Comments by "Krysnha Rodriguez" (@Krysnha) on "Wait! They just did WHAT with the Covid virus now? | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris" video.
-
5
-
@DieselRamcharger Mi apologies english is a second language and i express wrong, i well after seen life here and supposly the plandemic is so deadly and see many many in mi surround have it and recover in days, that was the original thing supposly the most deadly, recover in daiys and many that have the jab, getting sick, as for the plague i know the story, it was because trade, and thanks to the inquisitions there were less cats to catch the rats that bring the plague in trading ships in the fleas, many beleive it was a punish from god, kill a lot as for why it stop, many factors, first no virus or patongene is 100% deadly, many survive, many others develop inmmunity wich led to herd inmunity, also others beleive it pass the season, or the weather, europe being colder it didint favour the disease and its endurance.
Also mi apologie i didint express miself correctly original iwanted to said the opposite i personaly have very little faith in doctors and scientist
4
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Ok finish reading the thing, and well, i dont know what to think about all of these, first yes, the virus become less deadly, the original thing was 100% deadly on mice or at least in the mice they tested, and these new thing was only 80%, again what they said, second apperanlty again what they said, it was not secret they submitt the paperwork for the experiment but there was a confusion apperantly again what they said, apperantly what i understand was a problem with paperwork, what i understand, also the experiment reflect that it was not the protein spike but something else that make the virus the original one deadly.
Yet the critics come from one, the experiment being to similar to gain a function something ban in us, second that the experiment was not necesary because original thing is no longer circulating and there was no need to use it.
Whateer the case, the experiment inspite the confusion was not secret it was approve again, i am not sure because it is difficult to know who to trust.
Also in order to combat the fear mongering, think the original thing was and is acording to them the most deadliest and yet it for what i understand the numbers of deaths was inflated a lot, and these new things are even less deadly like these experiment prove so if they are tryng to do the thing more deadly they are failing wonderful.
Also it do not make the experiment less ethical, no matter what and should have not being approve
1
-
ok i scour the comments and see a couple of people that apperantly read the reserach and for what i understand is these and correct me if i am wrong, apperantly they did the virus less deadly the original thing was 100% lethal to mice and they put another protein spike from omicron, wich make it 80%, for what i understand, from the comments that supposly read the the study.
The problem is not so much if they did it or not, supposly doing these for what i read was ban by Obama, so it shouldt be done under US law, so the researches and personal should be charge, also somethign to consider.
For what i understand the original virus with for what i read is the most deadly in humans outside the fear monger was not so deadly and if you read independent media many theorise the numbers were inflated and many deaths were fake.
So there are two posibilities or A) the reasearch institute was just seen what happen but aperantly omicron make the origiina thing less lethal, or B) there is fear mongering.
But no matter the result they are doing something that was ban in US soil, but i doubt something happen to them
1