pointing blame.
American media jumps to conclusions and scapegoats.
In France Notre Dame burning was quickly reported as an accident as soon as evidence pointed that direction.
In America, they assume negative intent, then even after finding inconclusive, or 0 evidence supporting that intent, they begin to speculate and hypothesize to try and pretend they where right all along!
America reports news to try and save face, then throws it's own citizens under the bus.
The French report facts, and try there best to not let personal opinions influence there journalism.
So, why don't you tell me again how riots don't work?
Tell me you've never studied history without telling me you've never studied history?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's the cycle of life. Except seen through a different scope. The life of a society is marked by adversity and revolution. Adversity at it's foundation, and a revolution at it's end to create adversity.
Meaning, it ultimately depends on how bright and honest your leaders happen to be during the time of a revolution.
At the end of a civilization cycle, it's usually kicked off with severe distrust between social, political, and economic standings, which, needs to be disassembled so they can continue to keep going, or else it risks cannibalizing itself (economically speaking) to the point all land and wealth (not money, wealth, what you own that can be inherited) are owned by a subclass of rulers and everything else is more or less just rented at their mercy.
Of course, society has never fully engulfed itself like that, and it's in large part to, the revolution.
Pray you have bright leadership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harvestsmiles4915 special rights, no.
But I'm also understanding of the difference between a riot and an inserection.
The difference is the intention and outcome if the supposed "rioters" got their way.
Riots are 60-90 days in jail. Instigating a riot is not much more.
But trying to revoke an election result before any legal proceedings can take place, that is not the same intentions as being upset at police brutality no matter how different or extreme.
Just in principal alone, ones righteous indignation over their community is not the same as throwing a fit because the election didn't go your way.
And, when the Democrats said the election was rigged, they let the process take place, they didn't try to interfere or take back the results. They brought their concerns to court and allowed the proper dileberation to take place, and dispite the evidence they brought forward, they couldn't fina anything to keep the charges.
This time around, they aren't letting the investigation team do their job, they are trying to stand in the way of any and every court ruling that doesn't sit in their favor, and even went as far to try and sue Nevada, even after a recount showed nothing would have changed the outcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@boblewis7145 in Utah the only people who cast dead votes where for Republicans.
Oklahoma isn't the problem. The problem is that Republican states that expanded their voting rights are few and far between, a majority of them, still have passed laws further restricting rights.
No one brought up Oklahoma, you did, almost as a way of saying, "not all republican states".
Yes, there are exceptions to the general rule, because that's what makes it a general rule.
It would be impressive if other states learned from Oklahoma's, and other states examples, but they aren't now are they?
Sounds like, Oklahomans have a reason to hold other Republican states accountable for making them look bad, dispite their efforts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fake Theory you don't really care about people being called names.
You say you do because it feels like taking the high road after being called out for calling people you never met hateful.
As for dehumanizing fellow Americans, people have done far worse to one another over far less. You don't care so much about that as you care the people being poked fun at happen to align with your ideologies.
But, if I may, let's say you are right and people are purposefully misleading one another.
Wouldn't the responsible thing to do, if you had the correct information, to share that information? How selfish do you have to be to have all of the answers, then sit back and smirk saying "told ya so."
Like, if you understand what is proper to do, why sit on your hands and turn up the beast pretending doing nothing in the face of misinformation is the right answer?
Because, again, using Occam's razor, our best answers seem to be leaning towards effort, not stagnation. So if what is considered to be the best course of action (which is appropriately fitting masks, vaccines, and social distancing.) Is being denied as helpful, then surely you have a better and safer alternative?
Come on now, don't tell me you have all the answers and have been holding out on the world this whole time?
Let me guess, because ideas have people, people don't have ideas? Does that mean you're ideas are not your own and you are incapable of coming up with a unique thought too?
I play dumb, but I understand what it means, it means someone of importance and persuasion gives an idea force. But I digress, what is your alternative solution and what is its documented effectiveness?
Is it to do nothing and let herd immunity take over? Because we've seen the results of that in other nations.
So, please, if you are so informed, and have the best answer for us, can you start a movement and become a leader for the people? Or are you waiting for someone with more charisma than yourself to Cary that torch of insight?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's the cycle of life. Except seen through a different scope. The life of a society is marked by adversity and revolution. Adversity at it's foundation, and a revolution at it's end to create adversity.
Meaning, it ultimately depends on how bright and honest your leaders happen to be during the time of a revolution.
At the end of a civilization cycle, it's usually kicked off with severe distrust between social, political, and economic standings, which, needs to be disassembled so they can continue to keep going, or else it risks cannibalizing itself (economically speaking) to the point all land and wealth (not money, wealth, what you own that can be inherited) are owned by a subclass of rulers and everything else is more or less just rented at their mercy.
Of course, society has never fully engulfed itself like that, and it's in large part to, the revolution.
Pray you have bright leadership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
She didn't destroy the "me too" movement.
She just challenges the belief that we should believe all women and set a standard for what we should be looking for in these cases.
Like Jonny Depp's attorney said "this is me too, without the 'me too'"
After this case, we can validate, or invalidate a woman's claim, if she doesn't have any real evidence, by showing if there was a pattern of abuse that took place prior.
Like, am I the only one here noticing the difference between this case and Kavenaugh?
Amber heard came forward with no credible evidence, a shakey story, and no one came forward saying "I too was abused by Jonny Depp."
Get real dude. This one case is, what we call in statistics, an isolated incident that helps us understand the rules.
Believe all victims, but don't be afraid to question the evidence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@klugermann5806 But ultimately I have a theory.
One as to why so many conspiracies have started to flood ever since Trump.
It's a confusion and misinformation technique.
You see, by spreading so many lies and confounding the average citizen with so much contradictory information, that it's sort of taken on an ancient aliens type feel.
In that, these theories, are almost impossible to disprove, and even if you took the time to disprove them, not only has it already become a part of how people identify themselves, but there will come 2 others to take it's place.
Essentially, it's like an information Hydra. Each time a conspiracy gets put down, it seems two others just re-emerge in it's place, until it gets to the point you can't tell which head it is that was the issue to begin with.
They need people to believe a mariad from conspiracies ranging from false flags, to antifa, to democratic witch hunt, to you name it. None can be proved, all of them conflict with one another, so it creates confusion.
And in that confusion, anyone can say anything about it, and it can be seen as truth, just so long as there is a sliver of evidence for it.
We are experiencing, an information Hydra in America right now. Whose gonna coterize the severed heads?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It pains me to inform you that slander and libel are not free speech and are not protected.
If what you say can be shown to be slander, or libal, it's explicitly not protected as free speech.
People also like to compare this to comedians like Cleese, Chappelle, and Bill Burr.
To which I refer to the tolerance paradox. "The only thing a free society should not tolerate, is intolerance itself."
Meaning, that free speech, protects, and should protect, everything, except for what can be considered libel, slander, or defamation in other forms.
I think Americans on both sides of this argument, seem to not understand the difference between generalizations, facts, and realistic expectations for the media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Tick421 anything that's truth, has proof, that's not me just saying it, it's just the way it is.
I can give you dozens of examples of her directly responding to questions.
If you can't even bring one example up, why should anyone listen to your opinion?
Sure, you are entitled to your opinion, but I don't have to politely agree to disagree, if you can't even take the first step in defending it.
You don't automatically start with that level of respect, you haven't earned it.
If you want me or anyone else to take your "opinion" earnestly, you need to be able to back it up. Otherwise, it's just meaningless words.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1